| Literature DB >> 35208980 |
Xian Lin1,2, Bozhe Li1, Jing Wen1, Jijun Wu1, Daobang Tang1, Yuanshan Yu1, Yujuan Xu1, Baojun Xu2.
Abstract
In order to address the poor stability of the betacyanins from red pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus, HP), which are considered as good sources of natural colorant, liposomal-encapsulation technique was applied in this study. Thin-layer dispersion method was employed to prepare HP betacyacnin liposomes (HPBL). The formulation parameters for HPBL were optimized, and the characteristics, stability, and release profile of HPBL in in vitro gastrointestinal systems were evaluated.Results showed that an HP betacyanin encapsulation efficiency of 93.43 ± 0.11% was obtained after formulation optimization. The HPBL exhibited a narrow size distribution of particle within a nanometer range and a strong electronegative ζ-potential. By liposomal encapsulation, storage stability of HP betacyanin was significantly enhanced in different storage temperatures. When the environmental pH ranged from 4.3-7.0, around 80% of HP betacyanins were preserved on Day 21 with the liposomal protection. The loss of 2,2'-Diphenyl-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activity and color deterioration of HPBL were developed in accordance with the degradation of HP betacyanins during storage. In in vitro gastrointestinal digestion study, with the protection of liposome, the retention rates of HP betacyanins in vitro were enhanced by 14% and 40% for gastric and intestinal digestion, respectively.This study suggested that liposomal encapsulation was an effective approach to stabilize HP betacyanins during storage and gastrointestinal digestion, but further investigations were needed to better optimize the liposomal formulation and understand the complex liposomal system.Entities:
Keywords: betacyanin; bioaccessibility; liposome; red pitaya; storage stability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35208980 PMCID: PMC8880447 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27041193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Central Composite Design Matrix and The Response Values for The EE of Betacyanin in HPBL.
| No. | A: HP Extract | B: Lecithin-to-Cholesterol Ratio | C: Lecithin Concentration (g/mL) | EE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | Code X1 * | X2 | Code X2 * | X3 | Code X3 * | ||
| 1 | 0.125 | 0 | 0.000 | −α | 0.018 | 0 | 90.34% |
| 2 | 0.125 | 0 | 5.000 | 0 | 0.018 | 0 | 88.19% |
| 3 | 0.125 | 0 | 5.000 | 0 | 0.006 | −α | 93.28% |
| 4 | 0.200 | α | 5.000 | 0 | 0.018 | 0 | 61.72% |
| 5 | 0.080 | −1 | 7.973 | 1 | 0.025 | 1 | 85.80% |
| 6 | 0.170 | 1 | 2.027 | −1 | 0.011 | −1 | 80.41% |
| 7 | 0.125 | 0 | 5.000 | 0 | 0.018 | 0 | 89.19% |
| 8 | 0.080 | −1 | 2.027 | −1 | 0.011 | −1 | 93.75% |
| 9 | 0.170 | 1 | 7.973 | 1 | 0.025 | 1 | 74.48% |
| 10 | 0.050 | −α | 5.000 | 0 | 0.018 | 0 | 75.84% |
| 11 | 0.170 | 1 | 7.973 | 1 | 0.011 | −1 | 84.65% |
| 12 | 0.125 | 0 | 10.000 | α | 0.018 | 0 | 90.24% |
| 13 | 0.125 | 0 | 5.000 | 0 | 0.030 | α | 87.42% |
| 14 | 0.125 | 30 | 5.000 | 0 | 0.018 | 0 | 89.66% |
| 15 | 0.081 | −1 | 2.027 | −1 | 0.025 | 1 | 92.05% |
| 16 | 0.080 | −1 | 7.973 | 1 | 0.011 | −1 | 88.93% |
| 17 | 0.170 | 1 | 2.027 | −1 | 0.025 | 1 | 83.67% |
* The code numbers of 0, −1, 1, −α, and α represented the center point, factorial point, factorial point, axial point, and axial point in the central composite design, respectively.
Analysis of Variance of Regression Model.
| Variables | Sum of | df | Mean | F-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 1015.64 | 9 | 112.85 | 15.98 | 0.0007 |
| A-HP extract concentration | 264.15 | 1 | 264.15 | 37.41 | 0.0005 |
| B-Lecithin-to-cholesterol ratio | 16.67 | 1 | 16.67 | 2.36 | 0.1683 |
| C-Lecithin concentration | 31.06 | 1 | 31.06 | 4.4 | 0.0742 |
| AB | 3.28 | 1 | 3.28 | 0.464 | 0.5176 |
| AC | 1.19 | 1 | 1.19 | 0.1688 | 0.6935 |
| BC | 31.42 | 1 | 31.42 | 4.45 | 0.0729 |
| A2 | 489.34 | 1 | 489.34 | 69.3 | <0.0001 |
| B2 | 11.91 | 1 | 11.91 | 1.69 | 0.2353 |
| C2 | 12.15 | 1 | 12.15 | 1.72 | 0.231 |
| Lack of fit | 48.3 | 5 | 9.66 | 17.11 | 0.0561 |
| Residual | 49.43 | 7 | 7.06 | ||
| Pure error | 1.13 | 2 | 0.5646 | ||
| Correlation total | 1065.07 | 16 |
Figure 1Response surface plots showing the effects of HP extract concentration, lecithin-to-cholesterol ratio, and lecithin concentration on the EE of HPBL: (a) interactive relationships between HP extract concentration and lecithin-to-cholesterol ratio; (b) interactive relationships between HPextract concentration and lecithin concentration; (c) interactive relationships betweenlecithin-to-cholesterol ratio and lecithin concentration.
Figure 2Physicochemical characteristics of HPBL: (a) Absorbance of encapsulated HP betacyanin solution and unencapsulated HP betacyanin (FHPB) solution with a wavelength of 538 nm as separated by Sephadex G-50; (b) size(z-average), ζ-potential, and polydispersity of HPBL;(c) transmission electron microscopy observation of HPBL; (d) DPPH free radical scavenging rate.
Figure 3Stability of HPBL under different storage temperatures: (a) Retention rate; (b) DPPH scavenging activity; (c) L* value, which represents the color of lightness; (d) a* value, which represents the color redness when the value is positive; and (e) b* value, which represents the color of yellowness when the value is positive.
Figure 4Stability of HPBL at different pH: (a) Retention rate; (b) DPPH scavenging activity; (c) L* value, which represents the color of lightness; (d) a* value, which represents the color rednesswhen the value is positive; (e) b* value, which represents the color of yellowness when the value is positive.
Figure 5Stability of HPBL during in vitro gastrointestinal digestion: (a) Retention rate of HPBL during in vitro GI digestion; (b) variation of DPPH scavenging activity of HPBL during in vitro GI digestion.