| Literature DB >> 35215493 |
Yuxiang Yang1, Wei Piao1, Kun Huang1, Hongyun Fang1, Lahong Ju1, Liyun Zhao1, Dongmei Yu1, Yanan Ma2.
Abstract
Our current study aimed to estimate the relationship between dietary patterns and hyperuricemia among the Chinese elderly over 60 years old. All the data were obtained from China Nutrition and Health Surveillance during 2015-2017. A total of 18,691 participants who completed the whole survey were included in our statistical analysis. The definition of hyperuricemia was 420 μmmol/L (7 mg/dL) for male and 360 μmmol/L (6 mg/dL) for female. Exploratory factor analysis was applied to explore posterior dietary patterns in our samples, and five dietary patterns were recognized, namely "Typical Chinese", "Modern Chinese", "Western", "Animal products and alcohol", and "Tuber and fermented vegetables". After multiple adjusted logistic regression, participants in the highest quartile of "typical Chinese" (Q4 vs. Q1, OR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.28-0.37, p-trend < 0.0001), "modern Chinese" (Q4 vs. Q1, OR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.71-0.93, p-trend = 0.0021) and "tuber and fermented vegetables" (Q4 vs. Q1, OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69-0.88, p-trend < 0.0001) showed a lower risk of hyperuricemia, while animal products and alcohol was positively associated with hyperuricemia (Q4 vs. Q1, OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.31-1.7, p-trend < 0.0001). We also found that participants who mainly ate a modern Chinese diet tended to meet the RNI/AI of nutrients we discuss in this paper, which may supply some information for hyperuricemia prevention and management by dietary methods.Entities:
Keywords: dietary pattern; elderly; factor analysis; hyperuricemia; surveillance
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35215493 PMCID: PMC8875556 DOI: 10.3390/nu14040844
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
General characteristics of elderly participants in CNHS 2015–2017 by gender group.
| Male | Female | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | 9332 (49.93) | 9359 (50.07) | 18,691 |
| Age (years) * | 66.89 (63.19, 72.10) | 66.11 (62.77, 71.18) | 66.51 (62.97, 71.69) |
| BMI (kg/m2) * | 23.68 (21.36, 26.11) | 24.25 (21.91, 26.81) | 23.96 (21.62, 26.46) |
| Urban or rural * | |||
| Urban | 4148 (44.45) | 4365 (46.64) | 8513 (45.55) |
| Rural | 5184 (55.55) | 4994 (53.36) | 10,178 (54.45) |
| Education* | |||
| Primary school or below | 5462 (58.53) | 7171 (76.62) | 12,633 (67.59) |
| Middle school | 2436 (26.1) | 1417 (15.14) | 3853 (20.61) |
| High school or higher | 1434 (15.37) | 771 (8.24) | 2205 (11.8) |
| Income (CNY) | |||
| Low | 3819 (40.92) | 3710 (39.64) | 7529 (40.28) |
| Medium | 3384 (36.26) | 3465 (37.02) | 6849 (36.64) |
| High | 2129 (22.81) | 2184 (23.34) | 4313 (23.08) |
| Marital status * | |||
| Living with spouse | 8712 (93.36) | 8004 (85.52) | 16,716 (89.43) |
| Other status | 620 (6.64) | 1355 (14.48) | 1975 (10.57) |
| Current smoker * | |||
| No | 5071 (54.34) | 8959 (95.73) | 14,030 (75.06) |
| Yes | 4261 (45.66) | 400 (4.27) | 4661 (24.94) |
| Alcohol drinking * | |||
| No | 4684 (50.19) | 8126 (86.83) | 12,810 (68.54) |
| Yes | 4648 (49.81) | 1233 (13.17) | 5881 (31.46) |
| Physical activity * | |||
| Low | 2358 (25.27) | 2092 (22.35) | 4450 (23.81) |
| Moderate | 2502 (26.81) | 2489 (26.59) | 4991 (26.7) |
