| Literature DB >> 35217802 |
Claire Saule1, Solveig Menu-Hespel2, Matthieu Carton3, Caroline Malhaire4,5, Pascal Cherel6, Fabien Reyal7,8, Marine Le Mentec9, Eugénie Guillot10, Anne Donnadieu11, Nasrine Callet9,11, Sophie Frank9,12, Florence Coussy12, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet9,13,14, Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme9.
Abstract
Women with pathogenic germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants have a higher risk of breast cancer than in the general population. International guidelines recommend specific clinical and radiological breast follow-up. This specific breast screening program has already been shown to be of clinical benefit, but no information is available concerning the use of prognostic factors or specific survival to guide follow-up decisions. We evaluated "high-risk" screening in a retrospective single-center study of 520 women carrying pathogenic germline variants of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene treated for breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2016. We compared two groups of women: the incidental breast cancer group (IBCG) were followed before breast cancer diagnosis (N = 103), whereas the prevalent breast cancer group (PBCG) (N = 417) had no specific follow-up for high risk before breast cancer diagnosis. Breast cancers were diagnosed at an earlier stage in the IBCG than in the PBCG: T0 in 64% versus 19% of tumors, (p < 0.00001), and N0 in 90% vs. 75% (p < 0.00001), respectively. Treatment differed significantly between the 2 groups: less neoadjuvant chemotherapy (7.1% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.00001), adjuvant chemotherapy (47.7% vs. 61.9%, p = 0.004) and more mastectomies (60% vs. 42% p < 0.0001) in the IBCG vs PBCG groups respectively. Overall and breast cancer-specific mortality were similar between the two groups. However, the patients in the IBCG had a significantly longer metastasis-free survival than those in the PBCG, at three years (96.9% [95% CI 93.5-100] vs. 92.30% [95% CI 89.8-94.9]; p = 0.02), suggesting a possible long-term survival advantage.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35217802 PMCID: PMC9436925 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01049-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Hum Genet ISSN: 1018-4813 Impact factor: 5.351