| Literature DB >> 35214880 |
Julia Rubio1, Guisselle Arias1, Christian Robles-Kelly1, Evelyn Silva-Moreno2, Luis Espinoza3, Héctor Carrasco4, Andrés F Olea4.
Abstract
Plant cell culture is a source of plant material from which bioactive metabolites can be extracted. In this work, the in vitro propagation of Leptocarpha rivularis, an endemic Chilean shrub with anticancer activity, is described. Different media were tested and optimized for the introduction, propagation, and rooting steps of the micropropagation process. At the end of this process, 83% of plants were successfully acclimatized under greenhouse conditions. Callus induction from the internodal stem segment was performed using various combinations of phytohormones. Green-colored, friable, and non-organogenic callus was generated with a callus induction index higher than 90%. The chemical composition of extracts and callus, obtained from clonal plants, was assessed and the results indicate that the phytochemical profiles of extracts from micropropagated plants are like those found for plants collected from natural habitats, leptocarpine (LTC) being the major component. However, no LTC was detected in callus extract. HeLa and CoN cells, treated with LTC or extract of micropropagated plants, exhibit important diminution on cell viability and a drastic decrease in gene expression of IL-6 and mmp2, genes associated with carcinogenic activity. These effects are more important in cancer cells than in normal cells. Thus, micropropagated L. rivularis could be developed as a potential source of efficient antiproliferative agents.Entities:
Keywords: callogenesis; cell viability; gene expression; micropropagation; phytochemistry
Year: 2022 PMID: 35214880 PMCID: PMC8878025 DOI: 10.3390/plants11040546
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Medium composition for in vitro clonal micropropagation platform of Leptocarpha rivularis. Murashige and Skoog medium, MS, with 3% (w/v) of sucrose, ascorbic acid (0.05 g/L), charcoal (1 g/L) and different hormone combinations. Hormones included are: 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) and gibberellic acid (GA3). * Indicates best medium protocol.
| Introduction (I) | Propagation (P) | Rooting (R) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 | I2 | I3 | I4 | I5 * | P1 * | P2 | P3 | R1 | ||
| Hormones (µM) | BAP | 2.20 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 3.50 | 4.40 | 4.40 | 4.40 | 4.40 | 3.50 |
| IBA | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.49 | |||
| NAA | 0.27 | |||||||||
| GA3 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 | |||||
Figure 1In vitro clonal micro propagation platform of Leptocarpha rivularis. (a) Stick with dormant shoot sterilization; (b) in vitro culture establishment; (c) propagation protocol for in vitro explants; (d) complete “adult” plant generated by in vitro culture. Uses for this material will be (e) semipolar extraction or (f) explant acclimation under greenhouse conditions.
Medium composition for Leptocarpha rivularis callus induction. Different combinations of auxins and cytokines were used: 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), isopentenyl adenine (2ip), kinetin (KIN), thidiazuron (TDZ), zeatin (Z). n.c.i.: no callus induction.
| Hormones | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction Media | Ref | Auxins | Conc. (µM) | Cytokines | Conc. (µM) | CIF (%) * (Mean ± S.E.) | Plant Organ | Callus Charact † |
| C0 | 0 | leaf, intermodal section | n.c.i. | |||||
| C1 | NAA | 2.7 | TDZ | 4.5 | 0 | leaf | n.c.i. | |
| C2 | NAA | 2.7 | KIN | 4.6 | 0 | leaf | n.c.i. | |
| C3 | NAA | 2.7 | KIN | 2.3 | 33.3 ± 1.2 | leaf | compact, rooting | |
| C4 | NAA | 5.5 | KIN | 2.3 | 0 | leaf | n.c.i. | |
| C5 | NAA | 5.5 | KIN | 2.3 | 0 | leaf | n.c.i. | |
| C6 | [ | NAA | 5.5 | BAP | 4.4 | 0 | root | n.c.i. |
| C6 | [ | NAA | 5.5 | BAP | 4.4 | 36.1 ± 2.6 | leaf | compact, greenish |
| C7 | NAA | 2.7 | BAP | 4.4 | 94.4 ± 1.5 | internodal section | friable, green | |
| C8 | NAA | 5.5 | BAP | 4.4 | 91.8 ± 1.3 | internodal section | friable, green | |
| C9 | [ | 2,4D | 4.9 | BAP | 4.4 | 0 | leaf | n.c.i. |
| C10 | [ | 2,4D | 9.8 | BAP | 8.8 | 27.8 ± 3.2 | leaf, root | compact, brown |
| C11 | [ | 2,4D | 13.5 | BAP | 8.8 | 0 | leaf | n.c.i. |
| C12 | BAP-KIN | 0 | leaf, intermodal section | n.c.i. | ||||
| C13 | BAP-Z | 2.7 ± 0.6 | leaf | compact, rooting | ||||
| C14 | 2ip | 0 | leaf | n.c.i. | ||||
* CIF (%) = number of explants forming calluses/(total number of explants × 100%). † Callus description following Ikeuchi et al. 2013 [25].
Figure 2Histological analysis of L. rivularis callus induced under in vitro culture conditions. (a) Callus structures; (b) cells at the contact surface 21 days after callus induction, * shows an initial internodal section and following dedifferentiation; (c) arrows indicate meristemoids formation.
Figure 3HPLC chromatograms obtained for: (a) LTC pure compound; (b) extract of L. rivularis plants collected from natural habitat; (c) extract of micropropagated explants of L. rivularis.
Figure 4Biological activity of in vitro plant extracts. Resazurin colorimetric assay of: (a) control cell line, CoN; (b) HeLa cancer cell line. Relative fold change expression: (c) IL-6, (d) mmp2. All data represent the means of three independent replicates ± SD (n = 9). The significance of difference was analyzed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (p < 0.05); asterisks indicate significant differences compared with negative control under the same treatment conditions (**** p < 0.0001).