Relationship Between the Hemoglobin-to-Red Cell Distribution Width Ratio and All-Cause Mortality in Ischemic Stroke Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: An Analysis from the MIMIC-IV Database.

AIM: To investigate the association between the hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width (RDW) ratio (HRR) and all-cause mortality in ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
DESIGN: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis. In total, 1018 ischemic stroke patients with AF were enrolled using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database, (MIMIC)-IV. The patients were divided into four groups according to the HRR values. The primary outcome was 180-day all-cause mortality.
METHODS: Multivariate Cox proportional risk regression models were used to examine the association between HRR and all-cause mortality. The non-linear relationship between HRR and all-cause mortality was confirmed using a Cox proportional risk regression model fitted by cubic spline function and smooth curve fitting.
RESULTS: A total of 246/1018 patients (24.17%) died. The serum HRR values were negatively associated with 180-day all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.94). A two-piecewise regression model was used to obtain a threshold inflection point value of 9.74. The HR and the 95% CI on the left inflection point were 0.73 and 0.61-0.87 (p = 0.0005); on the right inflection point they were 1.06 and 0.82-1.38 (p = 0.6383).
CONCLUSION: The relationship between all-cause mortality and the HRR values was non-linear in ischemic stroke patients with AF. All-cause mortality and HRR values were negatively correlated when the HRR value was ≤9.74.

Introduction

According to the report of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017, strokes are the second leading cause of death and disability worldwide.1 In recent decades, the incidence and mortality rates of ischemic strokes have declined progressively in high income countries but have not changed or have increased in many low and middle income countries.2 AF is one of the most common cardiac arrhythmias and has become a global health interest as its prevalence and associated mortality have grown exponentially in the past decade.3 Strokes are common in patients with AF; AF also increases the risk of a systemic embolism.4 AF is a powerful risk factor for strokes, independently increasing the risk by approximately 5 times in all ages.5 Ischemic strokes with AF are associated with mortality or a significantly higher disability, particularly in older patients.6 In recent years, a series of studies on the HRR and prognosis of cancer patients have been reported,7–10 and a few studies on the HRR and prognosis of coronary heart disease patients have been reported.11 So far, However, there is no relevant report studies HRR on the prognosis of severe ischemic stroke patients with AF and the correlation of adverse events. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first studies using the MIMIC-IV database to research the results of ischemic strokes combined with AF. Using the US MIMIC-IV database (version 1.0),12 we conducted the prognosis and related of severely ill ischemic stroke patients with AF as a large sample retrospective analysis.

Materials and Methods

Data Source

This study was a retrospective cohort analysis using the MIMIC-IV database (version 1.0). This database was identified according to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Safe Harbor provision and has approval from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Institutional Review Board of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC).13 The MIMIC-IV database contains the clinical information of patients who were in the intensive care unit (ICU) at BIDMC between 2008 and 2019. One author, Zuoan Qin, completed the Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative examination (certification number: 36208651) to achieve access to the database for the data extraction.

Study Population and Variable Extraction

The total number of outpatients and inpatients listed in the MIMIC-IV database was 257,366 individuals in 2008–2019 with 50,048 patients admitted to the ICU. Only the 2700 patients diagnosed with an ischemic stroke were considered for this research. Among those patients, the inclusion criteria were: adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with an ischemic stroke defined as ICD-9 codes of 4660, 34,661, 34,662, 34,663, 43,301, 43,311, 43,321, 43,331, 43,381, 43,391, 43,401, 43,411 and 43,491; or ICD-10 codes of I63. The exclusion criteria were: age < 18 years old; patients receiving acute reperfusion therapy; and patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy surgery.All experiments were performed following The First People’s Hospital of Changde City and national guidelines and regulations, and the experiment was approved by the ethics committee of The First People’s Hospital of Changde City.

Definition of HRR and the Outcome Measurement

The HRR is defined using the following equation: HRR = hemoglobin (g/L)/RDW (109/L).7–11 The primary outcome was set to all-cause mortality within 180 days. The secondary results were all-cause mortality within 30, 60 and 90 days. The survival information was obtained from a table named “patients” in the MIMIC-IV database. The length of stay data were extracted from the table named “admissions”. The variables in this study included characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory variables, a severity scoring system, drug use, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS) (days) and time of death. The patient characteristics were collected as follows:

(1) Characteristics: age, gender, heart rate (beats/minute), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (mmHg), respiratory rate (breath/minute), temperature (◦C), saturation of peripheral oxygen (SPO2) (%);

(2) Comorbidities: hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), dementia, severe liver disease, rheumatoid arthritis, malignancy, a metastatic solid tumor, paraplegia, peptic ulcer disease, chronic pulmonary disease;

(3) The first value of vital signs and laboratory data within 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission laboratory parameters: white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC), red cell distribution width (RDW), hemoglobin, platelets, international normalized ratio (INR), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), aspartate aminotransferase (ALT), alanine aminotransferase (AST), creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), anion gap, bicarbonate, calcium, chloride, potassium, sodium, glucose;

(4) Severity scoring system: sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, simplified acute physiology score (APS) III, simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), Oxford acute severity of illness score (OASIS), HAS-BLED score;

(5) Drug use: warfarin, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), antiplatelet agents;

(6) Intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS) (days) and 30, 60, 90 and 180-day all-cause mortality.

