| Literature DB >> 35218599 |
Gavin Campbell1, Margie D Dixon2, Minisha Lohani3, John Cook4, Rachel Hianik5, Mary Catherine Thomson6, Eli Abernethy7, Colleen Lewis8, Jeffrey Switchenko9, R Donald Harvey10, Rebecca D Pentz11.
Abstract
In phase I trials, some biospecimens are used both for research and patient care and some for research only. Some research participants have therapeutic misconception, assuming all biospecimens are for patient care. This study's aim was to test if a simple information chart would improve understanding of nontherapeutic research procedures. A two-arm study was conducted. Participants in the control group (C) were asked whether biospecimens were for their care, for research only, or for both. The experimental group (E) was asked the same questions but provided with a study-specific information chart labeling the purpose of each biospecimen. One hundred one patients were interviewed. In both arms, understanding that pretreatment blood draws were for patient care and research was moderate (49% for C and 62% for E). Understanding that posttreatment blood draws were for research only was significantly higher in the experimental arm (16% for C and 44% for E; p = 0.002). Providing a simple information chart may help alleviate this aspect of therapeutic misconception.Entities:
Keywords: biospecimens; informed consent; nontherapeutic procedures; phase I research; research ethics; therapeutic misconception
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35218599 PMCID: PMC9069479 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ethics Hum Res ISSN: 2578-2355