Literature DB >> 35222854

Frequency and antimicrobial resistance pattern of bacterial isolates from patients with COVID-19 in two hospitals of Zanjan.

Narges Moradi1, Niloufar Kazemi1, Mehdi Ghaemi2, Bahman Mirzaei3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The outbreak of COVID-19 has been challenging the global health systems. As one of the major associated concerns, microbial co-infections and antimicrobial resistance play critical roles in the prognosis of the disease. This study aims to evaluate co-infections in COVID-19 patients regarding drug resistance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 5530 Real Time PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases, who were admitted to two major educational Hospitals in Zanjan, Iran, from February 2019 to February 2020 were included. Respiratory, blood and urine specimens were collected and cultured on selective media. Subsequently, isolates identification, disc diffusion susceptibility tests, and data analysis were carried out.
RESULTS: Bacterial and fungal co-infections were confirmed in 423 patients (8.1%). Co-infections were more prevalent among females (53.2%) than males (46.8%). Coinfected patients had a significantly higher mortality rate compared to those without co-infections (54.8% vs. 12.2%, P<0.001). Acinetobacter baumannii was the most prevalent bacteria isolated from respiratory tract (15.4%) and blood (2.1%). Escherichia coli (12.5%) was the most frequent bacteria in urine. Fungal co-infection was confirmed in 174 (3.36%) patients. Gram-negative bacteria were highly sensitive to colistin (97.85%) and widely resistant to cefixime (91.79%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (89.64%). Gram-positive bacteria were considerably sensitive to vancomycin (68%) and nitrofurantoin (66%). Tetracycline and ampicillin were the least effective antibiotics for Gram-positive bacteria with respective resistance rates of 90.91% and 83.33%.
CONCLUSION: Given the high incidence of bacterial co-infections in COVID-19 patients, it is important to develop rapid and efficient diagnostic, therapeutic and disinfection guidelines to control these infections in the hospitals.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial co-infections; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Susceptibility testing

Year:  2021        PMID: 35222854      PMCID: PMC8816689          DOI: 10.18502/ijm.v13i6.8078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Microbiol        ISSN: 2008-3289