Statistical Analysis

In the first step, we listed the baseline data of the participants (Table 1). The continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The classification variables were expressed as a frequency and a percentage. In the second step, a one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) test (normal distribution) or a Kruskal–Wallis H-test (skew distribution) was used to detect the difference between the different HRRs (four quantiles). We used univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models to build three different models including a crude model (unadjusted for covariates), model 1 (adjusted for age and gender only) and model 2 (adjusted for potential confounding factors).We used weighted univariate and multivariate logistic regression models based on the recommendations of the STROBE statement. We also demonstrated the results of an unadjusted, a minimum adjusted and a fully adjusted analysis. Whether to adjust the covariance or not was determined by the following principle: when added to the model, the matching odds ratio was changed by at least 10%. In addition, we also used the generalized additive model (GAM) to identify the non-linear relationships. If a non-linear correlation was observed, we performed a two-piece linear regression model to calculate the threshold effect of the HRR on all-cause mortality based on the smoothed graph. When the ratio of the HRR to the all-cause mortality was obvious in the smooth curve, the recursive method automatically calculated the inflection point and the maximum model likelihood was used. A hierarchical linear regression model was used for the subgroup analysis.

Table 1

Baseline Characteristics

	HRR				P-value
	Q1(2.20–6.51)	Q2(6.52–8.35)	Q3(8.36–9.84)	Q4(9.85–15.83)
	(n=255)	(n=254)	(n=254)	(n=255)
Characteristic
Age, (year)	77.86 ± 11.14	78.74 ± 10.89	78.95 ± 10.66	74.53 ± 12.26	<0.001
Gender, n (%)					<0.001
Female	153 (60.00%)	146 (57.48%)	151 (59.45%)	111 (43.53%)
Male	102 (40.00%)	108 (42.52%)	103 (40.55%)	144 (56.47%)
Heart rate (beats/minute)	89.78 ± 21.79	86.29 ± 19.38	82.70 ± 20.41	88.07 ± 22.99	0.001
MAP (mmHg)	85.30 ± 20.80	87.79 ± 18.09	94.36 ± 18.53	97.46 ± 18.18	<0.001
Respiratory rate (breath/minute)	20.16 ± 6.82	19.82 ± 5.72	18.86 ± 5.20	19.41 ± 5.53	0.073
Temperature (◦ C)	36.68 ± 0.80	36.66 ± 0.79	36.74 ± 0.65	36.74 ± 0.67	0.458
SPO2 (%)	97.31 ± 4.26	96.70 ± 4.41	96.87 ± 3.49	96.80 ± 3.29	0.305
Comorbidities,n (%)
Hypertension	99 (38.82%)	123 (48.43%)	137 (53.94%)	161 (63.14%)	<0.001
Hyperlipidemia	142 (55.69%)	126 (49.61%)	144 (56.69%)	157 (61.57%)	0.058
Diabetes mellitus	71 (27.84%)	67 (26.38%)	71 (27.95%)	68 (26.67%)	0.969
Congestive heart failure	141 (55.29%)	112 (44.09%)	91 (35.83%)	80 (31.37%)	<0.001
Myocardial infarct	62 (24.31%)	47 (18.50%)	43 (16.93%)	38 (14.90%)	0.041
PVD	52 (20.39%)	49 (19.29%)	25 (9.84%)	23 (9.02%)	<0.001
Dementia	18 (7.06%)	19 (7.48%)	17 (6.69%)	11 (4.31%)	0.462
Severe liver disease	7 (2.75%)	2 (0.79%)	0 (0.00%)	0 (0.00%)	0.002
Rheumatoid arthritis	22 (8.63%)	9 (3.54%)	6 (2.36%)	4 (1.57%)	<0.001
Malignancy	38 (14.90%)	16 (6.30%)	14 (5.51%)	15 (5.88%)	<0.001
Metastatic solid tumor	11 (4.31%)	11 (4.33%)	6 (2.36%)	6 (2.35%)	0.385
Paraplegia	125 (49.02%)	127 (50.00%)	151 (59.45%)	141 (55.29%)	0.064
Peptic ulcer disease	9 (3.53%)	6 (2.36%)	3 (1.18%)	3 (1.18%)	0.187
