Literature DB >> 35213701

Increased feed supply and dietary fiber from sugar beet pulp improved energy retention in gestating sows.

Sigrid J Wisbech1, Thomas S Bruun2, Peter K Theil1.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate whether increased inclusion of sugar beet pulp (SBP) alters retention of fat, protein, and energy when backfat (BF) is restored in early- and mid-gestation. In total, 46 sows were fed one of four treatments with increasing inclusion of SBP with dietary fiber (DF) levels of 119, 152, 185, and 217 g/kg; sows were assigned to one of three feeding strategies (FS; high, medium, and low) depending on BF thickness at mating and again at day 30 for the following month. On days 0, 30, 60, and 108, body weight (BW) and BF thickness were measured, and body pools of protein and fat were estimated using the deuterium technique. On days 30 and 60, urine, feces, and blood samples were collected to quantify metabolites, energy, and N balances. On days 15 and 45, heart rates were recorded to estimate the heat production. At farrowing, total born and weight of the litter were recorded. In early gestation, BW gain (P < 0.01) and body protein retention increased (P < 0.05) with increasing fiber inclusion, while body fat retention increased numerically by 59%. Increase in BF was the greatest for sows fed the high FS, intermediate when fed the medium strategy, and negligible for sows fed the lowest FS. N intake, N loss in feces, and N balance increased linearly, whereas N loss in urine tended to decrease with increasing inclusion of fibers in early gestation. Concomitantly, fecal energy output and energy lost as methane increased linearly (P < 0.001), while energy output in urine declined linearly, and total metabolizable energy intake, therefore, increased from 40.5 MJ ME/d in the low-fiber group to 43.5 mega joule (MJ) metabolizable energy (ME)/d in the high-fiber group (P < 0.001). Changing the metabolizable energy toward more ketogenic energy was expected to favor fat retention rather than protein retention. However, due to increased intake of metabolizable energy and increased N efficiency with increasing fiber inclusion, the sows gained more weight and protein with increasing fiber inclusion. In conclusion, increased feed intake improved both fat and protein retention, whereas increased DF concentration increased protein retention.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. 
For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  backfat; body condition; body retention; de novo fat; feed efficiency; nitrogen utilization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35213701      PMCID: PMC9030113          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  20 in total

1.  The ratio of insoluble to soluble fiber components in soybean hulls affects ileal and total-tract nutrient digestibilities and fecal characteristics of dogs.

Authors:  T M Burkhalter; N R Merchen; L L Bauer; S M Murray; A R Patil; J L Brent; G C Fahey
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Effects of dietary fermentable carbohydrates on behavior and heat production in group-housed sows.

Authors:  M M J A Rijnen; M W A Verstegen; M J W Heetkamp; J Haaksma; J W Schrama
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Performance of sows fed high levels of nonstarch polysaccharides during gestation and lactation over three parities.

Authors:  C M C van der Peet-Schwering; B Kemp; G P Binnendijk; L A den Hartog; H A M Spoolder; M W A Verstegen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Comparison of three methods of feeding sows in gestation and the subsequent effects on lactation performance.

Authors:  M G Young; M D Tokach; F X Aherne; R G Main; S S Dritz; R D Goodband; J L Nelssen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effect of dietary protein intake on energy utilization and feed efficiency of lactating sows.

Authors:  Trine Friis Pedersen; Ching Yu Chang; Nathalie L Trottier; Thomas Sønderby Bruun; Peter Kappel Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  An increased feed intake during early pregnancy improves sow body weight recovery and increases litter size in young sows.

Authors:  L L Hoving; N M Soede; C M C van der Peet-Schwering; E A M Graat; H Feitsma; B Kemp
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effect of soluble and insoluble fiber on energy digestibility, nitrogen retention, and fiber digestibility of diets fed to gestating sows.

Authors:  J A Renteria-Flores; L J Johnston; G C Shurson; D D Gallaher
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  In vivo estimation of body composition of mature gilts using live weight, backfat thickness, and deuterium oxide.

Authors:  D W Rozeboom; J E Pettigrew; R L Moser; S G Cornelius; S M el Kandelgy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 9.  Reproduction of group-housed sows.

Authors:  Olli Peltoniemi; Stefan Björkman; Dominiek Maes
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2016-07-01

Review 10.  The role of dietary fibre in pig production, with a particular emphasis on reproduction.

Authors:  Selene Jarrett; Cheryl J Ashworth
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-08-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Influence of Sugar Beet Pulp Supplementation on Pigs' Health and Production Quality.

Authors:  Sarunas Badaras; Dovile Klupsaite; Modestas Ruzauskas; Romas Gruzauskas; Egle Zokaityte; Vytaute Starkute; Ernestas Mockus; Jolita Klementaviciute; Darius Cernauskas; Agila Dauksiene; Laurynas Vadopalas; Elena Bartkiene
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.231

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.