| Literature DB >> 35207560 |
Tarek M Galal1, Hatim M Al-Yasi1, Mustafa A Fawzy1, Tharwat G Abdelkader1, Reham Z Hamza1, Ebrahem M Eid2,3, Esmat F Ali1.
Abstract
This study investigated the phytochemical contents of Taif's rose pruning wastes and their potential application as phytomedicine, thereby practicing a waste-recycling perspective. In the Al-Shafa highland, four Taif rose farms of various ages were chosen for gathering the pruning wastes (leaves and stems) for phytochemical and pharmacological studies. The leaves and stems included significant amounts of carbohydrates, cardiac glycosides, alkaloids, flavonoids, and other phenolic compounds. The cardiac glycoside and flavonoid contents were higher in Taif rose stems, while the phenolic and alkaloid contents were higher in the plant leaves. Cardiovascular glycosides (2.98-5.69 mg g-1), phenolics (3.14-12.41 mg GAE g-1), flavonoids (5.09-9.33 mg RUE g -1), and alkaloids (3.22-10.96 mg AE g-1) were among the phytoconstituents found in rose tissues. According to the HPLC analysis of the phenolic compounds, Taif's rose contains flavonoid components such as luteolin, apigenin, quercetin, rutin, kaempferol, and chrysoeriol; phenolics such as ellagic acid, catechol, resorcinol, gallic acid, and phloroglucinol; alkaloids such as berbamine, jatrorrhizine, palmatine, reticuline, isocorydine, and boldine. Warm water extract was highly effective against Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, and Proteus vulgaris, whereas methanol and cold water extracts were moderately effective against Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans. The study's findings suggested that Taif's rose wastes could be used for varied medical purposes.Entities:
Keywords: Damask rose; biological activity; phytochemicals; pruning wastes; recycling
Year: 2022 PMID: 35207560 PMCID: PMC8876584 DOI: 10.3390/life12020273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Fresh biomass (mean: upper line, SD: lower line) of the vegetative wastes produced after pruning of four Taif’s rose farms on the Al-Shafa highland.
| Farm | Farm 1 | Farm 2 | Farm 3 | Farm 4 | F-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.5c | 3.7b | 5.2a | 1.3d | 128.5 *** |
| SD | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
Means with the same letter in the same row are not significantly different (Duncan’s multiple range tests at p < 0.05), ***: meam p < 0.001).
Phytochemical constituents (mean ± SD) of the leaves and stems of Taif’s rose collected from different rose farms. Maximum and minimum values are underlined.
| Farm | Carbohydrates % | Cardiac Glycosides mg Securiaside g−1 | Phenolics mg GAE g−1 | Flavonoids mg RUE g−1 | Alkaloids mg AE g−1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farm 1 | L | 1.26±0.05d | 4.33±0.23c | 10.26±1.01b | 5.33±0.62g |
|
| S |
| 4.33±0.20c | 7.22±0.87e | 7.11±1.02c | 7.12±0.94d | |
| Farm 2 | L | 1.69±0.04c | 3.97±0.22e | 8.36±1.32c | 6.14±1.04f | 8.36±2.08c |
| S | 0.96±0.10e | 5.14±0.19b | 6.07±0.71f |
| 8.36±1.62c | |
| Farm 3 | L |
|
|
|
| 10.07±2.12b |
| S | 0.88±0.12f | 4.23±0.26d | 5.36±1.06g | 7.01±0.82d | 4.09±0.26e | |
| Farm 4 | L | 2.36±0.09b | 3.14±0.41f | 8.19±1.04d | 8.76±1.63b | 8.36±1.27c |
| S | 0.79±0.14g |
|
| 6.39±0.05e |
| |
| F-value | 2346.5 *** | 2839.7 *** | 1929.4 *** | 3980.4 *** | 1038.5 *** | |
L: leaves, S: stem, GAE: gallic acid equivalent, RUE: rutin equivalent, AE: atropine equivalent. Means with the same letter in the same row are not significantly different (Duncan’s multiple range tests at p < 0.05), ***: meam p < 0.001).