Chronic pulmonary dis	66 (25.88%)	52 (20.47%)	52 (20.47%)	44 (17.25%)	0.117
Laboratory parameters
WBC (109/L)	11.86 ± 10.01	11.04 ± 4.55	10.62 ± 4.54	11.32 ± 4.36	0.164
RBC (1012/L)	3.10 ± 0.66	3.69 ± 0.52	4.21 ± 0.47	4.70 ± 0.49	<0.001
Hemoglobin (g/L)	87.60 ± 15.09	109.81 ± 10.92	126.83 ± 8.95	145.16 ± 12.39	<0.001
RDW(109/L)	17.20 ± 2.86	14.73 ± 1.29	13.99 ± 0.87	13.25 ± 0.83	<0.001
Platelet (109/L)	218.31± 139.91	218.78 ± 102.11	211.72 ± 69.64	226.57 ± 85.83	0.446
INR	1.65 ± 1.37	1.44 ± 0.69	1.39 ± 0.85	1.26 ± 0.42	<0.001
PT (seconds)	17.91 ± 13.74	15.74 ± 7.30	15.16 ± 8.98	13.86 ± 4.33	<0.001
APTT (seconds)	39.24 ± 25.91	33.13 ± 15.79	34.14 ± 19.66	31.12 ± 13.16	<0.001
ALT (U/L)	58.53 ± 178.83	72.36 ± 291.83	55.27 ± 205.83	33.08 ± 47.05	0.334
AST (U/L)	89.45 ± 307.86	138.96 ± 666.67	81.18 ± 270.52	49.22 ± 93.55	0.206
Creatinine (mEq/L)	1.77 ± 1.81	1.38 ± 1.16	1.15 ± 0.87	1.07 ± 0.77	<0.001
BUN (mg/dL)	33.44 ± 21.41	26.08 ± 15.30	23.52 ± 14.81	20.76 ± 11.36	<0.001
Anion gap (mmol/L)	15.07 ± 4.70	15.49 ± 3.95	15.49 ± 4.05	16.32 ± 4.12	0.008
Bicarbonate (mmol/L)	22.43 ± 4.83	23.36 ± 4.01	23.46 ± 3.73	22.97 ± 3.79	0.021
Calcium (mg/dl)	8.32 ± 1.01	8.60 ± 0.85	8.74 ± 0.65	8.86 ± 0.71	<0.001
Chloride (mmol/L)	104.29 ± 6.52	102.77 ± 6.29	103.23 ± 4.90	102.80 ± 5.22	0.009
Potassium (mmol/L)	4.37 ± 0.87	4.22 ± 0.67	4.29 ± 0.82	4.21 ± 0.77	0.113
Sodium (mmol/L)	138.88 ± 4.88	138.60 ± 4.59	139.43 ± 4.68	139.26 ± 4.19	0.179
Glucose (mg/dL)	143.19 ± 65.33	142.31 ± 56.71	144.06 ± 82.99	152.44 ± 74.25	0.343
Drugs use,n (%)
Warfarin	116 (45.49%)	88 (34.65%)	89 (35.04%)	82 (32.16%)	0.009
NOAC	56 (21.96%)	51 (20.08%)	80 (31.50%)	81 (31.76%)	0.002
Antiplatelet agents	197 (77.25%)	197 (77.56%)	181 (71.26%)	182 (71.37%)	0.175
Scoring systems
APSIII	62.23 ± 25.80	54.85 ± 25.08	47.02 ± 21.42	45.78 ± 22.94	<0.001
SAPSII	45.26 ± 12.55	40.15 ± 11.55	36.80 ± 10.15	34.80 ± 12.05	<0.001
OASIS	38.20 ± 9.37	36.67 ± 8.81	34.74 ± 8.88	34.32 ± 8.92	<0.001
SOFA	6.95 ± 3.88	5.77 ± 4.02	4.31 ± 2.87	3.98 ± 3.18	<0.001
HAS-BLED score	1.59 ± 0.85	1.71 ± 0.92	1.76 ± 0.92	1.72 ± 0.97	0.189
ICU LOS (days)	7.39 ± 9.30	7.02 ± 9.61	5.27 ± 5.13	5.54 ± 6.33	0.003
Die, n (%)
Within 30 days	70 (27.45%)	67 (26.38%)	41 (16.14%)	46 (18.04%)	0.002
Within 60 days	78 (30.59%)	70 (27.56%)	41 (16.14%)	48 (18.82%)	<0.001
Within 90 days	81 (31.76%)	71 (27.95%)	42 (16.54%)	49 (19.22%)	<0.001
Within 180 days	83 (32.55%)	72 (28.35%)	42 (16.54%)	49 (19.22%)	<0.001

Abbreviations: BUN, blood urea nitrogen; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; SpO2, saturation of peripheral oxygen; WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; RDW, red cell distribution width; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; APTT, Activated partial thromboplastin time; PT, Prothrombin Time; INR, international normalized ratio; NOAC, novel oral anticoagulant; APS III, acute physiology score III; SAPSII, simplified acute physiology score II; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; OASIS, oxford acute severity of illness score; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment score; ICU LOS, Intensive care unit length of stay.

We used the statistical packages R (The R Foundation; ; version 3.4.3) and Empower Stats (; X&Y Solutions, Inc.) to perform the whole process of the data analysis.