| High | 4472 (47.92) | 4778 (51.05) | 9250 (49.49) |
| Sedentary behavior (h) * | |||
| 0~<2 | 1066 (11.42) | 1340 (14.32) | 2406 (12.87) |
| 2~3 | 3399 (36.42) | 3483 (37.22) | 6882 (36.82) |
| ≥4 | 4867 (52.15) | 4536 (48.47) | 9403 (50.31) |
| Sleeping time (h) * | |||
| 0~<6 | 912 (9.77) | 1368 (14.62) | 2280 (12.2) |
| 6~9 | 7131 (76.41) | 6904 (73.77) | 14,035 (75.09) |
| ≥10 | 1289 (13.81) | 1087 (11.61) | 2376 (12.71) |
| NCDs * | |||
| Less than one disease | 5629 (60.32) | 5224 (55.82) | 10,853 (58.07) |
| Over two diseases | 3703 (39.68) | 4135 (44.18) | 7838 (41.93) |
| Glu (mmol/L) * | 5.35 (4.92, 5.91) | 5.39 (4.99, 5.98) | 5.37 (4.96, 5.94) |
| Tc (mmol/L) * | 4.69 (4.12, 5.31) | 5.07 (4.47, 5.72) | 4.87 (4.27, 5.53) |
| Tg (mmol/L) * | 1.14 (0.8, 1.67) | 1.37 (0.98, 1.97) | 1.25 (0.88, 1.83) |
| LDL (mmol/L) * | 2.89 (2.37, 3.44) | 3.19 (2.64, 3.78) | 3.03 (2.49, 3.61) |
| HDL (mmol/L) * | 1.24 (1.03, 1.49) | 1.29 (1.09, 1.52) | 1.27 (1.06, 1.51) |
| HbA1c (%) * | 5.1 (4.6, 5.5) | 5.2 (4.7, 5.6) | 5.1 (4.7, 5.5) |
| SBP (mmHg) * | 142 (129.67, 157) | 144.33 (130.67, 160.33) | 143 (130, 158.67) |
| DBP (mmHg) * | 80.67 (73.67, 88) | 78 (71, 85.67) | 79.33 (72, 87) |
| SUA (μmmol/L) * | 333 (281, 392.6) | 275.9 (233, 328.3) | 303.4 (252.3, 364.3) |
Values of polytomous variables may not sum to 100% because of rounding. Abbreviation: BMI— body mass index; Glu—fasting blood glucose; Tc—total cholesterol; Tg—triglyceride; LDL—low density lipoprotein; HDL—high density lipoprotein; HbA1c—glycosylated hemoglobin; SBP—systolic blood pressure; DBP—diastolic blood pressure; UA—serum uric acid. * Indicated p-value < 0.05.
Weighted prevalence of hyperuricemia in Chinese elderly in CNHS 2015–2017.
| Prevalence %, (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Total | 15.73 (14.47, 16.99) | |
| Gender | 0.3294 | |
| Male | 16.19 (14.62, 17.76) | |
| Female | 15.26 (13.69, 16.83) | |
| Age (years) | <0.0001 | |
| 60~79 | 14.96 (13.72, 16.20) | |
| ≥80 | 23.4 (19.40, 27.40) | |
| BMI | <0.0001 | |
| Underweight | 6.81 (4.46, 9.16) | |
| Normal | 11.04 (9.72, 12.36) | |
| Overweight | 19.39 (17.67, 21.11) | |
| Obese | 24.78 (21.61, 27.95) | |
| Education | 0.0033 | |
| Primary school or below | 14.8 (13.37, 16.24) | |
| Middle school | 17.11 (14.87, 19.35) | |
| High school or higher | 18.93 (16.42, 21.43) | |
| Income (CNY) | <0.0001 | |
| Low | 12.12 (10.66, 13.59) | |
| Medium | 16.07 (14.41, 17.72) | |
| High | 21.02 (18.67, 23.37) | |
| Marital status | 0.6513 | |
| Living with spouse | 15.65 (14.38, 16.91) | |
| Other status | 16.29 (13.38, 19.20) | |
| Current smoker | 0.27 | |
| No | 16.02 (14.69, 17.36) | |
| Yes | 14.84 (12.81, 16.87) | |
| Alcohol drinking | 0.0019 | |
| No | 14.79 (13.37, 16.13) | |
| Yes | 17.85 (15.93, 19.78) | |
| Physical activity | 0.0743 | |
| Low | 16.12 (14.09, 18.16) | |
| Moderate | 17.02 (15.04, 19.01) | |
| High | 14.72 (13.35, 16.09) | |
| Sedentary behavior (h) | 0.0004 | |
| <2 | 11.34 (9.32, 13.36) | |
| 2~3 | 15.55 (13.81, 17.29) | |
| ≥4 | 17 (15.25, 18.76) | |
| Sleeping time (h) | 0.3426 | |
| <6 | 15.33 (12.73, 17.93) | |
| 6~9 | 15.42 (14.08, 16.77) | |
| ≥10 | 17.59 (14.19, 20.99) | |
| NCDs | <0.0001 | |
| Less than one disease | 11.24 (10.12, 12.37) | |
| Over two diseases | 21.52 (19.58, 23.45) |
Figure 1Distribution of hyperuricemia among Chinese elderly by weighted prevalence.
