Literature DB >> 35224347

Functionalized Boron Nanoparticles as Potential Promising Antimalarial Agents.

Yinghuai Zhu1, Parichat Prommana2, Narayan S Hosmane3, Paolo Coghi4, Chairat Uthaipibull2, Yingjun Zhang1.   

Abstract

Boron nanoparticles (BNPs), functionalized with hydroxyl groups, were synthesized in situ by a cascade process, followed by bromination and hydrolyzation reactions. These functionalized BNPs, (B m (OH) n ), were characterized using 1H and 11B NMR spectra, Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) methods. These nanoparticles were also evaluated in vitro for their antimalarial activity against Plasmodium falciparum (3D7 strain) with an IC50 value of 0.0021 μM and showed low toxicity to Uppsala 87 malignant glioma (U87MG) cell lines, malignant melanoma A375 cell lines, KB human oral cancer cell lines, rat cortical neuron cell lines, and rat fibroblast-like synoviocyte (FLS) cell lines.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35224347      PMCID: PMC8867546          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c05888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Malaria is one of the world’s deadliest diseases and spread through the bites of infected mosquitoes Anopheles.[1] Five species of Plasmodium parasites, P. falciparum, P. malariae, P. vivax, P. ovale, and Pheidole knowlesi, are often found to infect humans. The yearly cumulative number of cases reported globally is nearly 230 million, and the number of cumulative deaths has reached 409 000.[2] The most vulnerable group affected by malaria is children aged under 5 years; they accounted for 67% of all malaria deaths worldwide in 2019. Chloroquine (CQ, Figure ) was one of the most widely used antimalarial drugs, which has now been partially substituted by artemisinin (ART) and its synthetic derivatives.[3] Pyrimethamine (Figure ) is another recognized diaminopyrimidine-based antimalarial drug, an inhibitor of malarial dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR).[4] Although these antimalarial drugs are widely used in clinics, drug resistance is becoming a very concerning issue according to a report of the World Health Organization (WHO).[5] In such a situation, a parasite strain that may cause malarial infections can still survive and/or multiply despite an antimalarial drug being normally administrated and absorbed. To prevent the attack of drug-resistant parasites, WHO has recommended the combination of different types of antimalarial drugs; for example, combining artemisinins with one or more antimalarial drugs such as lumefantrine, amodiaquine, and piperaquine as artemisinin combination therapy (ACT).[6] Reports of decreased efficacy, reduced parasite clearance time in the case of ACT treatment, and widespread resistance by Plasmodium parasites suggest the need for a new search for novel pharmaceutical interventions for malaria.[7]
Figure 1

Structures of antimalarial drugs.

Structures of antimalarial drugs. Boron-based drugs represent a new class of molecules that have been found to exhibit attractive properties and activities against a number of protozoans causative of neglected tropical diseases and cryptosporidiosis and toxoplasmosis.[8,9] In the last few decades, numerous bioactive molecules and molecular tools containing boron atoms have been developed.[8] A few organoboron compounds were approved by the FDA for clinical treatments. For example, 5-fluorobenzoxaborole was approved in 2014 for the treatment of onychomycosis;[10] crisaborole was also approved by the FDA in 2016 for the clinical treatment of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.[11] For its molecular mechanism, a boron-containing drug generally has a hydroxyl group connecting directly to the boron center to form a borate.[8] The resulting boronate is reported to interact with a target protein through covalent bonding with nucleophilic entities (such as hydroxyl and amine groups of enzymes) to form a stable bond with the enzymes, thereby leading to their reversible inhibition. Also, it has been found that the boronic acid species may react with peptides to form the corresponding peptidyl boronates/boronic acids, which have various biological activities.[12,13] On the other hand, nanomaterials have been employed as drug carriers in antimalarial therapies and have shown high capacity in delivering sufficient drugs at local doses, thus avoiding drug resistance development.[14,15] Nanomaterials are applicable in varying stages of malarial parasites to enhance the drug efficacy in both human and mosquito hosts.[14,15] In this study, we combined the inherent advantages of both boric acid-based drug and nanomaterial and synthesized hydroxyl group-functionalized boron nanoparticles (B(OH)) and evaluated its cytotoxicity and antimalarial activity.

