| Literature DB >> 35207134 |
Nuria Muñoz-Tébar1, Manuel Carmona1, Gonzalo Ortiz de Elguea-Culebras2, Ana Molina1, María Isabel Berruga1.
Abstract
Films made with mucilage obtained from defatted chia seeds and incorporated with oregano (Origanum vulgare) and savory (Satureja montana) essential oils (0.1,1.0 and 1.5% v/v) were prepared to evaluate their physical, optical, mechanical and antifungal properties as well as their microstructure. The use of different types of essential oils (oregano or savory) only had a significant effect on the light transmittance, total color difference (∆E) and antifungal activity of the films. However, the kind of essential oil was not significant for the physical, optical and mechanical properties of the films. Increasing concentrations of essential oils up to 1.5% v/v led to a decrease in tensile strength (TS) and elongation at break (EB). Antifungal properties significantly increased with the incorporation of essential oils (p < 0.05). The antifungal activity of the chia mucilage films incorporated with O. vulgare and S. montana essential oil was screened by agar disc-diffusion assay against five mold strains commonly found in foods. Films containing 0.1% v/v of essential oils were not active, whereas films containing 1.0 and 1.5% v/v were very effective at inhibiting the growth of the tested mold strains (38.01-77.66%). Scanning electron microscopy showed that incorporation of essential oils caused some heterogeneity in the films and the surface displayed no pores or cracks as well as a better integration of oregano EO in the polymeric network. The results pointed out that the incorporation of oregano and savory essential oils as a natural antimicrobial agent has appreciable potential for the development of films as active packaging to control mold contamination and increase food safety.Entities:
Keywords: antifungal activity; bioactive films; chia by-products; chia mucilage films; essential oils
Year: 2022 PMID: 35207134 PMCID: PMC8875529 DOI: 10.3390/membranes12020213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Effect of oregano (OEO) or savory (SEO) essential oil addition in the physical properties of the chia mucilage films (CM) (mean ± sd).
| Parameter | Concentration | Films | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CM + OEO | CM + SEO | ||
| Moisture | 0.0 1 | 22.44 ± 1.19 a | 22.44 ± 1.19 a |
| 0.1 | 24.80 ± 0.95 ab | 25.73 ± 0.52 ab | |
| 1.0 | 25.31 ± 0.21 ab | 27.60 ± 1.72 bc | |
| 1.5 | 27.69 ± 2.05 b | 30.83 ± 2.76 c | |
| Water solubility | 0.0 1 | 64.45 ± 3.90 a | 64.45 ± 3.90 a |
| 0.1 | 64.98 ± 0.57 a | 65.39 ± 1.00 a | |
| 1.0 | 67.53 ± 0.30 a | 68.64 ± 0.21 a | |
| 1.5 | 75.11 ± 0.66 b | 75.60 ± 0.30 b | |
| Thickness | 0.0 1 | 0.123 ± 0.010 b | 0.123 ± 0.010 b |
| 0.1 | 0.075 ± 0.007 a | 0.082 ± 0.001 a | |
| 1.0 | 0.085 ± 0.001 a | 0.090 ± 0.004 a | |
| 1.5 | 0.092 ± 0.002 a | 0.096 ± 0.004 a | |
| WVP 2 × 10−10 | 0.0 1 | 0.58 ± 0.03 b | 0.58 ± 0.03 b |
| 0.1 | 0.14 ± 0.03 a | 0.14 ± 0.02 a | |
| 1.0 | 0.16 ± 0.03 a | 0.18 ± 0.03 a | |
| 1.5 | 0.17 ± 0.03 a | 0.20 ± 0.01 a | |
1 Values obtained in a previous work (Muñoz-Tebar et al. [12]); 2 WVP: water vapor permeability; a–c Different superscripts between row means significant differences (p < 0.05) due to EO concentration. Data without any superscripts mean that there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) either by the EO concentration effect (indicated with lower case letters) or by the EOs used in the formulation (indicated with capital letters).
Effect of oregano (OEO) or savory (SEO) essential oil addition in the optical properties of the chia mucilage films (CM) (mean ± sd).
| Parameter | Concentration (%) | Films | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CM + OEO | CM + SEO | ||
| L* | 0.01 | 56.42 ± 4.15 | 56.42 ± 4.15 |
| 0.1 | 53.03 ± 0.96 | 51.27 ± 1.90 | |
| 1.0 | 50.64 ± 2.33 | 53.27 ± 1.28 | |
| 1.5 | 50.18 ± 1.45 | 50.32 ± 1.57 | |
| a* | 0.0 1 | 5.45 ± 0.32 a | 5.45 ± 0.32 a |
| 0.1 | 6.35 ± 0.70 ab | 6.93 ± 1.04 b | |
| 1.0 | 7.90 ± 1.63 bc | 6.55 ± 0.54 b | |
| 1.5 | 8.66 ± 0.74 c | 8.74 ± 0.79 c | |
| b* | 0.0 1 | 37.39 ± 4.16 | 37.39 ± 4.16 |
| 0.1 | 37.98 ± 0.41 | 38.13 ± 0.34 | |
| 1.0 | 36.57 ± 1.58 | 36.38 ± 1.17 | |
| 1.5 | 36.31 ± 1.44 | 36.83 ± 0.61 | |
| ∆E | 0.0 1 | 54.40 ± 5.71 | 54.40 ± 5.71 |
| 0.1 | 57.45 ± 0.92 A | 64.33 ± 1.55 B | |
| 1.0 | 58.68 ± 2.37 A | 65.14 ± 0.84 B | |
| 1.5 | 59.01 ± 1.06 A | 63.00 ± 1.50 B | |
| Opacity (%) | 0.0 1 | 26.87 ± 0.75 a | 26.87 ± 0.75 a |
| 0.1 | 28.80 ± 0.11 ab | 28.09 ± 0.50 ab | |
| 1.0 | 29.73 ± 3.18 ab | 29.60 ± 0.75 ab | |
| 1.5 | 31.48 ± 0.32 b | 30.86 ± 2.41 b | |
1 Values obtained in a previous work (Muñoz-Tebar et al. [12]); a–c Different superscripts between row means significant differences (p < 0.05) due to EO concentration. A,B Different superscripts between columns means significant differences (p < 0.05) due to the essential oils used in the film formulation. Data without any superscripts mean that there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) either by the EO concentration effect (indicated with lower case letters) or by the EOs used in the formulation (indicated with capital letters).