Results

Selection of Participants

The study included 2700 patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit due to an ischemic stroke for the first time, of which 1682 were excluded from the study. Of those excluded, 1674 patients had no history of AF and 8 patients were without hemoglobin or RDW data. A total of 1018 participants were selected for the final data analysis (see the flowchart in Figure 1).

Figure 1

Flowchart of subject screening.

Baseline Characteristics

The 1018 patients (aged ≥ 18 years) were aged 77.52 ± 11.38 years and comprised 561 (55.1%) females. Of the 1018 patients, 246 (24.17%) died within 180 days. According to the HRR values, 255, 254, 254 and 255 patients belonged to the Q1 (≥ 2.20 and < 6.51), Q2 (≥ 6.52 and < 8.35), Q3 (≥ 8.36 and < 9.84) and Q4 (≥ 9.85 and < 15.83) categories, respectively. The difference group was evaluated by the Pearson χ2 test for the binary variables and the t-test for the continuous variables. The continuous variables were expressed in the form of mean ± standard deviation (SD) and the binary variables were expressed in the form of counts and proportions. All variables are listed in Table 1.

Univariate Analysis

Table 2 shows the results of the univariate analysis that indicated that the age (p = 0.0001), WBC (p = 0.0165), RDW (p = 0.0007), BUN (p = 0.0002), anion gap (p = 0.0001), APSIII (p < 0.0001), SAPSII (p < 0.0001), OASIS (p < 0.0001), SOFA (p = 0.0002), malignancy (p = 0.0052), metastatic solid tumor (p = 0.0034) and respiratory rate (p = 0.0002) positively correlated with mortality. HRR (p =0.0144), Hyperlipidemia (p = 0.0364), warfarin use (p < 0.0001), NOAC drug use (p < 0.0001), antiplatelet agent drug use (p < 0.0001), SPO2 (%) (p = 0.0002) and ICU LOS (p < 0.0001) negatively correlated with mortality.

Table 2

Factors Correlated to All-Cause Mortality in HRR by Univariate Analysis

Death	Statistics	HR(95% CI), P- value
HRR	8.17 ± 2.26	0.93 (0.88, 0.99) 0.0144
Gender
Female	561 (55.11%)	1.0
Male	457 (44.89%)	1.06 (0.82, 1.36) 0.6642
Age, (year)	77.52 ± 11.38	1.02 (1.01, 1.04) 0.0001
WBC (109/L)	11.21 ± 6.35	1.01 (1.00, 1.03) 0.0165
RBC (1012/L)	3.93 ± 0.81	0.94 (0.81, 1.10) 0.4380
Hemoglobin (g/L)	117.35 ± 24.44	1.00 (0.99, 1.00) 0.2749
RDW(109/L)	14.79 ± 2.24	1.08 (1.03, 1.13) 0.0007
Platelet (109/L)	218.85 ± 102.75	1.00 (1.00, 1.00) 0.0783
INR	1.44 ± 0.91	1.02 (0.91, 1.15) 0.6953
PT (seconds)	15.67 ± 9.35	1.00 (0.99, 1.01) 0.5630
APTT (seconds)	34.42 ± 19.47	1.00 (0.99, 1.00) 0.6716
ALT (U/L)	53.78 ± 196.60	1.00 (1.00, 1.00) 0.9026
AST (U/L)	87.29 ± 380.33	1.00 (1.00, 1.00) 0.7251
Creatinine (mEq/L)	1.34 ± 1.25	1.05 (0.98, 1.12) 0.1474
BUN (mg/dL)	25.94 ± 16.78	1.01 (1.00, 1.02) 0.0002
Anion gap (mmol/L)	15.59 ± 4.23	1.05 (1.02, 1.07) 0.0001
Bicarbonate (mmol/L)	23.05 ± 4.13	0.98 (0.95, 1.01) 0.1636
Calcium (mg/dl)	8.63 ± 0.84	1.06 (0.92, 1.21) 0.4253
Chloride (mmol/L)	103.27 ± 5.80	0.99 (0.97, 1.01) 0.4652
Potassium (mmol/L)	4.27 ± 0.78	1.09 (0.95, 1.26) 0.2301
Sodium (mmol/L)	139.05 ± 4.60	1.02 (0.99, 1.04) 0.1883
Glucose (mg/dL)	145.52 ± 70.60	1.00 (1.00, 1.00) 0.2510
Hypertension
No	498 (48.92%)	1.0
Yes	520 (51.08%)	0.83 (0.65, 1.07) 0.1582
Hyperlipidemia
No	449 (44.11%)	1.0
Yes	569 (55.89%)	0.77 (0.60, 0.98) 0.0364
Diabetes mellitus
No	741 (72.79%)	1.0
Yes	277 (27.21%)	0.89 (0.67, 1.19) 0.4275
Congestive heart failure
No	594 (58.35%)	1.0
Yes	424 (41.65%)	1.14 (0.89, 1.46) 0.3080
Myocardial infarct
No	828 (81.34%)	1.0
Yes	190 (18.66%)	1.21 (0.89, 1.62) 0.2206
PVD
No	869 (85.36%)	1.0
Yes	149 (14.64%)	1.26 (0.92, 1.72) 0.1540
Dementia
No	953 (93.61%)	1.0
Yes	65 (6.39%)	0.92 (0.55, 1.55) 0.7576
Severe liver disease
No	1009 (99.12%)	1.0
Yes	9 (0.88%)	1.41 (0.52, 3.78) 0.4983
Rheumatoid arthritis
No	989 (97.15%)	1.0
Yes	29 (2.85%)	0.97 (0.43, 2.20) 0.9512
Malignancy
No	935 (91.85%)	1.0
Yes	83 (8.15%)	1.70 (1.17, 2.46) 0.0052
Metastatic solid tumor
No	984 (96.66%)	1.0
Yes	34 (3.34%)	2.19 (1.30, 3.69) 0.0034
Paraplegia
No	474 (46.56%)	1.0
Yes	544 (53.44%)	0.94 (0.73, 1.21) 0.6414
Peptic ulcer disease
No	997 (97.94%)	1.0
Yes	21 (2.06%)	0.47 (0.15, 1.47) 0.1943
Chronic pulmonary dis
No	804 (78.98%)	1.0
Yes	214 (21.02%)	1.00 (0.74, 1.34) 0.9765
Warfarin drugs use
No	643 (63.16%)	1.0
Yes	375 (36.84%)	0.23 (0.17, 0.33) <0.0001
NOAC drugs use
No	750 (73.67%)	1.0
Yes	268 (26.33%)	0.20 (0.12, 0.34) <0.0001
Antiplatelet agents drugs use
No	261 (25.64%)	1.0
Yes	757 (74.36%)	0.56 (0.43, 0.73) <0.0001
APSIII	52.47 ± 24.74	1.02 (1.01, 1.02) <0.0001
SAPSII	39.26 ± 12.25	1.03 (1.03, 1.04) <0.0001
OASIS	35.98 ± 9.12	1.05 (1.04, 1.06) <0.0001
SOFA	5.25 ± 3.71	1.06 (1.03, 1.09) 0.0002
HAS-BLED score	1.70 ± 0.92	1.01 (0.88, 1.15) 0.9174
Heart rate (beats/minute)	74.82 ± 19.86	1.00 (0.99, 1.01) 0.8977
MAP (mmHg)	91.23 ± 19.53	1.00 (0.99, 1.01) 0.7554
Respiratory rate (breath/minute)	19.56 ± 5.86	1.04 (1.02, 1.06) 0.0002
Temperature (◦ C)	36.70 ± 0.73	0.95 (0.80, 1.11) 0.5088
SPO2 (%)	96.92 ± 3.89	0.97 (0.94, 1.00) 0.0283
ICU LOS (days)	6.31 ± 7.87	0.96 (0.95, 0.98) <0.0001