Results and Discussion

Compounds

While hydroxyl-functionalized boron nanoparticles (B(OH)) were synthesized by a straightforward route, the precursor, boron nanoparticles (BNPs), was prepared according to a literature method.[16] In brief, the BNPs were prepared by the reduction reaction of B(NCO)3 in solution by pure hydrogen gas. Boron nanoparticles reacting with bromine in carbon disulfide (CS2) afforded bromine-functionalized boron nanoparticles. The resulting nanoparticles underwent a hydrolysis reaction in a basic aqueous solution and produced hydroxyl-functionalized boron nanoparticles, B(OH). Compound B(OH) was characterized using ICP-OES, NMR spectra, and FT-IR spectra. No resonances of organic functional groups were observed in the 1H NMR spectra of B(OH) as shown in Figure b. The results were consistent with its molecular structure. In the 11B NMR (1H-coupled) spectra of B(OH) (Figure c), a very broad peak at a chemical shift (δ) of 30.15 ppm was observed for the 11B resonances of the B(OH) moiety. The results are consistent with the chemical shift of 11B atom in the molecule of diboronic acid, B2(OH)4.[17] In the FT-IR spectra (Figure d), B(OH) showed main peaks at 3447, 1409, and 1080 cm–1, which could be attributed to the stretching absorptions of the O–H and B–O bonds. Boron analysis was carried out using ICP-OES to further characterize the new product, and the results showed that the boron concentration was 98.77%, the ratio of m/n was 126.32, and the average molecular weight was 1.126 × 107 (g/mol). B(OH) was also analyzed using TEM (Figure a). The TEM image showed that the nanoparticles have a relatively narrow range of around 14–36 nm in particle size distribution with an average diameter of ∼21 nm (Figure b). The particle size was further analyzed by the dynamic light scattering (DLS) method in aqueous solution as shown in Figure c. The average DLS size of the particles was about 21 nm. The results are consistent with those of the TEM analysis. XPS analysis was conducted for B(OH) to prove the presence of elements and the chemical environment at the particle surface. High-resolution B 1s XPS spectra are presented in Figure d. Boron was observed in two oxidation states, where the peak at 187.1 eV corresponds to the elemental boron (B0) and the peak at 193.2 eV is due to oxidation of boron (B3+). These results are consistent with the literature report.[18] The survey scans confirm the presence of boron and oxygen (Figure S1). B(OH) is a deep dark-brown powder and homogeneously suspensive in deionized water and remains intact for more than 2 weeks. The unique characteristics could benefit its pharmaceutical application. The aqueous solution of B(OH) is much more stable than the solutions in diethyl ether and ethyl acetate, since precipitation occurs quickly after a few hours in the latter solutions. The real mechanism of the formation of B(OH) remains unclear at the current stage. Nevertheless, it is recognized that the nanoparticles demonstrate intensified behavior and properties of their bulky forms due to a significant increase in the surface area. This phenomenon has also been observed for boron nanoparticles. It has been proven that the reactivity of inorganic nanoparticles increases as the particle size falls to the nanoscale.[19] Therefore, it is reasonably expected that the boron nanoparticles are more reactive than bulky boron to produce B(OH).
Figure 2

Synthetic route (a), 1H NMR spectra (b), 11B NMR spectra (c), and FT-IR spectra (d) of hydroxyl-functionalized boron nanoparticles (B(OH)).

Figure 3

TEM image (a), particle size distribution histograms (b), DLS-based particle size distribution (c), and high-resolution XPS spectra of B 1s (d) of hydroxyl boron nanoparticles (B(OH)).

