| Literature DB >> 35208519 |
Katarzyna Białczyk1, Jan Kłopocki2, Jacek Kryś1, Maciej Jaskulski1, Anna Lewandowska3, Robert Szafkowski2, Karol Ogurkowski3, Derek Pheby4, Karl Morten5, Marcin Jaracz2.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Current studies show an important role of affective temperament in sport performance. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the use of the TEMPS-A scale, by using it to examine five dimensions of affective temperament in three groups of athletes. We hypothesized that temperament may be a predisposing factor to the level of commitment and type of training. Materials and methods: The study group (N:71, 33 female) consisted of professional canoeists (N:25, aged 18-30), sports pilots (N:21, aged 19-57) and non-professionals regularly performing aerobic exercises (N:25, aged 23-33). The Affective Temperament of Pisa, Paris and San Diego Autoquestionnaire (TEMPS-A) was used to evaluate affective temperament dimensions. Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric tests.Entities:
Keywords: affective temperament; athletes; sport attitude
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35208519 PMCID: PMC8876331 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58020195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) ISSN: 1010-660X Impact factor: 2.430
Internal correlation between affective temperaments of TEMPS—A in the study group N = 71.
| Depressive | Cyclothymic | Hyperthymic | Irritable | Anxious | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depressive | 1.00 | 0.21 | −0.09 | 0.10 | 0.49 * |
| Cyclothymic | 1.00 | −0.02 | 0.54 * | 0.47 * | |
| Hyperthymic | 1.00 | 0.15 | −0.18 | ||
| Irritable | 1.00 | 0.44 * |
* p < 0.05.
Factor analysis of TEMPS—A dimensions.
| Factor | ||
|---|---|---|
| I | II | |
| Depressive | 0.53 | 0.53 |
| Cyclothymic | 0.81 * | 0.19 |
| Hyperthymic | 0.04 | 0.82 * |
| Irritable | 0.71 * | 0.44 |
| Anxious | 0.86 * | 0.18 |
* Alpha > 0.07.
Figure 1Spatial projection of the principal components of the TEMPS—A subscales.
The results of TEMPS—A in whole group.
| Whole Group | Females | Males | Differences between Males and Females | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depressive | 0.22 ± 0.11 | 0.19 ± 0.10 | 0.25 ± 0.12 | 0.08 |
| Cyclothymic | 0.23 ± 0.17 | 0.24 ± 0.16 | 0.21 ± 0.18 | 0.20 |
| Hyperthymic | 0.63 ± 0.15 | 0.67 ± 0.16 | 0.60 ± 0.15 | 0.04 |
| Irritable | 0.19 ± 0.15 | 0.24 ± 0.17 | 0.16 ± 0.13 | 0.04 |
| Anxious | 0.16 ± 0.15 | 0.14 ± 0.14 | 0.18 ± 0.15 | 0.24 |
The results of TEMPS—A in three groups of athletes studied. Mean values ± SD, differences between groups.
| Groups of Athletes | Differences between Three Groups | Differences between Groups, Mann–Whitney U Test | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Group II | Group III | ANOVA Kruskal Wallis | I vs. II | I vs. III | II vs. III | |
| Depressive | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0.24 ± 0.14 | 0.22 ± 0.10 | 0.74 | 0.52 | 0.74 | 0.78 |
| Cyclothymic | 0.30 ± 0.18 | 0.21 ± 0.17 | 0.17 ± 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.53 |
| Hyperthymic | 0.63 ± 0.16 | 0.64 ± 0.18 | 0.62 ± 0.11 | 0.58 | 0.91 | 0.58 | 0.57 |
| Irritable | 0.24 ± 0.16 | 0.21 ± 0.17 | 0.12 ± 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.48 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Anxious | 0.16 ± 0.16 | 0.20 ± 0.18 | 0.11 ± 0.09 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.29 | 0.05 |
Multidimensional analysis.
| Multidimensional Significance Tests. Parameterization with Sigma Constraints. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect | test | value | F | df effect | df error |
|
| Free value | Wilks | 0.039 | 313.52 | 5 | 64 | 0.0000 |
| Type of athletes training | Wilks | 0.744 | 2.04 | 10 | 128 | 0.0343 |
Figure 2The diagram of normality of residues of affective temperaments dimensions: (a) depressive, (b) cyclothymic, (c) hyperthymic, (d) irritable and (e) anxious.