INTRODUCTION

Pneumonia is an inflammatory condition of the lung, which is characterized by the involvement of pulmonary alveoli. Following the swelling of the air sacs, the respiratory capacity decreases. Viruses and bacteria are of great importance in causing pneumonia; however, pneumonia can be caused by fungal, parasitic, or autoimmune diseases (1). Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the most common causes of bacterial pneumonia (2). Although rare cases of pulmonary viral infections are associated with factors such as adenoviruses, metapneumoviruses, and hantaviruses, influenza A and B, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and human parainfluenza virus are the most common viral respiratory infections, and in addition to this list, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS- COV-2) has brought about several health problems to the therapeutic community (1). One of the regarding problems is the simultaneous occurrence of bacterial and fungal infections with the mentioned virus. On December 31, 2019, seven cases of acute respiratory syndrome were reported to the Municipal Health Commission of Wuhan, China. The early symptoms included fever, dry coughs, and shortness of breath, and radiological findings indicated lung involvement. The causative agent of this airborne infection, which is a beta-coronavirus with RNA and envelope, was named SARS-COV2, and the disease was named COVID-19 by the World Health Organization (WHO). Rapid person-to-person transmission of the disease occurs either directly or indirectly. In the direct way, close contact with infected individuals (at a distance of less than one meter) transmits the nasal secretions of the infected person during sneezing, coughing, and talking. However, the new coronavirus can also cause the disease indirectly through contact with infected objects (3). Following the spread of the severe viral pneumonia from China and the first cases outside China (Thailand, Japan, South Korea) on January 20, 2020, and the first European (France) report on January 24, 2020, the disease became a widespread pandemic and affected more than 135 million people worldwide by April 2021, killing almost three million patients (4). By April 2021, the total number of cases was estimated at 2.05 million. Disease-related deaths in Iran were estimated at 64,000; the mortality rate in the country (about 3.1%) is significantly higher than the global average (about 2.1%) (P<0.001) (5). According to various studies, clinical information and lung tissue examinations of deceased patients are indicative of presence of respiratory bacterial infections. Incidence of secondary infections and co-infections (especially bacterial infections) are very likely in infected patients because of the weakening nature of SARS-CoV-2. The virus manifests more severely in patients with underlying diseases or immunocompromised individuals. Furthermore, the outbreak of secondary bacterial infections in Wuhan was reported to be 15% (6). According to the previous literature, 14.3% and 3.5% of patients were diagnosed with secondary bacterial infections and co-infections, respectively. Early detection of co-infections and proper prognosis are of great importance (7). Bacterial infection is defined as growth of pathogenic bacteria on the body surface or inside the body. Bacterial respiratory infections affect respiratory organs, leading to mild to severe pneumonia. S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa are the most common causes of bacterial pneumonia. Meanwhile, 15% of bacterial pneumonias are caused by less common microorganisms including Klebsiella pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia psittaci, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Coxiella burnetii, Bordetella pertussis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Moraxella catarrhalis (2). Coinfections are common among people with viral infections; they are in fact one of the major reasons behind involvement and mortality. In other words, in several cases the patients may face acute conditions or even die due to secondary bacterial infection or dealing with more than one infectious agent at a time. Infectious pneumonias have similar clinical symptoms attaching importance to identification of the causative pathogen in early stages, effective treatment, and prevention of ineffective and improper prescription of antibiotics, which contributes to antibiotic resistance. Antibiotics are compounds that can destroy some of bacteria by killing them or inhibiting the growth and multiplication of microorganisms. The novelty of this condition, obscures the precise link between bacterial infections and the novel coronavirus. This is while the medical community needs treatment guidelines as soon as possible in order to diagnose and evaluate the effect of potential antibiotics on these co-infections considering geographical diversity (7). The ever-rising spread of secondary infections can cause property damage and casualty to patients and medical staff. Nosocomial infections, which were one of the main problems medical facilities were facing before the outbreak of coronavirus, have gained more importance during the pandemic due to the dramatic increase in the vulnerable population. As a result, the incidence increases among hospitalized patients and the medical staff. Studies carried out on COVID-19 coinfections and the associated antibiotic resistance pattern in every province provide a clearer prognosis of the disease and finally, reduce antibiotic resistance and the cost of treatment, which happens to be very high. The aim of our study was to determine frequency of bacterial strainsinclinicalspecimensinCOVID-19hospitalized patients based on demographic characteristics of patients and developing an antibiotic prescribing guideline for COVID-19 patients in Zanjan province, Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

The current study is in accordance to the ethical principles and the standards for conducting medical research in Iran and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (IR.ZUMS. REC.1399.377).

Sample collection and culture.

In this cross-sectional study, a total number of 2856 respiratory tract, blood, and urine samples of clinical origin were collected from Real Time PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients hospitalized in Valie-Asr and Mousavi hospitals in Zanjan, Iran, from February 2019 to February 2020. Identification of bacterial isolates was don based on the standard biochemical and microbiological tests (8).

Identification of bacterial isolates.

Isolate identification was carried out based on Bergeys microbiology book guidelines (8). Gram staining, various media and conventional biochemical tests including oxidase, catalase, Triple Sugar Iron Agar (TSI), Sulfide Indole Motility (SIM), citrate, Methyl Red (MR)/ Voges-Proskauer (VP), urease, sensitivity to specific antibiotic disks, Mannitol Salt Agar, Dnase, etc. (Merck, Germany) were used to confirm the growth of the bacteria.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Disc diffusion susceptibility tests were carried out for positive clinical cultures according to the clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI) guidelines (Kirby–Bauer method) (9). Subsequent to dipping a sterile swab in each of the 0.5 McFarland suspensions of the isolates, inoculation was done on Muller-Hinton agar (MHA) plate surface by streaking the swab in backand-forth motion. The following disks were applied for Gram-negative bacteria within 15 min of inoculation: amikacin (AN) (30 μg), gentamicin (GM) (10 μg), imipenem (IMP) (10 μg), nitrofurantoin (FM) (300 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) (25 [1.25/23.75] μg), ciprofloxacin (CP) (5 μg), cefepime (FEP) (30 μg), ceftriaxone (CRO) (30 μg), cefixime (CFM) (5 μg), cefazolin (CZ) (10), ceftazidime (CAZ) (30 μg), meropenem (MEN) (10 μg), nalidixic acid (NA) (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), and colistin (CL) (10 μg). The following disks were applied for Gram-positive bacteria within 15 min of inoculation: amikacin (AN) (30 μg), gentamicin (GM) (10 μg), imipenem (IMP) (10 μg), nitrofurantoin (FM) (300 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) (25 [1.25/23.75] μg), ciprofloxacin (CP) (5 μg), penicillin (P) (10 μg), tetracycline (TE) (30 μg), vancomycin (V) (30 μg), cefazolin (CZ) (10), clindamycin (CC) (2 μg), meropenem (MEN) (10 μg) and ampicillin (10 μg). The MHA plates were incubated at a temperature of 37°C for 24 h (9).

