| Literature DB >> 35212853 |
Mingming Huang1, Hongqiang Ye1,2, Hu Chen1, Yongsheng Zhou2, Yunsong Liu2, Yong Wang3, Yuchun Sun4.
Abstract
To compare the accuracy of visual and instrumental methods for tooth-color matching based on three attributes in the Munsell color system and to investigate the characteristics of intraoral scanners for tooth-color matching. Shades of the cervical, middle, and incisal third region of 130 maxillary anterior teeth were matched visually by an experienced prosthodontist (EP) using Vita classical A1-D4 (VC) and Vita System 3D-Master (V3D) shade guides, and digitally by a spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade V, VE) and two intraoral scanners (3Shape TRIOS 3, T3; TRIOS 4, T4). VE was used as a reference. The reproducibility of the three test groups was examined by repeating the measurements in triplicate. The overall trueness of the three test groups (from high to low) was T3 > EP > T4 for VC values (p < 0.01), and T3, EP > T4 (p < 0.01) for V3D. The trueness of T3 in incisal regions was lower than cervical and middle regions. When hue or lightness was correct, the mismatched chroma in test groups was smaller than VE (p < 0.01). The repeatability of EP was the poorest (p < 0.01). The color-matching trueness of T3 was higher than EP and T4. The reproducibility of intraoral scanners was better than visual methodology.Entities:
Keywords: Intraoral scanner; Shade guide; Shade matching; Spectrophotometer; Visual
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35212853 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-022-00694-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Odontology ISSN: 1618-1247 Impact factor: 2.885