Abbreviations: BUN, blood urea nitrogen; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; SpO2, saturation of peripheral oxygen; WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; RDW, red cell distribution width; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; APTT, Activated partial thromboplastin time; PT, Prothrombin Time; INR, international normalized ratio; NOAC, novel oral anticoagulant; APS III, acute physiology score III; SAPSII, simplified acute physiology score II; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; OASIS, oxford acute severity of illness score; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment score; ICU LOS, Intensive care unit length of stay.

The Association Between the HRR and All-Cause Mortality

Both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression models were introduced to evaluate the associations between the HRR and 30-day, 60-day, 60-day and 180-day mortality of in ischemic stroke patients with AF (Table 3). Meanwhile, we show the non-adjusted and adjusted models in Table 3. We found that lower the HRR was associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality (non-adjusted model: HR,0.95, 95% CI, 0.89–1.00, p = 0.0648; minimally-adjusted model: HR,0.95, 95% CI,0.90–1.01, p = 0.0811; fully-adjusted model: HR,0.79,95% CI,0.67–0.93, p = 0.0057),the same finding that lowering the HRR was associated with an increased risk of 60-day, 90-day, and 180-day mortality (Table 3). For the purpose of sensitivity analysis, we also treated the HRR as a categorical variable (the four quantiles) and discovered the same trend.

