Literature DB >> 30011052

Reliability of and Correlation Between Measurements of Acetabular Morphology.

Ariel D Davila-Parrilla, James Wylie, Courtney O'Donnell, Daniel A Maranho, Patrick Carry, Eduardo N Novais.   

Abstract

The authors sought to determine the intra- and interrater reliability of contemporary measures of acetabular morphology among a group of hip surgeons and to determine the correlations between measures of acetabular morphology. On 2 separate occasions, 3 hip surgeons independently performed blinded evaluations of anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of 40 patients. The lateral center-edge angle, medial center-edge angle, acetabular arc, extrusion index, acetabular index, Sharp's angle, posterior wall sign, crossover sign, femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof index, acetabular wall indexes, and delta angle were assessed. A linear mixed model was used for variance estimation, and kappa and intra-class correlation coefficients were assessed for reliability. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for all possible pairs of radiographic measures. The acetabular index had the greatest interrater agreement (0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.93), whereas the lateral center-edge angle had the higher intrarater agreement (0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98). The acetabular arc angle had the lowest interrater agreement (0.44; 95% CI, 0.29-0.57), and the Sharp's angle had the lowest intrarater agreement (0.66; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84). The posterior wall sign had an interrater agreement of 0.35 (95% CI, 0.11-0.54) and an intrarater agreement of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.49-0.86). The crossover sign had an interrater agreement of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.43-0.84) and an intrarater agreement of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.52-0.89). The acetabular index, lateral center-edge angle, and extrusion index presented with high coefficients of correlation. In addition, acetabular anteversion correlated with severity of dysplasia. Commonly used parameters such as the acetabular index, lateral center-edge angle, and extrusion index are reliable radiographic parameters to assess acetabular morphology. However, correlation between measures suggests that they may be redundant in quantifying acetabular morphology. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e629-e635.]. Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30011052     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20180711-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  1 in total

1.  Acetabular retroversion does not affect outcome in primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Christian Dippmann; Volkert Siersma; Søren Overgaard; Michael Rindom Krogsgaard
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.114

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.