Statistical analysis.

Data analysis was performed using SPSS 26 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL., USA) and P-values of less than 0.05 were defined as statistically significant. Variables in independent groups were compared using the Chi-square test.

RESULTS

From February 20, 2019 to February 20, 2020, a total number of 5530 Real Time PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases were admitted to Vali-Asr Educational Hospital and Mousavi Educational Hospital in Zajan, Iran. The admitted patients consisted of 2728 (49%) females and 2802 (51%) males with an overall mortality rate of 14.6% (n=812). Our study included COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized for one or more days. Therefore, out of 5530 admitted patients, 5166 cases (93%) were investigated for bacterial and fungal co-infections of respiratory tract, blood, and urine samples. According to the laboratory identification of isolates, bacterial and/or fungal co-infections were confirmed in 423 patients (8.1%) who consist the population of our study. Fig. 1 depicts the aforementioned information.
Fig. 1.

Co-infections and mortality rates in the admitted patients.

Co-infections and mortality rates in the admitted patients. Blood, urine, and respiratory tract cultures were respectively ordered for 472 (9.2%), 2132 (41.6%) and 242 (4.6%) patients. Patients aging from 60 to 70 years (26.2%, n=111) had the highest ratio in this study and co-infections were the least prevalent among patients younger than 10 (1.2%, n=5). Bacterial and fungal co-infections were more prevalent among females (53.2%, n=225) than males (46.8%, n=198); nevertheless, the difference was not significant (P=0.383). Co-infection in COVID-19 patients was associated with longer length of stay. The median length of stay for these patients was 11 days with an average of 13.91 days. Mortality rate was significantly higher in coinfected patients compared to non-coinfected patients (54.8% vs. 12.2%, P<0.001). ICU admission was significantly higher in patients diagnosed with bacterial and fungal co-infections compared non-coinfected COVID-19 patients (55.8% vs. 16%, P P<0.001). The most frequent wards of hospitalization for the coinfected patients were as follows: internal (13.9%, n=59), infectious diseases (6.9%, n=29), cardiology (5.7%, n=24), surgery (5.2%, n=22), respiratory (4.7%, n=20), coronary care unit (2.8%, n=12), gynecology (2.6%, n=11), and neurosurgery (2.4%, n=10). A significant proportion of patients (70%, P<0.001) had at least one comorbidity alongside SARS-COV-2 infection, with hypertension (38.8%) and diabetes (24.3%) being the most common coexisting medical conditions followed by ischemic heart diseases (13%, n=55) and other cardiovascular dysfunctions (6.9%, n=29), hyperlipidemia (5.9%, n=25), Alzheimer’s disease and other cognitive impairments (4.7%, n=20), Cerebrovascular accident (3.8%, n=6), thyroid disorders (3.1%, n=13), cancer (3.1%, n=13), rheumatoid arthritis (2.8%, n=12), asthma (1.9%, n=8), Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1.4%, n=6), obstructive airway disease (.02%, n=1), and other previous medical history (14.7%, n=62). Respiratory (40%, n=169), urinary tract (32.6%, n=138) and blood (9.2%, n=39) infections were respectively the most prevalent co-infections confirmed in the included COVID-19 patients. Table 1 provides information on the types and frequencies of the bacteria isolated from the mentioned specimens. Escherichia coli was the main Gram-negative (12.5%, n=53) and Group D streptococci (GDS) were the main gram-positive (5.7%, n=24) pathogen isolated from the urine samples of the included patients. Yeast was isolated from the urine samples of 125 patients (29.6%). Among the Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms isolated from respiratory samples of COVID-19 hospitalized patients, Acinetobacter baumannii (15.4%, n=65) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (1.7%, n=7) had the highest prevalence rates, respectively. Fungal respiratory co-infections were reported in 46 (10.9%) patients. Bacteremia was identified in 39 patients (9.2%) with A. baumannii (2.1%, n=9) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (1.7%, n=7) being the most commonly identified Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, respectively. Yeast was not isolated from the blood samples of the patients. Stool co-infections were rare with a total rate of 0.7% (n=3) and yeast was the only organism isolated from the stool samples. Morganella morganii and Proteus mirabilis were the least frequent organisms with a 0.2% isolation rate.
Table 1.

