Di Rao1, Juan Xie1, Yijun Xia2, Dongsheng Cao3. 1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, 678, FuRong Road, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, China. 2. Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100000, China. 3. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, 678, FuRong Road, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, China. cds18756008507@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Seroma formation is a common complication following mastectomy. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of flap fixation techniques that omit drainage versus conventional closed drainage on seroma formation and related complications after mastectomy. METHODS: Clinical studies of flap fixation techniques versus the conventional closure technique in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary clearance were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Papers were eligible for inclusion if the outcome was described in terms of seroma formation. Studies older than 20 years, animal studies and studies involving patients undergoing direct breast reconstruction were excluded. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four cohort studies were included in our examination. Compared with the conventional drainage group, the flap fixation group had a similar incidence of seroma formation (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.30-1.93, p = 0.57). CONCLUSION: Based on current evidence, mechanical flap fixation can replace conventional drainage without increasing seroma formation after mastectomy. Further well-designed RCTs are warranted to evaluate the effects of flap fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
BACKGROUND: Seroma formation is a common complication following mastectomy. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of flap fixation techniques that omit drainage versus conventional closed drainage on seroma formation and related complications after mastectomy. METHODS: Clinical studies of flap fixation techniques versus the conventional closure technique in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary clearance were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Papers were eligible for inclusion if the outcome was described in terms of seroma formation. Studies older than 20 years, animal studies and studies involving patients undergoing direct breast reconstruction were excluded. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four cohort studies were included in our examination. Compared with the conventional drainage group, the flap fixation group had a similar incidence of seroma formation (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.30-1.93, p = 0.57). CONCLUSION: Based on current evidence, mechanical flap fixation can replace conventional drainage without increasing seroma formation after mastectomy. Further well-designed RCTs are warranted to evaluate the effects of flap fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Authors: Sarah Y Boostrom; Alyssa D Throckmorton; Judy C Boughey; Andrea C Holifield; Shaheen Zakaria; Tanya L Hoskin; Amy C Degnim Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2008-10-02 Impact factor: 6.113