Synthetic route (a), 1H NMR spectra (b), 11B NMR spectra (c), and FT-IR spectra (d) of hydroxyl-functionalized boron nanoparticles (B(OH)). TEM image (a), particle size distribution histograms (b), DLS-based particle size distribution (c), and high-resolution XPS spectra of B 1s (d) of hydroxyl boron nanoparticles (B(OH)).

Cytotoxicity and Boron Uptake Assay

The in vitro cytotoxicity of the hydroxyl-functionalized boron nanoparticles B(OH) for the Uppsala 87 malignant glioma (U87MG) cell lines, malignant melanoma A375 cell lines, KB human oral cancer cell lines, rat cortical neuron cell lines, and rat fibroblast-like synoviocyte (FLS) cell lines was determined. As shown in Figure , the IC50 values of B(OH) were greater than 1000 μM for all of the examined cell lines. The FLS and U87MG cells were used to examine the boron uptake of B(OH). The boron concentration was determined using ICP-OES. The analytical results showed that boron uptakes for the nanoparticles of B(OH) in U87MG and FLS cell lines were 201.53 and 147.64 μg boron/107 cells, respectively. The results strongly suggest that the nanoparticles possess low cytotoxicity for these cell lines. The results also suggest that the functionalized nanoparticles possess membrane-permeable potential by an endocytic pathway.
Figure 4

IC50 values of hydroxyl boron nanoparticles (B(OH)) for the Uppsala 87 malignant glioma (U87MG) cell lines, malignant melanoma A375 cell lines (A375), KB human oral cancer cell lines (KB), rat fibroblast-like synoviocyte (RAT-FLS) cell lines, and rat cortical neuron (RAT-CN) cell lines.

IC50 values of hydroxyl boron nanoparticles (B(OH)) for the Uppsala 87 malignant glioma (U87MG) cell lines, malignant melanoma A375 cell lines (A375), KB human oral cancer cell lines (KB), rat fibroblast-like synoviocyte (RAT-FLS) cell lines, and rat cortical neuron (RAT-CN) cell lines.

In VitroP. falciparum Growth Inhibition Assay

The asexual 3D7 strain of P. falciparum parasites was used to evaluate the antimalarial capacity of the hydroxyl-functionalized boron nanoparticles (B(OH)). As shown in Figure , the IC50 antimalarial activity of (B(OH)) (BN1) was 2.11 ± 0.34 nM, while standard antimalarial drugs used as positive antimalarial controls, pyrimethamine (PYR) and chloroquine (CQ), showed IC50 values of 0.09 ± 0.004 μM and 14.66 ± 0.22 nM, respectively. Although the real mechanism of B(OH) inhibiting P. falciparumin vitro is unknown at the current stage, the following possibilities might inhibit the growth of the intracellular malaria parasite, and they cannot be excluded. (1) B(OH) targets the merozoites during the period of their release from one cell and invasion of another, (2) B(OH) inhibits parasite invasion, and (3) B(OH) enters the parasitophorous vacuole during the endocytosis invasion process and, subsequently, inhibits the growth of the parasite.[20] However, it has been reported that there are many alterations for the malarial parasite-invaded red blood cells, such as modification in the membrane cytoskeleton, deformability, and changes in the permeability.[20,21] Accordingly, it is reasonable to propose that nanoparticles B(OH) would be able to penetrate the leaky membrane of the host red blood cells and, therefore, demonstrate their enhanced antimalarial efficacy as shown in our study. The interaction mechanism between B(OH) and the receptor proteins is not yet known at the current stage of investigation. Nevertheless, it has been well recognized that boron-containing drugs generally have an electrophilic center of boron due to the empty p orbital in the boron element.[8] These drugs always appear as strong Lewis acids and tend to accept lone-pair electrons from a nucleophile such as enzyme proteins. After accepting a lone pair of electrons, the boron atom hybrid changes from an sp2 hybrid with trigonal conformation to an sp3 hybrid that has tetrahedral conformation. Therefore, it is reasonable to adopt the above-known mechanism of borate drugs for the compound in the current study, B(OH). In addition, there are conflicting results being reported regarding the specific uptake of macromolecules by the malaria-infected erythrocyte, evidenced by both the fluorescence and electron micrographs.[21] Therefore, more bioassessments, such as in vivo examination, are necessary for compound B(OH) to further confirm its antimalarial efficacy and also understand the interaction mechanism. Due to their unique electronic and structural properties, boron compounds are expected to lead the new generation of antibiotic drugs and overcome the growing problems of bacterial drug resistance.[8,22,23] Therefore, it is expected that compound B(OH) may reasonably alleviate the drug resistance issue in malarial treatment if it could be used in clinical trials.
Figure 5

