| Literature DB >> 35223931 |
Boqiang Shen1, Juan Hao1, Yanying Lin2, Xingchen Li1, Xiao Yang1, Ting Huang1, Jiaqi Wang1, Yuanyuan Jia1, Jingyi Zhou1, Jianliu Wang1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Calcium is present in serum mainly in filterable and bound forms, and Ca2+ is a major key to modulate signaling pathways that control oncogenesis and oncochannels associated with several types of cancer. However, the biological significance of serum calcium and its related mechanism with estrogen in endometrial cancer (EC) still remains elusive. This study aims to ascertain the relationship between serum calcium and clinicopathology in EC.Entities:
Keywords: calcium homeostasis; endometrial cancer (EC); estrogen; prognosis (carcinoma); serum calcium
Year: 2022 PMID: 35223931 PMCID: PMC8866192 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.835700
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1Patient selection for EC patients.
Demographic characteristics for EC patients according to quartiles of serum calcium and corrected serum calcium.
|
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Age (yr) | 55.84 ± 9.57 | 55.09 ± 9.43 | 55.27 ± 10.02 | 57.07 ± 9.45 | 55.98 ± 9.34 | 0.241 | 55.09 ± 9.43 | 55.5 ± 9.25 | 56.43 ± 10.11 | 57.37 ± 9.59 | 0.004 |
| <40 | 26 (5.18) | 7 (5.38) | 8 (6.25) | 5 (4.1) | 6 (4.92) | 9 (7.14) | 6 (4.8) | 7 (5.51) | 4 (3.23) | ||
| 40-50 | 114 (22.71) | 38 (29.23) | 32 (25) | 21 (17.21) | 23 (18.85) | 34 (26.98) | 31 (24.8) | 26 (20.47) | 23 (18.55) | ||
| 50-60 | 208 (41.43) | 46 (35.38) | 53 (41.41) | 53 (43.44) | 56 (45.9) | 55 (43.65) | 55 (44) | 55 (43.31) | 43 (34.68) | ||
| 60-70 | 125 (24.9) | 33 (25.38) | 27 (21.09) | 34 (27.87) | 31 (25.41) | 24 (19.05) | 27 (21.6) | 27 (21.26) | 47 (37.9) | ||
| >70 | 29 (5.78) | 6 (4.62) | 8 (6.25) | 9 (7.38) | 6 (4.92) | 4 (3.17) | 6 (4.8) | 12 (9.45) | 7 (5.65) | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.3 ± 4.61 | 26.1 ± 4.96 | 26.22 ± 4.08 | 26.88 ± 5.24 | 26.01 ± 4.06 | 0.830 | 25.9 ± 4.51 | 26.22 ± 4.08 | 26.88 ± 5.24 | 26.41 ± 4.78 | 0.410 |
| <24 | 152 (30.28) | 41 (31.54) | 33 (25.78) | 38 (31.15) | 40 (32.79) | 46 (36.51) | 32 (25.6) | 38 (29.92) | 36 (29.03) | ||
| 24-28 | 196 (39.04) | 53 (40.77) | 52 (40.63) | 42 (34.43) | 49 (40.16) | 48 (38.1) | 52 (41.6) | 49 (38.58) | 47 (37.9) | ||
| >28 | 154 (30.68) | 36 (27.69) | 43 (33.59) | 42 (34.43) | 33 (27.05) | 32 (25.4) | 41 (32.8) | 40 (31.5) | 41 (33.06) | ||
| Menopausal status | 0.014 | 0.236 | |||||||||
| No | 182 (36.25) | 55 (42.31) | 53 (41.41) | 37 (30.33) | 37 (30.33) | 50 (39.68) | 46 (36.8) | 46 (36.22) | 40 (32.26) | ||
| Yes | 320 (63.75) | 75 (57.69) | 75 (58.59) | 85 (69.67) | 85 (69.67) | 76 (60.32) | 79 (63.2) | 81 (63.78) | 84 (67.74) | ||
| Grade | 0.320 | 0.062 | |||||||||
| I | 165 (32.87) | 41 (31.54) | 42 (32.81) | 49 (40.16) | 33 (27.05) | 38 (30.16) | 48 (38.4) | 46 (36.22) | 33 (26.61) | ||
| II | 218 (43.43) | 58 (44.62) | 61 (47.66) | 49 (40.16) | 50 (40.98) | 65 (51.59) | 53 (42.4) | 46 (36.22) | 54 (43.55) | ||
| III | 119 (23.71) | 31 (23.85) | 25 (19.53) | 24 (19.67) | 39 (31.97) | 23 (18.25) | 24 (19.2) | 35 (27.56) | 37 (29.84) | ||
| FIGO 2009 | 0.073 | 0.012 | |||||||||
| I | 398 (79.28) | 105 (80.77) | 104 (81.25) | 100 (81.97) | 89 (72.95) | 104 (82.54) | 102 (81.6) | 106 (83.46) | 86 (69.35) | ||
| II | 25 (4.98) | 7 (5.38) | 4 (3.13) | 8 (6.56) | 6 (4.92) | 7 (5.56) | 3 (2.4) | 5 (3.94) | 10 (8.06) | ||