Table 3

Univariate and Multivariate Results by Cox Regression

Variable	Non-Adjusted (HR,95% CI, P-value)	Adjusted I (HR,95% CI, P-value)	Adjusted II (HR,95% CI, P-value)
30-day mortality HRR	0.95 (0.89, 1.00) 0.0648	0.95 (0.90, 1.01) 0.0811	0.79 (0.67, 0.93) 0.0057
HRR(quartile)
Q4(9.85–15.83)	1.0	1.0	1.0
Q3(8.36–9.84)	0.83 (0.55, 1.27) 0.3990	0.76 (0.50, 1.16) 0.2076	0.95 (0.52, 1.74) 0.8669
Q2(6.52–8.35)	1.31 (0.90, 1.91) 0.1568	1.24 (0.85, 1.81) 0.2593	1.70 (0.86, 3.37) 0.1285
Q1(2.20–6.51)	1.19 (0.82, 1.72) 0.3701	1.13 (0.78, 1.65) 0.5196	2.65 (1.12, 6.29) 0.0269
P for trend	1.10 (0.98, 1.24) 0.1159	1.09 (0.97, 1.23) 0.1462	1.44 (1.08, 1.91) 0.0125
60-day mortality HRR	0.94 (0.89, 0.99) 0.0313	0.94 (0.89, 0.99) 0.0322	0.80 (0.68, 0.94) 0.0060
HRR(quartile)
Q4(9.85–15.83)	1.0	1.0	1.0
Q3(8.36–9.84)	0.82 (0.54, 1.25) 0.3527	0.75 (0.49, 1.14) 0.1819	0.93 (0.51, 1.69) 0.8172
Q2(6.52–8.35)	1.29 (0.89, 1.86) 0.1811	1.23 (0.85, 1.77) 0.2775	1.46 (0.75, 2.85) 0.2615
Q1(2.20–6.51)	1.25 (0.87, 1.79) 0.2278	1.21 (0.84, 1.73) 0.3097	2.76 (1.20, 6.35) 0.0168
P for trend	1.12 (1.00, 1.25) 0.0589	1.12 (0.99, 1.25) 0.0651	1.43 (1.09, 1.89) 0.0112
90-day mortality HRR	0.94 (0.89, 0.99) 0.0248	0.94 (0.89, 0.99) 0.0219	0.80 (0.68, 0.94) 0.0070
HRR(quartile)
Q4(9.85–15.83)	1.0	1.0	1.0
Q3(8.36–9.84)	0.83 (0.55, 1.25) 0.3732	0.76 (0.50, 1.15) 0.1970	0.96 (0.53, 1.73) 0.8903
Q2(6.52–8.35)	1.27 (0.88, 1.82) 0.2063	1.22 (0.85, 1.76) 0.2878	1.36 (0.70, 2.65) 0.3603
Q1(2.20–6.51)	1.27 (0.89, 1.81) 0.1931	1.24 (0.86, 1.77) 0.2461	2.63 (1.15, 6.04) 0.0221
P for trend	1.12 (1.00, 1.26) 0.0505	1.12 (1.00, 1.26) 0.0491	1.40 (1.06, 1.84) 0.0180
180-day mortality HRR	0.93 (0.88, 0.99) 0.0144	0.93 (0.88, 0.98) 0.0116	0.80 (0.68, 0.94) 0.0066
HRR(quartile)
Q4(9.85–15.83)	1.0	1.0	1.0
Q3(8.36–9.84)	0.83 (0.55, 1.26) 0.3799	0.77 (0.51, 1.16) 0.2122	0.95 (0.53, 1.71) 0.8700
Q2(6.52–8.35)	1.28 (0.89, 1.84) 0.1885	1.24 (0.86, 1.78) 0.2479	1.34 (0.69, 2.59) 0.3871
Q1(2.20–6.51)	1.30 (0.91, 1.85) 0.1455	1.28 (0.90, 1.82) 0.1773	2.64 (1.16, 6.04) 0.0212
P for trend	1.13 (1.01, 1.27) 0.0337	1.13 (1.01, 1.27) 0.0303	1.39 (1.06, 1.84) 0.0181

Notes: Non-adjusted model. Adjusted model I: adjusted for gender and age; Adjusted model II: adjusted for gender, age, hyperlipidemia, myocardial infarct, congestive heart failure, PVD, dementia, severe liver disease, malignancy, metastatic solid tumor, paraplegia, peptic ulcer disease, chronic pulmonary dis, rheumatoid arthritis, INR, PT, PTT, WBC, RBC, platelets, ALT, AST, anion-gap, bicarbonate, bicarbonate, BUN, calcium, chloride, creatinine, glucose, potassium, sodium, potassium, warfarin drugs use, NOAC drugs use, antiplatelet agents drugs use and ICU LOS.

Analysis of the Non-Linear Relationship Between the HRR and 180-Day All-Cause Mortality

In this study, we observed that the relationship between the HRR and all-cause mortality in patients with an ischemic stroke was non-linear (Figure 2) after adjusting for gender, age, hyperlipidemia, myocardial infarctions, congestive heart failure, PVD, dementia, severe liver disease, malignancy, metastatic solid tumors, paraplegia, peptic ulcer disease, chronic pulmonary disease, rheumatoid arthritis, INR, PT, PTT, WBC, RBC, platelets, ALT, AST, anion gap bicarbonate, BUN, calcium, chloride, creatinine, glucose, potassium, sodium, warfarin use, NOAC drug use, antiplatelet agent drug use and ICU LOS. Using a two-segment linear regression model, we calculated that the inflection point was 9.74 (HRR = 9.74) (Table 4). There was no significant correlation to the right of the inflection point (HR (95% CI) 1.06 (0.82–1.38), p = 0.6383); however, there was a negative correlation between the HRR value and all-cause mortality to the left of the threshold inflection point (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61–0.87, p = 0.0005).