Prevalence of clinically isolated bacteria based on the sample type in a total number of 423 coinfected cases.

Bacteria Urine samples Respiratory samples Blood samples
Gram Negative Acinetobacter baumannii 1.9% (n=8)15.4% (n=65)2.1% (n=9)
Escherichia coli 12.5% (n=53)2.1% (n=9)1.4% (n=6)
Klebsiella pneumoniae 5% (n=21)12.5% (n=54)1.4% (n=6)
Klebsiella oxytoca 0.5% (n=2)--
Citrobacter freundii -1.9% (n=8)0.2% (n=1)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3.1% (n=13)1.9% (n=8)0.2% (n=1)
Serratia marcescens 0.7% (n=3)2.1% (n=9)0.5% (n=2)
Morganella morganii 0.2% (n=1)--
Proteus mirabilis -0.2% (n=1)-
Gram Positive Staphylococcus aureus 0.2% (n=1)0.9% (n=4)0.7% (n=3)
Staphylococcus epidermidis 0.7% (n=3)0.5% (n=2)1.7% (n=7)
Staphylococcus saprophyticus 1.7% (n=7)1.7% (n=7)0.2% (n=1)
Other coagulase-negative Staphylococci0.5% (n=2)-0.2% (n=1)
Group D streptococci5.7% (n=24)0.5% (n=2)0.5% (n=2)
Prevalence of clinically isolated bacteria based on the sample type in a total number of 423 coinfected cases. The clinically isolated Gram-negative bacteria were highly sensitive to colistin with an average sensitivity rate of 97.85%, making it the drug of choice. They nevertheless, were the most resistant to cefixime (91.79%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (89.64%). The isolated Gram-positive bacteria were majorly sensitive to vancomycin and nitrofurantoin. Ciprofloxacin and tetracycline were the least effective antibiotics for Gram-positive bacteria with respective resistance rates of 90.91% and 83.33%. The results from antibacterial susceptibility tests in gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms are provided in Tables 2 and 3.
Table 2.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing results of a total number of 280 patients (N), who were coinfected with Gram-negative bacteria and the associated resistance rates.

Number of Isolates (n) A. baumannii K. pneumonia E. coli P. aeruginosa S. marcescens C. freundii K. oxytoca M. morganii P. mirabilis Total (N) Resistance Rate (%)

82 81 68 22 14 9 2 1 1 280
AmikacinSusceptible019340430006078.21
Intermediate0000100001
Resistant8262342296211219
GentamicinSusceptible28393221005779.64
Intermediate0000000000
Resistant80732919127111223
ImipenemSusceptible28392010105379.64
Intermediate0130000004
Resistant80722620148201223
NitrofurantoinSusceptible21355800201011757.14
Intermediate0020010003
Resistant6146822146201160
Trimethoprim/SulfamethoxazoleSusceptible3596300102789.64
Intermediate0020000002
Resistant79765716119201251
CiprofloxacinSusceptible29244020104283.93
Intermediate0120000003
Resistant80714218147201235
CefepimeSusceptible09180000102887.5
Intermediate0070000007
Resistant82724322149201245
CeftriaxoneSusceptible34160120102782.14
Intermediate3100000004
Resistant76575222137201230
CefiximeSusceptible01090210102391.79
Intermediate0000000000
Resistant82715922128201257
CefazolinSusceptible00680100117174.29
Intermediate0000100001
Resistant8281022129200208
CeftazidimeSusceptible014160420103785.36
Intermediate0030100004
Resistant8267492297201239
MeropenemSusceptible1620330520007671.07
Intermediate0020110105
Resistant6661332286201199
Nalidixic acidSusceptible010711030003188.93
Intermediate0000000000
Resistant82716111146211249
AmpicillinSusceptible00340000003487.86
Intermediate0000000000
Resistant82813422149211246
ColistinSusceptible827568221492112740.00
Intermediate0600000006
Resistant0000000000
Table 3.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing results of a total number of 66 patients (N), who were coinfected with Gram-positive bacteria and the associated resistance rates.

