| Literature DB >> 35222403 |
Xueting Kong1, Jiamian Zheng1, Xiaxin Liu1, Wandi Wang1, Xuan Jiang1, Jie Chen2, Jing Lai2, Zhenyi Jin1,3, Xiuli Wu1.
Abstract
Background: Heterogeneous T cells in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have the combinatorial variety generated by different T cell receptors (TCRs). γδ T cells are a distinct subgroup of T cells containing TCRγ (TRGV) and TCRδ (TRDV) subfamilies with diverse structural and functional heterogeneity. Our previous study showed that clonally expanded TRDV T cells might benefit the immune response directed against AML. However, the features of the TRGV repertoire in AML remain unknown. To fully characterize the features of γδ T cells, we analyzed the distribution and clonality of TRGV I-III subfamilies (TRGV II is also termed TRVG 9), the proportions of γδ T cell subsets, and their effects on the overall survival (OS) of patients with AML.Entities:
Keywords: TRGV repertoire; acute myeloid leukemia; clonality; prognosis; γδ T cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35222403 PMCID: PMC8866455 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.823352
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Clinical characteristics of AML patients.
| Factor | AML |
|---|---|
| Number | 75 |
| Age (median; range) | 48 (18-88) |
| Gender (Male/Female) | 42/33 |
| WBC (×109/L), (median; range) | 23.10 (1-325.42) |
| RBC (×1012/L), (median; range) | 2.51 (1.28-5.67) |
| PLT (×109/L), (median; range) | 44.1 (4-632) |
| BM blast cells (%), (median; range) | 63 (20-94) |
| FAB subtype (n=75) | |
| M0 | 6 |
| M1 | 2 |
| M2 | 16 |
| M3 | 12 |
| M4 | 9 |
| M5 | 18 |
| M6 | / |
| M7 | / |
| Undetermined | 12 |
| Gene mutation | |
|
| 12/63 |
| 9/66 | |
| 8/67 | |
| 6/69 | |
| 4/71 | |
| 5/70 | |
| Others (+/-) | 9/66 |
| Unknown (+/-) | 29/46 |
| Cytogenetic abnormality | |
| Normal (+/-) | 6/69 |
| Abnormal (+/-) | 25/50 |
| Unknown (+/-) | 44/31 |
| Treatment | |
| Chemotherapy (+/-) | 66/9 |
| HSCT (+/-) | 9/66 |
AML, acute myeloid leukemia; WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; PLT, platelet; BM blast cells, bone marrow blast cells; FAB, French-American-British; M0, minimally differentiated AML; M1, AML without maturation; M2, AML with maturation; M3, acute promyelocytic leukemia; M4, acute myelomonocytic leukemia; M5, acute monocytic leukemia; M6, pure erythroid leukemia; M7, Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; /, unknown.
Sequences of primers used in RT-PCR and qPCR.
| Primer | Sequence |
|---|---|
|
| 5’-TACCTACACCAGGAGGGGAAG-3’ |
|
| 5’-GGCACTGTCAGAAAGGAATC-3’ |
|
| 5’-TCGACGCAGCATGGGTAAGAC-3’ |
| Cγ | 5’- GTTGCTCTTCTTTTCTTGCC-3’ |
| Cγ-FAM | 5’-FAM-CATCTGCATCAAGTTGTTTATC-3’ |
| 5’-TACACTGAATTCACCCCCAC-3’ | |
| 5’-CATCCAATCCAAATGCGGCA-3’ |
Figure 1Distribution and clonality of TRGV subfamilies in γδ T cells from 10 healthy individuals and 30 patients with AML. The feature of distribution and clonality of TRGV subfamilies in healthy individuals and patients with AML (A, B). Expression pattern of TRGV subfamilies in one case of healthy individual and six AML patients (C, D). P, polyclonality; O, oligoclonality; N, negative.
Figure 2Frequencies of the TRGV subfamilies in γδ T cells from 10 healthy individuals and 30 patients with AML. The expression frequencies of three TRGV subfamilies in healthy individuals and patients with AML (using the Fisher’s exact test) (A–C). The clonal expansion frequency of the three TRGV subfamilies in healthy individuals and patients with AML (using the Fisher’s exact test) (D–F). P, polyclonality; O, oligoclonality; N, negative.
Figure 3Pattern of expression levels of three TRGV subfamilies in γδ T cells from 33 cases with healthy individuals and 56 cases with AML (using the Mann Whitney test) (A–C). Correlations among three TRGV subfamilies in 33 healthy individuals and 56 patients with AML (using the Pearson correlation analysis) (D–F). Heatmap representing the expression levels of three TRGV subfamilies in 33 healthy individuals and 56 patients with AML (G).