Antimalarial activities of chloroquine (a), pyrimethamine (b), and hydroxyl-functionalized boron nanoparticles (B(OH)) (c).

Antimalarial activities of chloroquine (a), pyrimethamine (b), and hydroxyl-functionalized boron nanoparticles (B(OH)) (c).

Conclusions

In conclusion, the newly synthesized and fully characterized hydroxyl-functionalized boron nanoparticles, B(OH), possess low cytotoxicity and cell membrane permeability. They also demonstrate in vitro high antimalarial efficacy in comparison with current clinical antimalarial drugs, such as pyrimethamine and chloroquine. Thus, boron nanoparticles appear to have a high potential for the development of next-generation antimalarial drugs and the development of nanotechnology-based medicines against malaria. The compound, prepared in this study, warrants further investigations, including in vivo bioassessments, which are currently ongoing in our laboratories.

Materials and Methods

Materials

All reactions were carried out under an argon atmosphere using standard Schlenk-line techniques or in a glovebox. Solvents were dried according to the established methods and freshly distilled before use.[24] Bromine, deuterated solvents, and other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Pte. Ltd. Boron nanoparticles were prepared according to the procedure reported in the literature.[16] The 1H- and 11B NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Fourier-Transform multinuclear NMR spectrometer at 200, 64.2, and 50.3 MHz relative to external Me4Si (TMS) and BF3·OEt2 standards, respectively. All NMR spectra were recorded at ambient temperature. The FT-IR spectra were measured using an IRTracer-100 Shimadzu spectrophotometer with KBr pellets. The FT-IR multiplicities are reported as (peak shape, strength) s = singlet, vs = very strong, m = medium, and w = weak. Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) analysis was performed using a VISTA-MPX, CCD Simultaneous ICP-OES analyzer. Elemental analyses were measured using EURO EA equipment. Particle size analysis of colloidal samples (concentration 1 wt %) was performed by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements were carried out on a JEOL Tecnai-G2, FEI, analyzer at 200 kV. The TEM sample was prepared using carbon-coated copper grids (300 mesh) and by drying a small droplet of the aqueous particle dispersion overnight in deionized and oxygen-free water (∼5 μL) on it in an argon atmosphere. The oxidation states of metals were determined using an ESCALAB 250.

Synthesis of Hydroxyl Group-Functionalized Boron Nanoparticles (B(OH))

