Literature DB >> 3342491

The relationship between left ventricular systolic function and congestive heart failure diagnosed by clinical criteria.

P R Marantz1, J N Tobin, S Wassertheil-Smoller, R M Steingart, J P Wexler, N Budner, L Lense, J Wachspress.   

Abstract

There is no uniformly accepted clinical definition for congestive heart failure (CHF), although criteria have been published by various groups. There is also no reference standard for CHF, although left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) gives a quantitative assessment of systolic function and is useful in predicting prognosis. To determine the relationship between LVEF and clinically diagnosed CHF, we compared resting LVEF determined by radionuclide ventriculography with diagnosis of CHF by clinical criteria in 407 patients, based on clinical data collected by a cardiology fellow. Of 153 patients with a low LVEF (less than or equal to 0.40), 30 (20%) met none of the criteria for CHF. Conversely, of 204 patients with normal LVEF (greater than or equal to 0.50), 105 (51%) met at least one of the criteria. We conclude that different criteria for CHF will have varying utility depending on the population being examined, and that a combination of clinical features and an objective measure of cardiac performance is needed to diagnose CHF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3342491     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.77.3.607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  38 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of heart failure in primary care: an assessment of international guidelines.

Authors:  G M Grimshaw; K Khunti; R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Are angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers making an impact on the epidemiology of heart failure?

Authors:  Kirkwood F Adams
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Therapeutic implications of diastolic dysfunction in heart failure.

Authors:  J W Dean; P A Poole-Wilson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Clinical burden and health service challenges of chronic heart failure.

Authors:  F D Richard Hobbs
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Preoperative evaluation of the cardiac patient for noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  P G Barash
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Classification of heart failure in population based research: an assessment of six heart failure scores.

Authors:  A Mosterd; J W Deckers; A W Hoes; A Nederpel; A Smeets; D T Linker; D E Grobbee
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Classification of heart failure in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study: a comparison of diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Wayne D Rosamond; Patricia P Chang; Chris Baggett; Anna Johnson; Alain G Bertoni; Eyal Shahar; Anita Deswal; Gerardo Heiss; Lloyd E Chambless
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 8.790

8.  Diagnosis of heart failure.

Authors:  J Cleland
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Use of BNP and NT-proBNP for the diagnosis of heart failure in the emergency department: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Stephen A Hill; Ronald A Booth; P Lina Santaguida; Andrew Don-Wauchope; Judy A Brown; Mark Oremus; Usman Ali; Amy Bustamam; Nazmul Sohel; Robert McKelvie; Cynthia Balion; Parminder Raina
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  Echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular diastolic function: implications for treatment.

Authors:  S J Brecker; D G Gibson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.