Literature DB >> 18539846

Effect of soluble and insoluble fiber on energy digestibility, nitrogen retention, and fiber digestibility of diets fed to gestating sows.

J A Renteria-Flores1, L J Johnston, G C Shurson, D D Gallaher.   

Abstract

Twenty-four sows (12 nulliparous, 12 multiparous) were used to determine soluble fiber (SF) and insoluble fiber (ISF) effects on energy digestibility, N balance, and SF and ISF digestibility. Experimental diets included a corn-soybean meal control (C; 1.20% SF, 9.78% ISF), a 34% oat bran diet high in SF (HS; 3.02% SF, 10.11% ISF), a 12% wheat straw diet high in ISF (HIS; 1.11% SF, 17.86% ISF), and a 16% sugar beet pulp diet (HS + HIS; 2.32% SF, 16.08% ISF). Sows were assigned randomly to diets within parity group and individually fed to meet their energy requirements according to the NRC model assuming 10 pigs per litter and 40 kg of gestation gain. Total feces and urine were collected in 5-d periods at wk 5, 10, and 14 of gestation. There were no interactions between dietary treatments and parity group for any of the response criteria evaluated. Dietary energy digestibility was greatest (P < 0.01) for females fed C (87.9%) and HS (89.3%) diets compared with females fed diets high in ISF (HIS, 82.9; HS + HIS, 86.8%). Energy digestibility was not affected by stage of gestation. Dietary N digestibility was similar between C and HS (86.1 and 86.2%) but greater (P < 0.01) than HIS and HS + HIS (82.8 and 82.8%, respectively). Nitrogen digestibility declined (P < 0.05) as gestation progressed for sows fed HS only. Nitrogen retention as a percentage of N intake was not affected by diet (C, 51.8; HS, 44.0; HIS, 42.0; HS + HIS, 48.6). Soluble fiber digestibility was different (P < 0.01) among experimental diets (C, 85.8; HS, 89.5; HIS, 77.7; HS + HIS, 80.3%). Sows fed HS + HIS (61.8%) and HS (58.4%) had greater (P < 0.05) ISF digestibility than sows fed C (53.5%), whereas sows fed HIS (38.3%) had lower (P < 0.01) ISF digestibility than sows fed the other experimental diets. Greater digestibility of dietary energy (87.1 vs. 86.2%; P < 0.05), N (85.7 vs. 83.2%; P < 0.01), and ISF (54.5 vs. 51.2%; P < 0.06) was observed in multiparous vs. nulliparous sows. In conclusion, increased intake of ISF decreased energy digestibility, whereas increasing SF intake improved energy digestibility. Diet had no effect on N retention. Insoluble fiber digestibility improved when SF intake increased, suggesting that knowledge of specific dietary fiber components is necessary to accurately predict effects of dietary fiber on digestibility. Multiparous sows demonstrated a greater ability to digest fibrous diets than nulliparous sows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18539846     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  14 in total

1.  Viscous and fermentable nonstarch polysaccharides affect intestinal nutrient and energy flow and hindgut fermentation in growing pigs.

Authors:  L Chen; L X Gao; Q H Huang; R Q Zhong; L L Zhang; X F Tang; H F Zhang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Poorer lifetime growth performance of gilt progeny compared with sow progeny is largely due to weight differences at birth and reduced growth in the preweaning period, and is not improved by progeny segregation after weaning.

Authors:  J R Craig; C L Collins; K L Bunter; J J Cottrell; F R Dunshea; J R Pluske
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Increased feed supply and dietary fiber from sugar beet pulp improved energy retention in gestating sows.

Authors:  Sigrid J Wisbech; Thomas S Bruun; Peter K Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 4.  Effects of dietary fiber and its components on metabolic health.

Authors:  James M Lattimer; Mark D Haub
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Effects of Palm Kernel Expellers on Productive Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and White Blood Cells of Lactating Sows.

Authors:  J Kim; J Seo; W Kim; H M Yun; S C Kim; Y Jang; K Jang; K Kim; B Kim; S Park; I Park; M K Kim; K S Seo; H B Kim; I H Kim; S Seo; M Song
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Effects of Oat Bran on Nutrient Digestibility, Intestinal Microbiota, and Inflammatory Responses in the Hindgut of Growing Pigs.

Authors:  Beibei He; Yu Bai; Lili Jiang; Wei Wang; Tiantian Li; Ping Liu; Shiyu Tao; Jiangchao Zhao; Dandan Han; Junjun Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Effects of dietary fiber content and different fiber-rich ingredients on endogenous loss of fat and fatty acids in growing pigs.

Authors:  Yifan Chen; Zhenyu Wang; Jian Ding; Dongxu Ming; Wenhui Wang; Zhaoning Jiang; Ling Liu; Fenglai Wang
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-06-13

Review 8.  Physiological function and application of dietary fiber in pig nutrition: A review.

Authors:  Hao Li; Jie Yin; Bie Tan; Jiashun Chen; Haihan Zhang; Zhiqing Li; Xiaokang Ma
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2021-04-17

9.  Dietary supplementation of germinated pigmented rice (Oryza sativa L.) lowers dyslipidemia risk in ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Lara Marie Pangan Lo; Mi Young Kang; Seong Joon Yi; Soo Im Chung
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Digestible energy and metabolizable energy contents of konjac flour residues and ramie in growing pigs.

Authors:  Enkai Li; Jinbiao Zhao; Ling Liu; Shuai Zhang
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2018-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.