| III | 64 (12.75) | 17 (13.08) | 15 (11.72) | 14 (11.48) | 18 (14.75) | 14 (11.11) | 17 (13.6) | 13 (10.24) | 20 (16.13) | ||
| IV | 15 (2.99) | 1 (0.77) | 5 (3.91) | 0 (0) | 9 (7.38) | 1 (0.79) | 3 (2.4) | 3 (2.36) | 8 (6.45) | ||
| Histologic subtype | 0.296 | 0.126 | |||||||||
| EEC | 432 (86.06) | 112 (86.15) | 114 (89.06) | 106 (86.89) | 100 (81.97) | 115 (91.27) | 106 (84.8) | 106 (83.46) | 105 (84.68) | ||
| NEEC | 70 (13.94) | 18 (13.85) | 14 (10.94) | 16 (13.11) | 22 (18.03) | 11 (8.73) | 19 (15.2) | 21 (16.54) | 19 (15.32) | ||
| LNM | 0.303 | 0.001 | |||||||||
| No | 445 (88.65) | 116 (89.23) | 114 (89.06) | 113 (92.62) | 102 (83.61) | 118 (93.65) | 113 (90.4) | 115 (90.55) | 99 (79.84) | ||
| Yes | 57 (11.35) | 14 (10.77) | 14 (10.94) | 9 (7.38) | 20 (16.39) | 8 (6.35) | 12 (9.6) | 12 (9.45) | 25 (20.16) | ||
| LVSI | 0.112 | 0.011 | |||||||||
| No | 415 (82.67) | 110 (84.62) | 107 (83.59) | 106 (86.89) | 92 (75.41) | 115 (91.27) | 103 (82.4) | 102 (80.31) | 95 (76.61) | ||
| Yes | 87 (17.33) | 20 (15.38) | 21 (16.41) | 16 (13.11) | 30 (24.59) | 11 (8.73) | 22 (17.6) | 25 (19.69) | 29 (23.39) | ||
| Myometrial invasion | 0.993 | 0.002 | |||||||||
| No | 338 (67.33) | 83 (63.85) | 90 (70.87) | 83 (69.75) | 78 (63.93) | 90 (71.43) | 94 (75.2) | 86 (67.72) | 68 (54.84) | ||
| Yes | 164 (32.67) | 47 (36.15) | 37 (29.13) | 36 (30.25) | 44 (36.07) | 36 (28.57) | 31 (24.8) | 41 (32.28) | 56 (45.16) | ||
| Cervical invasion | 0.123 | 0.017 | |||||||||
| No | 401 (79.88) | 106 (81.54) | 104 (81.89) | 99 (83.19) | 89 (72.95) | 104 (82.54) | 104 (83.2) | 107 (84.25) | 86 (69.35) | ||
| Yes | 101 (20.12) | 24 (18.46) | 23 (18.11) | 20 (16.81) | 33 (27.05) | 22 (17.46) | 21 (16.8) | 20 (15.75) | 38 (30.65) | ||
| Peritoneal cytology | 0.079 | 0.064 | |||||||||
| No | 466 (92.83) | 124 (95.38) | 117 (92.13) | 111 (93.28) | 110 (90.16) | 122 (96.83) | 115 (92) | 115 (90.55) | 114 (91.94) | ||
| Yes | 36 (7.17) | 6 (4.62) | 10 (7.87) | 8 (6.72) | 12 (9.84) | 4 (3.17) | 10 (8) | 12 (9.45) | 10 (8.06) | ||
| Albumin (g/L) | 43.42 ± 4.4 | 41.05 ± 5.45 | 43.58 ± 3.62 | 44.46 ± 3.19 | 44.78 ± 3.91 | <0.0001 | 47.41 ± 1.91 | 43.58 ± 3.62 | 43.34 ± 1.68 | 37.76 ± 4.31 | <0.0001 |
| CA125 (U/ml) | 34.04 ± 48.06 | 30.36 ± 38.98 | 32.36 ± 50.68 | 33.04 ± 44.98 | 40.41 ± 56.19 | 0.163 | 26.67 ± 24.85 | 33.19 ± 41.1 | 33.9 ± 50.36 | 42.24 ± 65.46 | 0.697 |
| CA199 (U/ml) | 27.67 ± 46.40 | 26.91 ± 64.89 | 25.34 ± 38.1 | 28.32 ± 29.88 | 29.64 ± 48.77 | 0.640 | 24.29 ± 29.1 | 24.38 ± 29.76 | 27.31 ± 41.17 | 36.6 ± 77.57 | 0.102 |
| Corrected calcium (mmol/L) | 2.01 ± 0.33 | 2.02 ± 0.42 | 1.97 ± 0.29 | 1.99 ± 0.25 | 2.07 ± 0.34 | <0.0001 | – | – | – | – | |
The quantitative variables were described as number (%), mean ± standard deviation (SD), or median (interquartile range, IQR). Categorical variables were presented as proportions. BMI, body mass index; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; EEC, endometrioid endometrial carcinoma NEEC, non-endometrioid endometrial carcinoma; LNM, lymph node metastasis; LVSI, Lymph vascular space invasion. Linear trend across quartiles of serum calcium was tested by entering the median value of each quartile into the generalized linear model. Data are expressed as the mean (standard deviation) for normally distributed data, the median (interquartile range) for nonnormally distributed data, and the percentage (%) for categorical variables.