Figure 4Gating strategy for identifying the percentage of γδ T cells from PB in 18 HIs and 19 patients with AML. Flow cytometry detection of the percentage of CD3+ γδ T cells and Vγ9+ Vδ2+ T cells in HIs (A, B) and patients with AML (C, D). The percentage of γδ T cells in HIs and patients with AML (using the Mann Whitney test) (E). Comparison of the percentages of Vγ9+ Vδ2+ T cells in HIs and patients with AML (using the Mann Whitney test) (F).
Univariate and multivariate logistic and cox regression analysis in AML patients.
| Variables | Univariate logistic regression | Multivariate logistic regression | Univariate cox regression | Multivariate cox regression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | OR | HR | HR | |||||
| (95% CI) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | |||||
| Sex (reference male) | ||||||||
| Female | 0.923 (0.297, 2.865) | 0.890 | 0.212 (0.026, 1.697) | 0.144 | 1.602 (0.617, 4.158) | 0.333 | 0.957 (0.314, 2.919) | 0.938 |
| Age (year) | 1.034 (0.999, 1.070) | 0.059 | 1.064 (1.000, 1.134) | 0.052 | 1.016 (0.985, 1.049) | 0.309 | 1.002 (0.964, 1.042) | 0.915 |
| WBC, 109/L | 1.013 (1.002, 1.024) | 0.023 | 1.010 (0.991, 1.029) | 0.325 | 1.010 (1.004, 1.015) | 0.001 | 1.009 (1.000, 1.018) | 0.059 |
| RBC, 1012/L | 1.139 (0.599, 2.168) | 0.691 | 4.044 (0.797, 20.528) | 0.092 | 0.896 (0.512, 1.568) | 0.700 | 3.049 (1.093, 8.503) | 0.033 |
| PLT, 109/L | 1.000 (0.994, 1.006) | 0.975 | 1.001 (0.992, 1.010) | 0.824 | 1.000 (0.995, 1.005) | 0.984 | 1.004 (0.996, 1.012) | 0.341 |
| BM blast cell, % | 1.002 (0.972, 1.033) | 0.905 | 1.024 (0.974, 1.075) | 0.354 | 1.007 (0.981, 1.034) | 0.592 | 1.008 (0.973, 1.045) | 0.653 |
| FAB subtype (reference non-M3) | ||||||||
| M3-AML | 4.275 (0.816, 22.390) | 0.086 | 1.071 (0.045, 25.315) | 0.966 | 7.845 (1.028, 59.865) | 0.047 | 4.584 (0.197, 106.861) | 0.343 |
| Gene mutation (reference non- | ||||||||
| 0.404 (0.073, 2.235) | 0.299 | 0.126 (0.009, 1.711) | 0.120 | 1.475 (0.48, 4.532) | 0.497 | 1.937 (0.373, 10.060) | 0.431 | |
| Treatment (reference chemotherapy) | ||||||||
| HSCT | 0.800 (0.169, 3.793) | 0.779 | 0.904 (0.110, 7.427) | 0.925 | 0.438 (0.099, 1.932) | 0.276 | 0.294 (0.032, 2.656) | 0.275 |
|
| 0.211 (0.062, 0.711) | 0.012 | 1.243 (0.086, 17.973) | 0.873 | 0.258 (0.084, 0.794) | 0.018 | 0.552 (0.026, 11.652) | 0.703 |
|
| 0.211 (0.062, 0.711) | 0.012 | 0.079 (0.007, 0.831) | 0.035* | 0.111 (0.025, 0.488) | 0.004 | 0.084 (0.007, 0.979) | 0.048* |
|
| 0.141 (0.039, 0.504) | 0.003 | 0.069 (0.004, 1.161) | 0.063 | 0.283 (0.092, 0.871) | 0.028 | 1.221 (0.067, 22.238) | 0.893 |
AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CR, complete remission; OS, overall survival; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; PLT, platelet; M3, acute promyelocytic leukemia; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. *P < 0.05.
Figure 5Overall survival (OS) analysis of the gene expression levels of three TRGV subfamilies in 50 AML patients and the percentages of Vγ9+ Vδ2+ T cells in 18 AML patients. Kaplan–Meier curves showed the OS for the high (blue line) and low (red line) TRGV expression groups (A–C). Kaplan–Meier curves showed the OS for the co-high expression (blue line), single high expression (green line), and co-low expression (red line) of TRGV I, TRGV 9 and TRGV III (D). Kaplan–Meier curves showed the OS for the high (blue line) and low (red line) percentages of Vγ9+ Vδ2+ T cells (E).