Xuebing Wang1, Zineng Xu2, Yanhang Tong1, Long Xia3, Bimeng Jie1, Peng Ding2, Hailong Bai2, Yi Zhang1, Yang He4. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryNational Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology; Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital StomatologyNational Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, No 22 Zhongguancun South Road, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China. 2. Deepcare, Inc, Beijing, China. 3. Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryNational Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology; Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital StomatologyNational Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, No 22 Zhongguancun South Road, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China. fridaydust1983@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the detection and classification of mandibular fracture on spiral computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2013 and July 2020, 686 patients with mandibular fractures who underwent CT scan were classified and annotated by three experienced maxillofacial surgeons serving as the ground truth. An algorithm including two convolutional neural networks (U-Net and ResNet) was trained, validated, and tested using 222, 56, and 408 CT scans, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the algorithm was compared with the ground truth and evaluated by DICE, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). RESULTS: One thousand five hundred six mandibular fractures in nine subregions of 686 patients were diagnosed. The DICE of mandible segmentation using U-Net was 0.943. The accuracies of nine subregions were all above 90%, with a mean AUC of 0.956. CONCLUSIONS: CNNs showed comparable reliability and accuracy in detecting and classifying mandibular fractures on CT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The algorithm for automatic detection and classification of mandibular fractures will help improve diagnostic efficiency and provide expertise to areas with lower medical levels.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the detection and classification of mandibular fracture on spiral computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2013 and July 2020, 686 patients with mandibular fractures who underwent CT scan were classified and annotated by three experienced maxillofacial surgeons serving as the ground truth. An algorithm including two convolutional neural networks (U-Net and ResNet) was trained, validated, and tested using 222, 56, and 408 CT scans, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the algorithm was compared with the ground truth and evaluated by DICE, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). RESULTS: One thousand five hundred six mandibular fractures in nine subregions of 686 patients were diagnosed. The DICE of mandible segmentation using U-Net was 0.943. The accuracies of nine subregions were all above 90%, with a mean AUC of 0.956. CONCLUSIONS: CNNs showed comparable reliability and accuracy in detecting and classifying mandibular fractures on CT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The algorithm for automatic detection and classification of mandibular fractures will help improve diagnostic efficiency and provide expertise to areas with lower medical levels.
Authors: Matthew Adams; Weijia Chen; David Holcdorf; Mark W McCusker; Piers Dl Howe; Frank Gaillard Journal: J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 1.735
Authors: Geert Litjens; Thijs Kooi; Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Francesco Ciompi; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Bram van Ginneken; Clara I Sánchez Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Jakub Olczak; Niklas Fahlberg; Atsuto Maki; Ali Sharif Razavian; Anthony Jilert; André Stark; Olof Sköldenberg; Max Gordon Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 3.717
Authors: Robert Lindsey; Aaron Daluiski; Sumit Chopra; Alexander Lachapelle; Michael Mozer; Serge Sicular; Douglas Hanel; Michael Gardner; Anurag Gupta; Robert Hotchkiss; Hollis Potter Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 11.205