Boron nanoparticles were prepared according to the procedure reported in the literature.[16] Thus, a 5.0 mL toluene solution of B(NCO)3 in a 100 mL high-vacuum flask equipped with a stirring bar was degassed three times and subsequently charged with highly pure hydrogen gas to reach its pressure of 1 atm. The reaction mixture was heated to 50 °C in the dark for 30 min. After cooling to room temperature, the flask was transferred to a glovebox, and the gases present in the flask were released carefully. The resulting dark-brown solid was precipitated and collected by centrifugation, followed by washing with anhydrous toluene (2 × 5.0 mL) before being collected and dried inside the glovebox. Functionalized boron nanoparticles (B(OH)) were prepared by a hydrolysis reaction with in situ generated brominated boron nanoparticles as shown in Figure a. A suspension solution with ∼3.0 mg of freshly synthesized boron nanoparticles in 5.0 mL of anhydrous carbon disulfide was treated with 55.0 μL of bromine and stirred continuously for 10 h at room temperature. The resulting deep dark-brown solid was precipitated and washed with anhydrous toluene (2 × 5.0 mL). The resulting solid residue was suspended in 5.0 mL of distilled water and treated with 2.0 mL of 1.0 N sodium hydroxide solution and two drops of hydrogen peroxide solution (3% w/w) for 2 days. The reaction mixture was then neutralized with a 1.0 N hydrogen chloride aqueous solution to produce a dark-brown solid as a precipitate. The solid was collected by centrifugation, followed by washing with distilled water (2 × 5.0 mL) and acetone (2 × 3.0 mL) before being dried in the glovebox. The boron nanoparticles were analyzed using 1H and 11B NMR spectra, FT-IR spectra, ICP-OES, and TEM. The boron concentration was 98.77% (w/w) determined by ICP-MS measurement (m/n = 126.32). 1H and 13C NMR (CDCl3, relative to SiMe4; ppm): no absorptions of functional groups except deuterated solvents peaks. 11B NMR (DMSO-d6, relative to BF3·OEt2; ppm): δ 30.15 (single, broad). FT-IR (film on KBr, cm–1) 3447 (vs, br), 1637 (m, s), 1409 (s, s), 1195 (s, s), 1080 (s, br), 802 (s, br), 647 (s, s), 548 (s, s). The TEM, DLS, and XPS images of the product are shown in Figure .

Cytotoxicity Analysis

The Uppsala 87 malignant glioma (U87MG) cell lines, malignant melanoma A375 cell lines, KB human oral cancer cell lines, rat cortical neuron cell lines, and rat fibroblast-like synoviocyte (FLS) cell lines were used to test the cytotoxicity of the functionalized boron nanoparticles using the standard MTT method. The cells were treated with serial dilutions of the inhibitor (1000–3.906 μM, 1% DMSO, final) in complete reaction buffer and incubated for 96 h. The IC50 values of the functionalized boron nanoparticles (B(OH)) are greater than 1000 μM for all of the examined cell lines as shown in Figure .

Boron Uptake Assay

Briefly, 5.0 × 108 rat FLS cells or 3.5 × 107 U87MG cells were seeded and cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 24 h before the culture medium was removed by suction. The culture medium containing 0.01 mM functionalized boron nanoparticles (B(OH)) was then added, and the cells were cultured for another 24 h under the same conditions. The culture medium was removed by suction, and the cells were washed three times with PBS and treated with trypsin to recover the cells. The number of cells recovered was counted, HNO3 (2 N, 1.5 mL) was added, and the resulting mixture was heated at 80 °C for 12 h. After filtering with a membrane filter, the boron concentration was determined using ICP-OES. The results are as follows: hydroxyl boron nanoparticles (B(OH)), 201.53 (U87MG) and 147.64 (FLS) μg boron/107 cells. The asexual 3D7 strain of P. falciparum parasites was maintained in vitro in human O+ erythrocytes at 4% hematocrit in RPMI-1640 medium (Invitrogen, U.K.) supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine, 25 mM HEPES, 2 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 5 g/L AlbuMAX I (Life Technologies), 0.37 mM hypoxanthine, and 40 mg/L gentamicin under a gas mixture of 5% O2, 5% CO2, and 90% N2, at 37 °C. The parasite culture was synchronized every 3–4 days with 5% sorbitol and transferred into a fresh complete medium with uninfected erythrocytes. The growth inhibition assay was conducted according to the literature with slight modifications.[25] In brief, synchronized ring-stage parasites at 1% parasitemia and 2% hematocrit were added to individual wells of a 96-well black plate, while nonparasitized erythrocytes at 2% hematocrit served as reference controls. The test compounds were prepared at a stock concentration of 1 M in DMSO, serially diluted in complete medium, and dispensed into duplicate test wells to yield final concentrations ranging from 0 to 1000 μM. The plates were incubated at 37 °C with a gassed environment of 5% O2, 5% CO2, and 90% N2. Forty-eight hours later, SYBR Green I solution (0.2 μL of SYBR Green I/mL buffer solution consisting of 20 mM Tris 20, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 0.008% w/v saponin, and 0.08% v/v Triton X-100) was added to each well and mixed at 1000 rpm for 30 s using a microplate mixer. After 1 h of incubation in the dark at room temperature, the fluorescence signal was measured with a Spectramax M5 multimode microplate reader (Molecular Devices) with excitation and emission wavelength bands centered at 485 and 535 nm, respectively. The background reading from the wells of nonparasitized erythrocytes was subtracted to yield fluorescence counts for analysis. The SYBR Green I signals in drug-treated samples were normalized to the untreated control parasite samples in the same experiment, which were taken as 100%. Fifty percent inhibitory concentrations (IC50 values) with standard deviation (SD) were calculated from at least three experiments. Standard antimalarial drugs, pyrimethamine and chloroquine, were used as the positive antimalarial control. The results are shown in Figure .