Figure 2

The nonlinear relationship between the HRR and 180-day All-Cause Mortality.

Table 4

Analysis of Nonlinear Relationship the HRR and 180-Day All-Cause Mortality

Inflection Point of HRR	Hazard Ratio(HR)	95% CI	P-value
≤9.74	0.73	0.61–0.87	0.0005
>9.74	1.06	0.82–1.38	0.6383

Notes: Adjusted variables: gender,age, hyperlipidemia,myocardial infarct, congestive heart failure, PVD, dementia, severe liver disease, malignancy, metastatic solid tumor, paraplegia, peptic ulcer disease, chronic pulmonary dis, rheumatoid arthritis, INR, PT, PTT, WBC, RBC, platelets, ALT, AST, anion-gap, bicarbonate, bicarbonate, BUN, calcium, chloride, creatinine, glucose, potassium, sodium, potassium, warfarin drugs use, NOAC drugs use, antiplatelet agents drugs use and ICU LOS.

Subgroup Analysis of the Associations Between the HRR Values and All-Cause Mortality

Table 5 displays the results of the subgroup analysis regarding the outcome of all-cause mortality. The tests for the interactions were not statistically significant for gender, age, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarctions, PVD, dementia, severe liver disease, rheumatoid arthritis, malignancy, metastatic solid tumors, peptic ulcer disease, warfarin use and antiplatelet agent drug use (p = 0.4026, 0.6493, 0.1864, 0.2439, 0.5211, 0.5523, 0.2827, 0.6618, 0.3607, 0.5779, 0.2330, 0.4142, 0.4907, 0.7837 and 0.4865, respectively). The tests for interactions were significant for hypertension (p = 0.0184) and NOAC drug use (p = 0.0089). The negative association between the HRR values and all-cause mortality was more obvious in the ischemic stroke patients with AF without hypertension (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.65–0.87, p = 0.0002) than those with hypertension (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.79–1.05, p = 0.1923).The negative association between the HRR values and all-cause mortality was more obvious in the ischemic stroke patients with AF without NOAC drug use (HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.45–0.80, p = 0.0006) than those with NOAC drug use (HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.77–0.99, p = 0.321).

Table 5

Subgroup Analysis of the Associations Between the HRR Values and All-Cause Mortality

Characteristic	Number of Patients	HR(95% CI)	P-value
Gender
Female	561	0.83 (0.69, 0.99)	0.0385
Male	457	0.77 (0.64, 0.93)	0.0055
Age, (year)
<60	75	0.73 (0.48, 1.10)	0.1353
≥60	943	0.80 (0.68, 0.94)	0.0062
Hypertension
No	498	0.75 (0.65, 0.87)	0.0002
Yes	520	0.91 (0.79, 1.05)	0.1923
Hyperlipidemia
No	449	0.87 (0.76, 1.01)	0.0587
Yes	569	0.78 (0.67, 0.91)	0.0018
Diabetes mellitus
No	741	0.81 (0.71, 0.92)	0.0019
Yes	277	0.90 (0.75, 1.08)	0.2557
Congestive heart failure
No	594	0.81 (0.70, 0.94)	0.0057
Yes	424	0.85 (0.74, 0.99)	0.0349
Myocardial infarct
No	828	0.82 (0.72, 0.94)	0.0033
Yes	190	0.87 (0.72, 1.04)	0.1325
PVD
No	869	0.82 (0.72, 0.93)	0.0018
Yes	149	0.93 (0.73, 1.18)	0.5350
Dementia
No	953	0.83 (0.73, 0.94)	0.0034
Yes	65	0.89 (0.64, 1.25)	0.5154
Severe liver disease
No	1009	0.82 (0.73, 0.93)	0.0021
Yes	9	1.55 (0.43, 5.68)	0.5047
Rheumatoid arthritis
No	989	0.83 (0.74, 0.94)	0.0038
Yes	29	0.73 (0.45, 1.17)	0.1903
Malignancy
No	935	0.85 (0.74, 0.96)	0.0111
Yes	83	0.74 (0.58, 0.94)	0.0119
Metastatic solid tumor
No	984	0.84 (0.74, 0.95)	0.0076
Yes	34	0.73 (0.52, 1.04)	0.0789
Paraplegia
No	474	0.96 (0.78, 1.17)	0.6731
Yes	544	0.72 (0.61, 0.84)	<0.0001
Peptic ulcer disease
No	977	0.83 (0.73, 0.93)	0.0024
Yes	21	1.15 (0.49, 2.71)	0.7537
Warfarin drugs use
No	643	0.83 (0.73, 0.94)	0.0028
Yes	375	0.85 (0.68, 1.07)	0.1698
NOAC drugs use
No	750	0.87 (0.77, 0.99)	0.0321
Yes	268	0.60 (0.45, 0.80)	0.0006
Antiplatelet agents drugs use
No	261	0.86 (0.73, 1.00)	0.0568
Yes	757	0.81 (0.71, 0.93)	0.0026

Abbreviations: PVD, peripheral vascular disease; NOAC, novel oral anticoagulant.