Figure 1Effect of oregano (OEO; (A)) or savory (SEO; (B)) essential oil in the light transmittance (%) of chia mucilage films (CM, Muñoz-Tebar et al. [12]). a–c Different letter means significant differences (p < 0.05) due to EO concentration. Data without any superscripts mean that there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) either by the EO concentration effect (indicated with lower case letters) or by the EOs used in the formulation (indicated with capital letters).
Figure 2Effect of oregano (OEO) or savory (SEO) essential oil addition on tensile strength (A) and elongation at break (B) of chia mucilage films (CM, Muñoz-Tebar et al. [12]). a–b Different superscripts means significant differences (p < 0.05) due to EO concentration. Data without any superscripts mean that there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) either by the EO concentration effect (indicated with lower case letters) or by the EOs used in the formulation (indicated with capital letters).
Figure 3SEM micrographs of the film’s surface with different concentrations of oregano (OEO) and savory (SEO) essential oils.
Effect of oregano (OEO) or savory (SEO) essential oil addition in the antifungal activity (halos and percentage of inhibition) of the chia mucilage films (CM) (mean ± sd).
| Mold | Parameter | Concentration (%) | Films | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM + OEO | CM + SEO | |||
| Halo (mm) | 0.0 1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | |
| 0.1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | ||
| 1 | 31.35 ± 2.83 a | 28.94 ± 1.19 a | ||
| 1.5 | 47.90 ± 4.49 b | 41.62 ± 1.70 b | ||
| % inhibition | 0.0 1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | |
| 0.1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | ||
| 1 | 34.83 ± 3.15 a | 32.15 ± 1.32 a | ||
| 1.5 | 53.22 ± 4.99 b | 46.25 ± 1.89 b | ||
| Halo (mm) | 0.0 1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | |
| 0.1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | ||
| 1 | 51.56 ± 0.95 aA | 43.13 ± 1.41 aA | ||
| 1.5 | 64.86 ± 0.06 bA | 69.89 ± 0.82 bB | ||
| % inhibition | 0.0 1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | |
| 0.1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | ||
| 1 | 57.29 ± 1.06 aB | 47.92 ± 1.57 aA | ||
| 1.5 | 72.07 ± 0.06 bA | 77.66 ± 0.91 bB | ||
| Halo (mm) | 0.01 | nd 2 | nd 2 | |
| 0.1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | ||
| 1 | 39.28 ± 0.26 aB | 34.47 ± 0.23 aA | ||
| 1.5 | 62.16 ± 2.34 b | 54.56 ± 5.20 b | ||
| % inhibition | 0.0 1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | |
| 0.1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | ||
| 1 | 43.65 ± 0.29 aB | 38.30 ± 0.25 aA | ||
| 1.5 | 69.06 ± 2.60 b | 60.63 ± 5.78 b | ||
| Halo (mm) | 0.0 1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | |
| 0.1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | ||
| 1 | 28.95 ± 0.41 a | 26.44 ± 1.72 | ||
| 1.5 | 39.45 ± 2.40 b | 38.01 ± 3.91 | ||
| % inhibition | 0.0 1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | |
| 0.1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | ||
| 1 | 32.16 ± 0.46 a | 29.38 ± 1.91 | ||
| 1.5 | 43.84 ± 2.67 b | 42.23 ± 4.34 | ||
| Halo (mm) | 0.0 1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | |
| 0.1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | ||
| 1 | 43.19 ± 4.08 | 33.53 ± 3.97 a | ||
| 1.5 | 56.43 ± 6.74 | 50.38 ± 1.99 b | ||
| % inhibition | 0.0 1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | |
| 0.1 | nd 2 | nd 2 | ||
| 1 | 47.99 ± 4.53 | 37.25 ± 4.41 a | ||
| 1.5 | 62.70 ± 7.49 | 55.98 ± 2.21 b | ||
1 Values obtained in a previous study (Muñoz-Tebar et al. [12]); 2 nd: no inhibition detected; a,b Different superscripts between row means significant differences (p < 0.05) due to EO concentration. A,B Different superscripts between columns means significant differences (p < 0.05) due to the essential oils used in the film formulation. Data without any superscripts mean that there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) either by EOs concentration effect (indicated with lower case letters) or by the EOs used in the formulation (indicated with capital letters).