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis and drawing graphs were carried out using Prism 9 for macOS version 9.02, GraphPad Software, LLC. The in vitro BNCT was carried out in triplicate. The values are the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. The significance of the differences in survival rates was assessed by Student’s t test.
  15 in total

Review 1.  Antimalarial drug resistance: linking Plasmodium falciparum parasite biology to the clinic.

Authors:  Benjamin Blasco; Didier Leroy; David A Fidock
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Membrane transport in the malaria-infected erythrocyte.

Authors:  K Kirk
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.

Authors:  Yongqiang Zhu; Gang Wu; Xinrong Zhu; Yuheng Ma; Xin Zhao; Yuejie Li; Yunxia Yuan; Jie Yang; Sen Yu; Feng Shao; Meng Lei
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  Boron-based drugs as antiprotozoals.

Authors:  Robert T Jacobs; Jacob J Plattner; Martine Keenan
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.915

5.  Synthesis and biological activity of peptide proline-boronic acids as proteasome inhibitors.

Authors:  Liqiang Han; Yanzhao Wen; Ridong Li; Bo Xu; Zemei Ge; Xin Wang; Tieming Cheng; Jingrong Cui; Runtao Li
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Liquid-Phase Synthesis of Boron Isocyanates: Precursors to Boron Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yinghuai Zhu; Narayan S Hosmane
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Development of 2,4-diaminopyrimidines as antimalarials based on inhibition of the S108N and C59R+S108N mutants of dihydrofolate reductase from pyrimethamine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Bongkoch Tarnchompoo; Chawanee Sirichaiwat; Worrapong Phupong; Chakapong Intaraudom; Worachart Sirawaraporn; Sumalee Kamchonwongpaisan; Jarunee Vanichtanankul; Yodhathai Thebtaranonth; Yongyuth Yuthavong
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-03-14       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 8.  Promising nanomaterials in the fight against malaria.

Authors:  Livia Neves Borgheti-Cardoso; María San Anselmo; Elena Lantero; Alexandre Lancelot; José Luis Serrano; Silvia Hernández-Ainsa; Xavier Fernàndez-Busquets; Teresa Sierra
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 9.  Nanomedicine against malaria.

Authors:  Patricia Urbán; Xavier Fernàndez-Busquets
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Organoboron Compounds: Effective Antibacterial and Antiparasitic Agents.

Authors:  Paolo Saul Coghi; Yinghuai Zhu; Hongming Xie; Narayan S Hosmane; Yingjun Zhang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Nanoenergetic Materials: Enhanced Energy Release from Boron by Aluminum Nanoparticle Addition.

Authors:  Prawal P K Agarwal; Themis Matsoukas
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-07-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.