| Literature DB >> 35209127 |
Salwinder Singh Dhaliwal1, Vivek Sharma1, Arvind Kumar Shukla2, Vibha Verma1, Manmeet Kaur1, Yashbir Singh Shivay3, Shahida Nisar1, Ahmed Gaber4, Marian Brestic5,6, Viliam Barek7, Milan Skalicky6, Peter Ondrisik5, Akbar Hossain8.
Abstract
Globally, many developing countries are facing silent epidemics of nutritional deficiencies in human beings and animals. The lack of diversity in diet, i.e., cereal-based crops deficient in mineral nutrients is an additional threat to nutritional quality. The present review accounts for the significance of biofortification as a process to enhance the productivity of crops and also an agricultural solution to address the issues of nutritional security. In this endeavor, different innovative and specific biofortification approaches have been discussed for nutrient enrichment of field crops including cereals, pulses, oilseeds and fodder crops. The agronomic approach increases the micronutrient density in crops with soil and foliar application of fertilizers including amendments. The biofortification through conventional breeding approach includes the selection of efficient genotypes, practicing crossing of plants with desirable nutritional traits without sacrificing agricultural and economic productivity. However, the transgenic/biotechnological approach involves the synthesis of transgenes for micronutrient re-translocation between tissues to enhance their bioavailability. Soil microorganisms enhance nutrient content in the rhizosphere through diverse mechanisms such as synthesis, mobilization, transformations and siderophore production which accumulate more minerals in plants. Different sources of micronutrients viz. mineral solutions, chelates and nanoparticles play a pivotal role in the process of biofortification as it regulates the absorption rates and mechanisms in plants. Apart from the quality parameters, biofortification also improved the crop yield to alleviate hidden hunger thus proving to be a sustainable and cost-effective approach. Thus, this review article conveys a message for researchers about the adequate potential of biofortification to increase crop productivity and nourish the crop with additional nutrient content to provide food security and nutritional quality to humans and livestock.Entities:
Keywords: agronomic biofortification; gene modification; green technology; mineral dense field crops; nanotechnology; transgenic/biotechnological approach
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35209127 PMCID: PMC8877941 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27041340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Effects of micronutrient malnutrition on human health.
Figure 2Different approaches to achieve biofortification.
Figure 3Different modes of mineral fertilization.
Soil application of micronutrients for mineral fertilization.
| Micronutrient | Crop | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Zn | Wheat | [ |
| Zn | Rice, Wheat | [ |
| Zn | Cowpea | [ |
| Zn | Lentil | [ |
| Zn + Se | Soybean | [ |
Foliar application of micronutrients for mineral fertilization.
| Micronutrient | Crop | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Zn and Fe | Wheat | [ |
| Zn and Fe | Rice and brown rice | [ |
| Mn and Cu | Wheat | [ |
| Fe | Rice | [ |
| Fe and Zn | Maize | [ |
| Zn | Wheat and Rice | [ |
| Zn + Mn | Wheat, rice, barley | [ |
| Cu | Oats | [ |
| Fe | Teosinte | [ |
| Zn | Oats | [ |
| Zn | Cowpea | [ |
Seed treatment with micronutrients for mineral fertilization.
| Seed treatment | Micronutrient | Crop | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seed Priming | B | Wheat and Rice | [ |
| Zn + | Bread-wheat | [ | |
| Fe and Zn | Wheat and Barley | [ | |
| Seed Coating | Zn | Wheat | [ |
| B | Rice | [ | |
| Mn | Bread wheat | [ |
Figure 4Different amendments under agronomic management practices to enhance mineral content in plant.
Figure 5Conventional breeding approach to achieve biofortification.
Micronutrients sources for mineral enrichment.
| Source | Crop | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| ZnSO4 | Rice, Wheat, Maize | [ |
| Zn-DTPA, Zn-HEDTA, | Maize | [ |
| N + Zn + Fe | Wheat | [ |
| Zn, Mn, Fe, Cu and B | Wheat | [ |
| Zn, I, Se and Fe | Wheat | [ |
| Na2SeO4 + ZnSO4 | Wheat | [ |
| FeSO4·7H2O + ZnSO4·7H2O | Wheat | [ |
| Cu + Zn + Mn + NPK | Winter-wheat | |
| ZnSO4 + Zn-HEDP | Wheat | [ |
| EDDHA-Fe(III), EDTANa2Fe(II) | Rice | [ |
Micronutrient nano-fertilizers for biofortification.
| Micro-Nutrient | Crop | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| ZnO NPs | Wheat | [ |
| Fe3O4 | Wheat | [ |
| Graphene oxide-Zn NPs | Wheat | [ |
| Graphene oxide-Cu NPs | Wheat | |
| Zn5(OH)8(NO3)2·2H2O | Maize | [ |
Biofortification through green technology.
| Microorganisms | Micronutrient Affected | Crop | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fe and Zn | Wheat | [ | |
| Fe and Zn | Wheat | [ | |
|
| Zn | [ | |
| PGPB and AM fungi | Zn and Fe | Wheat | [ |
| Endophytes | Fe and Zn | Wheat | [ |
Interaction between micronutrients and trace elements.
| Micronutrient | Micronutrient and Trace Element | Type of Interaction | Crop | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | Mn | Antagonistic | [ | |
| Fe | Se | Synergistic | Wheat and rice | [ |
Interaction between micronutrients and heavy metals.
| Micro-Nutrient Involved in Interaction | Heavy-Metal Stress | Mode of Application | Crops | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zn | Cd | Soil + foliar | Wheat | [ |
| Zn | Cd | Seed treatment | Wheat | [ |
| Zn + Biochar | Cd | Wheat | ||
| Se and Si | Cd and Pb | Foliar | Brown rice | [ |
| Zerovalent iron + Biochar | Cd | Rice | [ | |
| Zn | Cd | Foliar | Wheat | [ |
| Se + Zn | Cd | Foliar | Wheat | [ |
Crop yield responses to soil mineral application.
| Micronutrient | Rate | Crop | Increase in Yield (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zn | 62.5 kg ha−1 | Wheat | 28.6 | [ |
| Zn | 50.0 kg ha−1 | Wheat | 50.0 | [ |
| Zn | 50.0 kg ha−1 | Rice | 14.8 | |
| Zn | 5.0 kg ha−1 | Lentils | 40.0 | [ |
| Zn | 12 mg kg−1 | Wheat (Zincol-2016) | 22.6 | [ |
| Zn | 10 mg kg−1 | Mung-bean | 44.7 | [ |
| Zn | 25 kg ha−1 | Oats | 28.9 | [ |
Crop yield responses to foliar mineral application.
| Micronutrient Applied | Crop | Increase in Yield (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fe | Maize | 6.4 | [ |
| Zn | Maize | 6.2 | |
| Fe | Teosinte | 32.5 | [ |
| Urea | Chickpea | 12.4 | |
| Urea | Chickpea | 10.5 | |
| Cu | Oats | 28.9 | [ |
| Zn | Oats | 24.6 | [ |
| Zn + Fe | Wheat | 24.8 | [ |