BACKGROUND: Routine drain placement after breast cancer surgery is standard practice. Anchoring the axillary and mastectomy flaps to the underlying chest wall with sutures has been advocated as a means of avoiding drainage following breast surgery. This study compares outcomes following flap fixation or routine drain placement and uniquely considers the economic implications of each technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on seroma formation and wound infection following mastectomy and axillary clearance were recorded prospectively. Patients underwent either routine drain placement or flap anchoring using subcutaneous tacking sutures without drainage. Equipment and surgical bed costs were provided by our finance department. RESULTS: Data was available for 135 patients. 76 underwent flap anchoring without drainage and 59 had routine drainage. There was no difference in seroma rates between the two groups: 49% vs. 59% (p = 0.22). However, the length of hospital stay was reduced in the flap fixation group: 1.88 vs. 2.67 days (p < 0.0001). Per patient, flap suturing equated to an estimated financial saving of £ 240. CONCLUSIONS: Flap anchoring resulted in a significantly shorter hospital stay than routine drainage, with a comparable rate of seroma formation. This technique presents a viable alternative to drain placement and could lead to a considerable economic savings.
BACKGROUND: Routine drain placement after breast cancer surgery is standard practice. Anchoring the axillary and mastectomy flaps to the underlying chest wall with sutures has been advocated as a means of avoiding drainage following breast surgery. This study compares outcomes following flap fixation or routine drain placement and uniquely considers the economic implications of each technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on seroma formation and wound infection following mastectomy and axillary clearance were recorded prospectively. Patients underwent either routine drain placement or flap anchoring using subcutaneous tacking sutures without drainage. Equipment and surgical bed costs were provided by our finance department. RESULTS: Data was available for 135 patients. 76 underwent flap anchoring without drainage and 59 had routine drainage. There was no difference in seroma rates between the two groups: 49% vs. 59% (p = 0.22). However, the length of hospital stay was reduced in the flap fixation group: 1.88 vs. 2.67 days (p < 0.0001). Per patient, flap suturing equated to an estimated financial saving of £ 240. CONCLUSIONS: Flap anchoring resulted in a significantly shorter hospital stay than routine drainage, with a comparable rate of seroma formation. This technique presents a viable alternative to drain placement and could lead to a considerable economic savings.
Authors: Stefan Morarasu; Cillian Clancy; Nicolae Ghetu; Ana Maria Musina; Natalia Velenciuc; Stefan Iacob; Tudor Frunza; Cristian Ene Roata; Sorinel Lunca; Gabriel-Mihail Dimofte Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Lisa de Rooij; Sander M J van Kuijk; Els R M van Haaren; Alfred Janssen; Yvonne L J Vissers; Geerard L Beets; James van Bastelaar Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 4.430