Discussion

In this study, we clearly revealed the potential non-linear trend between the HRR and all-cause mortality in ischemic stroke patients with AF. This large retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients with an ischemic stroke has demonstrated that patients with a reduced HRR are more likely to have a higher risk of all-cause mortality even after adjusting for traditional cerebrovascular risk factors.

Strokes remain the second most common cause of death and the main cause of disability in the world.14 An ischemic stroke is the most common type of stroke, accounting for 87% of all stroke types.15 AF is the main cause of a cardiogenic acute ischemic stroke. According to the latest research, the overall mortality rate of ischemic strokes in many countries is on a downward trend.16,17 However, ischemic strokes are still an important cause of death in patients with cerebrovascular diseases and may lead to permanent disability and a significant economic and social burden.18 The decrease in mortality from an ischemic stroke may be partly attributable to improved hospital management.19 Although the overall ischemic stroke hospitalization rate in the United States has decreased, there is an increased hospitalization rate for age-specific ischemic stroke in patients aged 25–64 years.20 Therefore, many clinicians are eager to study the prognosis of ischemic stroke patients.

AF is a known risk factor for ischemic strokes.4,21,22 There are approximately > 2.7 million American AF patients and AF is responsible for 10–12% of all ischemic strokes in the United States each year.23 Among all 19,515 participants of the China‐AF study, 17,898 patients had follow‐up data and 12,045 patients had complete data, After a mean follow‐up of 2.5 years, 1715 cases of the primary endpoint were documented, were each associated with increased risk of all‐cause mortality and nonfatal ischemic stroke.24 The annual risk of an ischemic stroke among individuals with AF can be as high as 18.2% depending on the coexistence of various risk factors.25 Previous reports have demonstrated that in patients with AF, it is meaningful to predict the risk of AF through hemoglobin data.26,27 Lim et al28 reported a nationwide population-based study and found that anemia is a risk factor for incident AF. Both low and high hemoglobin levels are associated with an increased AF risk. Maintaining hemoglobin levels within normal ranges would lower the risk of AF development. Hemoglobin has an oxygen-carrying capacity and can affect the energy balance in the penumbra.29 Patients with low hemoglobin have a reduced ability to carry oxygen in the blood and there is increased blood viscosity in patients with high hemoglobin. Low or high hemoglobin levels increase the risk of ischemic strokes. Sacco et al30 found that there is a U-shaped association between hemoglobin and a poor prognosis of ischemic strokes. Red cell distribution width (RDW) is a measure of the variability of the size of red blood cells. It is calculated automatically or manually by dividing the standard deviation of red blood cell volume and the volume of red blood cell expressed as a percentage. Elevated RDW is a result of increased destruction of red blood cells, eg in the course of haemolysis or red blood cell production dysfunction related to a deficiency of iron, vitamin B12, folic acid or ongoing inflammation.31 Recently, quite a number of publications also demonstrated the utility of the RDW as a prognostic factor for various diseases of the cardiovascular system such as coronary heart disease, peripheral artery disease, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure and stroke.32 Mohindra et al33 showed that a proposed RDW index could potentially be an important parameter in predicting the prognosis of ischemic stroke patients. In the past two years, HRR has been widely reported as an important observation indicator of cancer prognosis.Both hemoglobin and RDW are important components of HRR, and the relationship between lower hemoglobin, higher RDW, and frailty in elderly CHD patients has been confirmed, lower HRR is associated with increased frailty risk and has a certain predictive value in elderly hospitalized patients with CHD,11 our study is consistent with previous finding. In this study, we expounded on that finding. The relationship between all-cause mortality in ischemic stroke patients with AF and the HRR values was non-linear,The low level HRR values increase the risk of death in ischemic stroke patients with AF.

Our work has a number of strengths. First, our study was the first undertaken to research the mortality risk factors of ischemic stroke patients with AF. This study focused on the compound variables of the HRR and was the first to investigate the relationship between the HRR and mortality in ischemic stroke patients with AF. Second, the study used real-world data for a large and diverse population study design. Third, we used a two-part Cox proportional risk regression model to perform a threshold effect analysis on the relationship between the HRR and all-cause mortality and performed a subgroup analysis of the association between the HRR and all-cause mortality. Fourth, we analyzed the exposure variable HRR as not only a continuous variable but also a categorical variable and calculated the hazard ratio using binary logistic regression models. Such a method can minimize the incidence of a contingency in the statistical analysis and enhance the reliability of the final results. Our study also had a few limitations. First, this was a single-center retrospective observational study so it was difficult to avoid selection bias. Second, although we adjusted for certain factors, our results may have been influenced by other unknown factors. Third, no long-term follow-up events were provided from the MIMIC-IV database.

Conclusions

The relationship between all-cause mortality and the HRR values was non-linear in ischemic stroke patients with AF. All-cause mortality and the HRR values were negatively correlated when the HRR value was ≤ 9.74.