HPLC analysis of the phenolic concentration of the leaves and stems of Taif’s rose collected from different rose farms. ND: not detected.
| Farm | Phenolics Concentration (mg g−1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gallic Acid | Ellagic Acid | Catechol | Resorcinol | Phloroglucinol | ||
| Farm 1 | L | 5.60 | ND | 23.54 | 34.20 | ND |
| S | 9.45 | ND | 13.44 | 18.74 | 0.96 | |
| Farm 2 | L | 19.58 | 14.50 | 3.54 | 0.25 | 6.24 |
| S | 33.60 | 19.58 | 2.66 | 1.23 | ND | |
| Farm 3 | L | 15.63 | ND | 21.60 | 4.12 | ND |
| S | 13.65 | 1.58 | 6.28 | ND | 0.89 | |
| Farm 4 | L | 16.04 | 1.38 | 6.11 | 9.05 | ND |
| S | 37.40 | 23.54 | 3.96 | 2.74 | ND | |
L: leaves, S: stem.
Figure 1HPLC analysis of the phenolic compounds in the stem and leaves of Taif’s rose collected from different farms.
HPLC analysis of the flavonoid concentration of the leaves and stems of Taif’s rose collected from different rose farms. ND: not detected.
| Farm | Flavonoids Concentration (mg g−1) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quercetin | Apigenin | Luteolin | Chrysoeriol | Rutin | Kaempferol | ||
| Farm 1 | L | 18.77 | 2.6 | 1.99 | ND | 25.3 | ND |
| S | 0.87 | 17.22 | 30.56 | 66.2 | ND | 18.32 | |
| Farm 2 | L | 12.87 | 6.58 | 10.5 | ND | 19.85 | 21.68 |
| S | 17.02 | ND | 25.6 | 44.05 | 3.8 | 38.74 | |
| Farm 3 | L | 1.63 | ND | 18.02 | 19.2 | 6.74 | ND |
| S | 7.15 | ND | 22.6 | 14.8 | ND | 19.23 | |
| Farm 4 | L | ND | ND | ND | ND | 15.6 | 21.5 |
| S | 25.41 | 30.44 | 5.6 | 55.69 | 18.52 | 33.91 | |
L: leaves, S: stem.
Figure 2HPLC analysis of the flavonoid compounds in the stem and leaves of Taif’s rose collected from different farms.
HPLC analysis of the alkaloid concentration of the leaves and stems of Taif’s rose collected from different rose farms. ND: not detected.
| Farm | Alkaloid’s Concentration (mg g−1) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berbamine | Jatrorrhizine | Palmatine | Reticuline | Isocorydine | Boldine | ||
| Farm 1 | L | 3.14 | 0.69 | ND | 2.36 | ND | ND |
| S | 5.24 | 7.13 | 6.36 | ND | 5.69 | ND | |
| Farm 2 | L | 4.69 | 9.5 | ND | ND | 1.6 | N.D |
| S | ND | ND | ND | ND | 3.7 | 0.89 | |
| Farm 3 | L | 1.25 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| S | ND | ND | 2.45 | ND | ND | 0.39 | |
| Farm 4 | L | ND | ND | ND | 1.4 | ND | ND |
| S | ND | 4.44 | 1.69 | 8.5 | ND | ND | |
L: leaves, S: stem.
Figure 3HPLC analysis of the alkaloid compounds in the stem and leaves of Taif’s rose collected from different farms.
Antimicrobial activity (mm) of the different extracts of Taif’s rose leaves on the pathogenic bacterial and fungal strains. NA: no activity.
| Extract | Fungi | Bacteria | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram-Positive | Gram-Negative | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Control | Ketoconazole | Gentamicin | Gentamicin | ||
| 17 | 20 | 26 | 30 | 17 | |
| Methanol | NA | NA | NA | NA | 12 |
| Ethanol | NA | NA | NA | NA | 17 |
| Boiling Water | 12 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16 |
| Cold Water | NA | NA | 10 | NA | 11 |
| Warm Water | NA | NA | 24 | 24 | 41 |
Figure 4Antimicrobial activity of the different extracts of Taif’s rose. 1: stem, 2: leaf, A: methanol extract, B: ethanol extract, C: boiled water, D: cold water, E: warm water.
Antimicrobial activity (mm) of the different extracts of Taif’s rose stem on the pathogenic bacterial and fungal strains. NA: no activity.
| Extract | Fungi | Bacteria | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram-Positive | Gram-Negative | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Control | Ketoconazole | Gentamicin | Gentamicin | ||
| 17 | 20 | 26 | 30 | 17 | |
| Methanol | 11 | 11 | 14 | 13 | 13 |
| Ethanol | NA | NA | 11 | NA | 18 |
| Boiling Water | NA | NA | 12 | NA | 15 |
| Cold Water | 12 | 13 | 12 | 14 | 24 |
| Warm Water | NA | NA | NA | NA | 20 |