| Literature DB >> 35215953 |
Olga Kurskaya1, Elena Prokopyeva1,2, Hongtao Bi3, Ivan Sobolev1, Tatyana Murashkina1, Alexander Shestopalov1, Lixin Wei4, Kirill Sharshov1.
Abstract
To discover sources for novel anti-influenza drugs, we evaluated the antiviral potential of nine extracts from eight medicinal plants and one mushroom (Avena sativa L., Hordeum vulgare Linn. var. nudum Hook. f., Hippophae rhamnoides Linn., Lycium ruthenicum Murr., Nitraria tangutorum Bobr., Nitraria tangutorum Bobr. by-products, Potentilla anserina L., Cladina rangiferina (L.) Nyl., and Armillaria luteo-virens) from the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau against the influenza A/H3N2 virus. Concentrations lower than 125 μg/mL of all extracts demonstrated no significant toxicity in MDCK cells. During screening, seven extracts (A. sativa, H. vulgare, H. rhamnoides, L. ruthenicum, N. tangutorum, C. rangiferina, and A. luteo-virens) exhibited antiviral activity, especially the water-soluble polysaccharide from the fruit body of the mushroom A. luteo-virens. These extracts significantly reduced the infectivity of the human influenza A/H3N2 virus in vitro when used at concentrations of 15.6-125 μg/mL. Two extracts (N. tangutorum by-products and P. anserina) had no A/H3N2 virus inhibitory activity. Notably, the extract obtained from the fruits of N. tangutorum and N. tangutorum by-products exhibited different anti-influenza effects. The results suggest that extracts of A. sativa, H. vulgare, H. rhamnoides, L. ruthenicum, N. tangutorum, C. rangiferina, and A. luteo-virens contain substances with antiviral activity, and may be promising sources of new antiviral drugs.Entities:
Keywords: A. luteo-virens; A. sativa; C. rangiferina; H. rhamnoides; H. vulgare; H3N2; L. ruthenicum; N. tangutorum; antiviral drugs; extract
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35215953 PMCID: PMC8878895 DOI: 10.3390/v14020360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Origin of extracts and their names.
| No. | Origin | Extract Name |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bran of | ASWP |
| 2 | Bran of | HVWP |
| 3 | Fruit of plant | HRWP |
| 4 | Fruit of plant | LRWP |
| 5 | Fruit of plant | NTWP |
| 6 | Anthocyanins from plant | NJBAE |
| 7 | Root of plant | PAWP |
| 8 | Dendritic part of lichen | CRWP-S |
| 9 | Fruit body of mushroom | ALWP |
The total carbohydrate, uronic acid, protein and peptide, anthocyanin, and endotoxin contents of the studied extracts.
| No. | Extract Name | Total Sugar Content (%) | Uronic Acid Content (%) | Total Protein and Peptide Content (%) | Total Anthocyanin Content (mg CGE per g) | Total Endotoxin Content (EU)/mL | CC50 | IC50 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ASWP | 97.42 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | <0.5 | 395.46 | 19.53 ± 0.41 |
| 2 | HVWP | 93.20 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | <0.5 | 354.56 | 23.73 ± 0.62 |
| 3 | HRWP | 94.73 | 61.93 | 1.32 | 0.24 | <0.5 | 186.36 | 36.46 ± 1.12 |
| 4 | LRWP | 95.37 | 3.32 | 0.01 | 5.53 | <0.5 | 409.11 | 17.58 ± 0.38 |
| 5 | NTWP | 97.25 | 2.78 | 2.10 | 6.12 | <0.5 | 372.74 | 23.80 ± 0.38 |
| 6 | NJBAE | 5.52 | n.d. | n.d. | 723.60 | <0.5 | 286.37 | n.d. |
| 7 | PAWP | 69.35 | 9.51 | 0.07 | 6.79 | <0.5 | 386.38 | n.d. |
| 8 | ALWP | 51.43 | 0.08 | 10.22 | 7.33 | <0.5 | 440.90 | 7.81 ± 0.12 |
| 9 | CRWP-S | 92.16 | 0.01 | 2.92 | n.d. | <0.5 | 277.28 | 31.25 ± 2.51 |
Note: CGE, cyanidin-3-glucoside equivalents; EU, endotoxin units; CC50, the cytotoxic concentration of the extracts that causes death to 50% of viable cells; IC50, inhibitory concentration of extract at which 50% of A/H3N2 virus was neutralized; n.d., not defined.
Figure 1Viability of MDCK cells (%) treated with different concentrations of extracts. Note: CC50 represents the concentration of medicinal plant, lichen, or mushroom extract required to reduce the number of viable cells by 50% relative to the control wells without test compound, calculated from dose–response data; extract concentrations are expressed in μg/mL.
Figure 2(A) Determination of inhibitory concentration values of extracts at which 50% of 100 TCID50 of the A/H3N2 virus was neutralized. Note: Data on extracts NJBAE and PAWP are not shown in the graphs; extract concentrations are expressed in μg/mL. (B) Survival rates of MDCK cells: were left untreated (negative control), treated with oseltamivir, treated with oseltamivir and A/H3N2 virus, or treated with the A/H3N2 virus (positive control).