Number of Isolates (n) Group D Streptococci S. saprophyticus S. epidermidis S. aureus Coagulase-Negative Staph-ylococci Total (N) Resistance Rate (%)

28 15 12 8 3 66
AmikacinSusceptible842011569.70
Intermediate211015
Resistant181098146
GentamicinSusceptible1222522363.64
Intermediate000101
Resistant1613102142
ImipenemSusceptible1600422257.58
Intermediate420006
Resistant813124138
NitrofurantoinSusceptible18712434433.33
Intermediate000000
Resistant10804022
Trime-thoprim/SulfamethoxazoleSusceptible712511671.21
Intermediate003003
Resistant211473247
CiprofloxacinSusceptible01021490.91
Intermediate000202
Resistant2814124260
PenicillinSusceptible380101281.82
Intermediate000000
Resistant257127354
TetracyclineSusceptible30202783.33
Intermediate202004
Resistant231588155
VancomycinSusceptible111512524530.30
Intermediate100001
Resistant16003120
CefazolinSusceptible0012431954.55
Intermediate9002011
Resistant191502036
ClindamycinSusceptible141312214233.33
Intermediate020002
Resistant14006222
MeropenemSusceptible04230974.24
Intermediate123208
Resistant27973349
AmpicillinSusceptible390802068.18
Intermediate100001
Resistant246120345
Antibiotic susceptibility testing results of a total number of 280 patients (N), who were coinfected with Gram-negative bacteria and the associated resistance rates. Antibiotic susceptibility testing results of a total number of 66 patients (N), who were coinfected with Gram-positive bacteria and the associated resistance rates.