Univariate logistic regression analysis of in EC patients.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Age (y) | 1.4 (1.1,1.8) | 0.006 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.9 (0.7,1.3) | 0.705 |
| Serum calcium (mmol/L) | 2.4 (0.5,12.5) | 0.287 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 1.0 (0.9,1.0) | 0.173 |
| CA125 (U/ml) | 1.0 (1.0,1.0) | <0.001 |
| Menopause | 1.7 (1.0,2.8) | 0.038 |
| Tumor grade | 7.4 (4.5,12.2) | <0.001 |
| FIGO stage | 2.9 (2.3,3.8) | <0.001 |
| Cervical invasion | 8.0 (4.8,13.4) | <0.001 |
| Myometrial invasion | 11.4 (6.6,20.0) | <0.001 |
|
|
| |
| Q1 ( ≤ 1.81) | 1.0 | |
| Q2 (1.82-1.95) | 1.9 (0.8,4.1) | 0.123 |
| Q3 (1.96–2.12) | 2.7 (1.3,5.8) | 0.009 |
| Q4 (>2.12) | 3.3 (1.6,6.9) | 0.002 |
BMI, body mass index; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; LVSI, lymph vascular space invasion.
Figure 2The calcium homeostasis regulated by estrogen in EC cells is derived from extracellular calcium influx but not the release of the endoplasmic reticulum. (A) The effect of E2-BSA of EC cell lines on calcium influx. Depicted are representative confocal images after adding 100 nm E2-BSA on the 60s. Average fluorescence intensity of each cell in the field (F), normalized to the non-specific background fluorescence (F0) to obtain the fluorescence intensity (F/F0). (B) E2-BSA stimulation of Ishikawa cells with calcium-free buffer solution D-HANKs or calcium chelating agent EGTA to remove extracellular calcium levels. N = 50. (C) E2-BSA stimulation of Ishikawa cells with inhibitors of endoplasmic reticulum calcium release (2-APB and Dantrolene 10μm) for 30 min. (D,E) GECI probe jGcamp7f transfected Ishikawa cells with E2-BSA stimulated calcium imaging. (F) Effect of different concentrations of calcium levels on estrogen-regulated calcium influx. All data are presented as the means ± SE. n = 50 for cell numbers and n = 3 for replicated. ns, non significant; ***p < 0.001. compared with the control group.
Figure 3Proteomic combined with transcriptomic analysis of E2-BSA treated Ishikawa cell line. (A) Venn diagram and volcano chart depicting the overlap of proteomic and transcriptomic relative genes. (B) The distribution of genes up- and down-regulated in protein and transcript, respectively. (C) Results of GO and KEGG analysis of the up-regulated genes in proteomic. (D) Results of up-regulated proteomic combined with unchanged transcriptomic genes of GO and KEGG analysis.
Figure 4The influence of estrogen-regulated calcium influx in the mitochondrion of Ishikawa cell line. (A) The effect of E2-BSA induced calcium influx of mitochondrion calcium in the Ishikawa cell line. Rohd2-am (red) was used to label the calcium of mitochondrion. (B) Influence of calcium influx of mitochondrion ROS. Magnification 63 ×. Scale bar 25μm. (C,D) Confocal images and flow cytometry of the influence of calcium influx of intracellular total ROS level detected by DC-FHDA. Magnification 63 ×. Scale bar 100μm. All data are presented as the means ± SE. n = 50 for cell numbers and n = 3 for replicated.
Figure 5The influence of estrogen-regulated calcium influx in Ishikawa and Hec-1A cell line lysosome. (A) An E2-BSA significantly promoted the LAMP1 expression in Ishikawa cells with rapid effect. (B) Inhibition of extracellular calcium influx reduced lysosomal response. (C) Effect of E2-BSA on lysosomes. The lysosomes were labeled by 5 nM Lyso-Tracker Red (LTR) and examined confocal. Magnification 63 ×. Scale bar 25 or 5μm. (D) Ishikawa cells stained with 5 μg/ml acridine orange (AO) for 15 min were then treated with E2-BSA and imaged under a confocal microscope (scale bar: 25 μm). (E) E2-BSA treatment causes differential regulation in Ishikawa or HEC-1A cells. The activities of CTSB were measured by the fluorometric method using commercially available kits. All data are presented as the means ± SE. n = 3–4. (F,G) E2-BSA stimulated external calcium influx can activate the nuclear translocation of TFEB. (H) Effect of TFEB nuclear shift after E2-BSA treatment. All data are presented as the means ± SE. n = 50 for cell numbers and n = 3 for replicated. ns, non significant; **p < 0.01 compared with the control group.