Figure 2Factor loading of food items in each dietary pattern.
Figure 3The distribution of dietary patterns among elderly on China mainland.
Association between different dietary patterns and hyperuricemia by logistic regression.
| Dietary Pattern | Group of Quartile | No. of Cases | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||
| Typical Chinese | Q1 | 899 | reference | reference | reference |
| Q2 | 982 | 1.13 (1.02, 1.25) | 1.06 (0.96, 1.18) | 1.00 (0.90, 1.12) | |
| Q3 | 742 | 0.8 (0.72, 0.89) | 0.66 (0.59, 0.74) | 0.60 (0.53, 0.68) | |
| Q4 | 415 | 0.41 (0.37, 0.47) | 0.34 (0.30, 0.38) | 0.32 (0.28, 0.37) | |
| - | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||
| Modern Chinese | Q1 | 706 | reference | reference | reference |
| Q2 | 784 | 1.14 (1.02, 1.28) | 1.13 (1.01, 1.27) | 1.10 (0.98, 1.23) | |
| Q3 | 798 | 1.17 (1.05, 1.31) | 1.13 (1.01, 1.26) | 1.04 (0.92, 1.17) | |
| Q4 | 750 | 1.08 (0.97, 1.21) | 0.96 (0.86, 1.08) | 0.81 (0.71, 0.93) | |
| - | 0.1462 | 0.4453 | 0.0021 | ||
| Western | Q1 | 726 | reference | reference | reference |
| Q2 | 733 | 1.02 (0.91, 1.14) | 1.03 (0.92, 1.16) | 1.05 (0.93, 1.18) | |
| Q3 | 734 | 1.02 (0.92, 1.14) | 0.99 (0.88, 1.10) | 0.97 (0.86, 1.09) | |
| Q4 | 845 | 1.21 (1.09, 1.35) | 1.11 (1.00, 1.24) | 1.04 (0.93, 1.17) | |
| - | 0.0009 | 0.1207 | 0.8218 | ||
| Animal products and alcohol | Q1 | 651 | reference | reference | reference |
| Q2 | 733 | 1.16 (1.04, 1.30) | 1.19 (1.06, 1.33) | 1.18 (1.05, 1.32) | |
| Q3 | 773 | 1.24 (1.10, 1.38) | 1.27 (1.13, 1.42) | 1.25 (1.11, 1.41) | |
| Q4 | 881 | 1.45 (1.30, 1.62) | 1.49 (1.33, 1.68) | 1.49 (1.31, 1.70) | |
| - | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||
| Tuber and fermented vegetables | Q1 | 899 | reference | reference | reference |
| Q2 | 769 | 0.84 (0.75, 0.93) | 0.87 (0.78, 0.97) | 0.91 (0.82, 1.02) | |
| Q3 | 735 | 0.79 (0.71, 0.88) | 0.85 (0.76, 0.95) | 0.89 (0.80, 1.00) | |
| Q4 | 635 | 0.67 (0.60, 0.75) | 0.73 (0.65, 0.82) | 0.78 (0.69, 0.88) | |
| - | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Model 1: unadjusted model; Model 2: adjusted for age, gender, and BMI; Model 3: further adjusted for urban and rural, income, education, marital status, smoke, alcohol-drinking, static status, sleeping time, and total energy intake groups.
Figure 4The proportion of participants with each DP who reached the RNI/AI standard of nutrients.