DISCUSSION

The emergence and outbreak of SARS-COV-2 infection has been challenging the global public health systems since December 2019. As one of the major concerns associated with the novel coronavirus disease, bacterial and fungal co-infections and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) play a critical role in the prognosis of the disease. No studies have addressed bacterial and fungal co-infections and the relative antimicrobial resistance patterns in COVID-19 patients in Zanjan, Iran. Given the fact that less than 10% of the patients experience co-infections, but over 70% receive antibiotics (10, 11), it is necessary to obtain regional data on superinfections in COVID-19 patients in order to limit the overuse of antibiotics and develop efficient antimicrobial therapy guidelines. In this cross-sectional study, 8.1% of the patients who were hospitalized in two major Zanjan hospitals over a one-year period, experienced bacterial and/or fungal co-infections. Lansbury et al. (12) conducted a meta-analysis on the burden of co-infections in COVID-19 patients by including 30 studies and 3834 hospitalized patients. They reported an overall 7% bacterial co-infection in the patients which is almost in consistence with our study. Rawson et al. (11) also conducted a study on the coronavirus-associated superinfections. The results were indicative of an 8% (62 of 806 patients) bacterial and fungal co-infection rate in COVID-19 patients which is consistent with our study. In general, older ages are associated with higher rates of COVID-19 morbidity, mortality and subsequently, co-infection occurrence (13). Our results were indicative of higher risk for severe illness and higher rates of bacterial and fungal co-infections in older patients and negligible risk for patients aging less than 20. According to our data, only 11 patients aging from 0-20 years were hospitalized due to COVID-19 during this period, from whom only one patient deceased. Co-infections were the most prevalent among patients aging from 60 to 70. This data is in accordance with a previously conducted study by Sharifpour et al. (14), which reported an average age of 67 for the COVID-19 patients with bacterial co-infections of the respiratory tract. Superinfections have been reported to be dominant in males in similar studies (14–16). However, females consisted a greater portion of the population in this study. This is probably due to the inclusion of urinary tract infections in this study, which are more common in women, and the focus of the most of the other conducted studies on respiratory tract and blood infections. Severe COVID-19 is associated with high rates of admission to the ICU (17). ICU admission rate in the patients included in our study was 55.8%. Chronic respiratory diseases, immuno-inflammatory response, corticosteroid therapy, and mechanical ventilation are the main risk factors for bacterial and fungal co-infections in ICU-admitted patients. In this study, 70% of the patients had at least one underlying disease with hypertension and diabetes being the most frequent ones. This is aligned with the results of other similar studies (16, 17). Co-infections were not significantly associated with respiratory comorbidities compared to other types of comorbidities (P=0.361). Bacterial and fungal co-infections were associated with longer lengths of stay, which has been observed in previous studies (16, 18, 19). This is mainly because hospital-acquired infections are more likely to occur in patients with a longer hospitalization period. Coinfected patients had poorer prognosis with a mortality rate of 58.4%, while mortality rate in non-coinfected patients was 12.2%. After conducting a meta-analysis including four studies providing data on 852 patients, Martins-Filho et al. (20) reported a 2.5-fold increase of the COVID-19-associated lethality risk in patients coinfected with bacteria and fungi, which is a smaller ratio compared to the 4.7- fold increase observed in our study. In this study, blood, urine, and respiratory tract cultures were respectively ordered for 472 (9.2%), 2132 (41.6%) and 242 (4.6%) patients. A global crisis is whether initial challenges regarding the management of COVID-19 have potentially reduced the requests for microbiologic tests from the physicians. We are concerned about the quality and quantity of performed microbiologic tests and their authentic documentation. Ever since the first COVID-19 case appeared, some regional studies have highlighted the burden of bacterial and fungal co-infections in the pandemic considering the responsible microorganisms and AMR patterns. In Qom, Iran, Sharifpour et al. reported a 100% respiratory bacterial co-infection rate in 19 ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients. A. baumannii was the most prevalent organism isolated from 90% of the patients and 10% of the cases were confirmed with S. aureus co-infection (14). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in this study revealed that A. baumannii isolates were highly resistant of to all tested antibiotics, except for colistin with a 52% resistance rate. Methicillin resistance was reported in 25% of the S. aureus samples. Similarly, A. baumannii was the most prevalent isolated bacteria from the respiratory samples of patients in this study and colistin was reported to be the most effective antibiotic as well with a sensitivity rate of 97.85%. Methicillin resistance in our study nevertheless, was estimated at 12%. Neto et al. conducted a retrospective analysis on bacterial genitourinary, skin and respiratory infections and antibiotic use patterns in 242 COVID-19 patients. The rate of concomitant bacterial infection was 19%, having E. coli as the most frequently isolated organism (26%). E. coli was also the most prevalent organism in the urine samples of our patient population (64%). Ceftriaxone (54%), vancomycin (48%), azithromycin (47%), and cefepime (45%) were among the most prescribed antibiotics in the mentioned study (15). Among the antibiotics in this list however, only vancomycin had a promising performance in our study with a sensitivity rate of 68%. A study by Garcia-Vidal et al. assessed the incidence of respiratory, blood and urine co-infections in 989 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Barcelona, Spain. A total number of 88 non-COVID-19 infections were confirmed including 74 bacterial, seven fungal and seven viral co-infections. The most common isolated bacteria were S. pneumoniae (12 cases) and S. aureus (12 cases) (21). In 2020, Kamaliaghdam et al. reported that E. coli strains isolated from the urine samples of hospitalized patients in Zanjan are highly sensitive to nitrofurantoin with a 4.5% resistance rate. E. coli showed the highest resistance to cefixime (34.9%). This is in accordance with our findings, which were indicative of an 85.29% nitrofurantoin sensitivity rate and an 86.76% cefixime resistance rate in E. coli strains isolated from the urine samples (22). Keihanian et al. evaluated the epidemiology of antibiotic resistance of blood cultures in educational hospitals in Rasht, Iran, in 2018. P. aeruginosa 29.3% was the most prevalent organism in patients with septicemia. Ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin were respectively the most resistant (44%) and the most sensitive (54%) antibiotics in this study (23). This result is different from that of our study. Differences in the types of isolated bacteria and AMR patterns are probably due to different geographical distribution of bacteria and antibiotic regimens in different regions. Exclusively applying biochemical tests for bacterial identification and not determining resistance-associated genes are the limitations of this study.

CONCLUSION

It is essential to conduct further studies on the prevalence of bacterial co-infections and possible interactions between COVID-19 and AMR. Realizing how AMR trends are affected by COVID-19 and tracking the alterations in these trends are of great help in tackling AMR and developing rapid and efficient diagnostic, therapeutic and disinfection strategies in order to control these infections in the hospitals. Medical settings need to take more measures to identify the COVID-19 patients with bacterial and fungal co-infections who might benefit from antibiotics.
  16 in total

1.  Coronavirus Disease 2019, Superinfections, and Antimicrobial Development: What Can We Expect?

Authors:  Cornelius J Clancy; M Hong Nguyen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Detection of respiratory bacterial pathogens causing atypical pneumonia by multiplex Lightmix® RT-PCR.

Authors:  Karoline Wagner; Burkard Springer; Frank Imkamp; Onya Opota; Gilbert Greub; Peter M Keller
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  Prevalence of Co-infection at the Time of Hospital Admission in COVID-19 Patients, A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Sara M Karaba; George Jones; Taylor Helsel; L Leigh Smith; Robin Avery; Kathryn Dzintars; Alejandra B Salinas; Sara C Keller; Jennifer L Townsend; Eili Klein; Joe Amoah; Brian T Garibaldi; Sara E Cosgrove; Valeria Fabre
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.835

4.  The clinical impact of bacterial co-infection among moderate, severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients in the second referral hospital in Surabaya.

Authors:  Tri Pudy Asmarawati; Alfian Nur Rosyid; Satriyo Dwi Suryantoro; Bagus Aulia Mahdi; Choirina Windradi; Prastuti Asta Wulaningrum; Muhammad Vitanata Arifianto; Bramantono Bramantono; Erwin Astha Triyono; Musofa Rusli; Brian Eka Rachman; Erika Marfiani; Pepy Dwi Endraswari; Usman Hadi; Kuntaman Kuntaman; Nasronudin Nasronudin
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-02-15

5.  Epidemiology of antibiotic resistance of blood culture in educational hospitals in Rasht, North of Iran.

Authors:  Fatemeh Keihanian; Amin Saeidinia; Keivan Abbasi; Faeze Keihanian
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Evaluation of bacterial co-infections of the respiratory tract in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU.

Authors:  Ehsan Sharifipour; Saeed Shams; Mohammad Esmkhani; Javad Khodadadi; Reza Fotouhi-Ardakani; Alireza Koohpaei; Zahra Doosti; Samad Ej Golzari
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Incidence of co-infections and superinfections in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Carolina Garcia-Vidal; Gemma Sanjuan; Estela Moreno-García; Pedro Puerta-Alcalde; Nicole Garcia-Pouton; Mariana Chumbita; Mariana Fernandez-Pittol; Cristina Pitart; Alexy Inciarte; Marta Bodro; Laura Morata; Juan Ambrosioni; Ignacio Grafia; Fernanda Meira; Irene Macaya; Celia Cardozo; Climent Casals; Adrian Tellez; Pedro Castro; Francesc Marco; Felipe García; Josep Mensa; José Antonio Martínez; Alex Soriano
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  Bacterial coinfection in critically ill COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia.

Authors:  Alexandre Elabbadi; Matthieu Turpin; Grigoris T Gerotziafas; Marion Teulier; Guillaume Voiriot; Muriel Fartoukh
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Nosocomial infections associated to COVID-19 in the intensive care unit: clinical characteristics and outcome.

Authors:  Tommaso Bardi; Vicente Pintado; Maria Gomez-Rojo; Rosa Escudero-Sanchez; Amal Azzam Lopez; Yolanda Diez-Remesal; Nilda Martinez Castro; Patricia Ruiz-Garbajosa; David Pestaña
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Bacterial infections and patterns of antibiotic use in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Alvaro Goncalves Mendes Neto; Kevin Bryan Lo; Ammaar Wattoo; Grace Salacup; Jerald Pelayo; Robert DeJoy; Ruchika Bhargav; Fahad Gul; Eric Peterson; Jeri Albano; Gabriel Patarroyo-Aponte; Janani Rangaswami; Zurab Azmaiparashvili
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 20.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.