| Literature DB >> 35206428 |
Yuanjing Wu1, Qianyun Li1, Hanqing Zheng1, Shijie Luo1, Qunyue Liu2, Zhao Yan3, Qitang Huang1.
Abstract
Studies have indicated that urban greenways promote physical and perceived restoration. However, there is a lack of research on the impact of treetop trails on human perceived restoration. In this study, two representative treetop trails in Fuzhou city were selected to investigate treetop trails' impact on users' perceived restoration. The study adopted a structural equation modelling approach to explore the influence mechanisms and pathways of treetop trails on users' perceived restoration, through 412 questionnaires. The results showed that the perceived environmental quality of treetop trails had a significant positive effect on users' overall psychological wellbeing. Place attachment had a significant positive effect on users' perceived restoration and a significant mediating effect on users' perceived environmental quality of trails. The results of this study revealed that the mechanisms of the impact of treetop trails on users' perceived restoration and the construction of treetop trails can be enhanced in the future by improving trail facilities, enriching trail perception of elevated feeling, improving trail landscape quality, and optimising trail design.Entities:
Keywords: environmental quality; greenways; perceived restoration; place attachment; treetop trails
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206428 PMCID: PMC8871920 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Representative photos of the Fu Forest Trail and Jinjishan Forest Trail.
Demographic information of study sample.
| Variables | Title | Frequency | Surveyed (%) | Fuzhou (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 215 | 52 | 51.28 |
| Female | 197 | 48 | 48.72 | |
| Age | 18 and below | 48 | 12 | NA |
| 18–30 | 199 | 48 | NA | |
| 31–40 | 106 | 26 | NA | |
| 41–60 | 49 | 12 | NA | |
| 60 and above | 10 | 2 | 16.76 | |
| Education level | Junior high school or below | 30 | 7 | NA |
| High school | 97 | 24 | ||
| Junior college | 43 | 10 | ||
| College | 135 | 33 | ||
| Master degree or above | 107 | 26 |
Note: The population composition of Fuzhou: 17.08% aged 0–14; 66.16% aged 15–59; and 16.76% aged over 60. The number of people with various educational levels per 100,000 people in the city is 18,589 in college; 17,644 in high school; 30,512 in junior high school; and 24,474 in primary school.
Items, reliabilities, and mean and standard deviation.
| Scale Items | Contexts | Means (SD) | Factor Loadings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perception of trail facilities | A1 Integrity of supporting facilities | 4.159 (1.783) | 0.911 |
| A2 Availability of barrier-free facilities | 4.007 (1.784) | 0.906 | |
| A3 Reasonableness of lighting equipment | 4.332 (1.743) | 0.867 | |
| A4 Friendliness of rest facilities | 4.785 (1.678) | 0.911 | |
| A5 Reasonableness of garbage bin placement | 3.885 (1.599) | 0.889 | |
| A6 Reasonableness of structure distribution | 3.788 (1.505) | 0.870 | |
| A7 Maintenance of supporting facilities | 3.988 (1.726) | 0.835 | |
| A8 Completeness of science information distribution facilities | 4.527 (1.633) | 0.890 | |
| A9 Reasonableness of public toilet distribution | 3.734 (1.675) | 0.898 | |
| Perception of elevated feeling | A10 Safety of overhead passage | 4.002 (1.572) | 0.917 |
| A11 Comfort of overhead passage | 3.837 (1.585) | 0.896 | |
| A12 Novelty of overhead traffic | 3.824 (1.742) | 0.901 | |
| Perception of trail landscape | A13 View of the skyline | 3.910 (1.570) | 0.909 |
| A14 Ecology of the surrounding environment | 3.778 (1.575) | 0.907 | |
| A15 Richness of plants | 3.798 (1.662) | 0.823 | |
| A16 Viewing of water features | 4.185 (1.605) | 0.948 | |
| Perception of trail design | A17 Comfort of overall colour | 3.885 (1.643) | 0.911 |
| A18 Level of adaptation to the terrain | 3.732 (1.652) | 0.903 | |
| A19 Sense of texture of the materials selected | 4.024 (1.773) | 0.834 | |
| A20 Level of integration with the environment | 4.463 (1.683) | 0.908 | |
| A21 Sense of form of the exterior design | 3.700 (1.694) | 0.894 | |
| Place dependence | B1 This is the best place for me to relax and unwind | 4.034 (1.554) | 0.935 |
| B2 I am more satisfied with my activities here than on other trails | 3.851 (1.488) | 0.918 | |
| B3 There is no other trail in my mind that compares to this one | 4.017 (1.632) | 0.733 | |
| B4 I wouldn’t want to do the activities I do here anywhere else | 4.529 (1.607) | 0.792 | |
| B5 Although I can perform activities on other trails, this one is more suitable for me | 3.646 (1.460) | 1.009 | |
| Place identity | B6 I feel nostalgic for this trail | 3.968 (1.590) | 0.910 |
| B7 I identify emotionally with the trail environment | 3.812 (1.593) | 0.888 | |
| B8 This trail has special meaning for me | 4.178 (1.684) | 0.862 | |
| B9 My experience in this trail enriches my understanding of myself | 4.649 (1.678) | 0.889 | |
| B10 I feel like this trail has become a part of my life | 3.807 (1.738) | 0.905 | |
| Perceived restoration | Being Away | 4.051 (1.602) | 0.966 |
| C1 I have an out-of-this-world experience | 3.968 (1.757) | 0.903 | |
| C2 I get a break from the routine of everyday life | 3.778 (1.652) | 0.888 | |
| C3 This is where I can rest completely | 4.159 (1.801) | 0.868 | |
| C4 This place helps me to relax | 4.539 (1.713) | 0.894 | |
| C5 This place makes me feel free from the constraints of work and daily life | 3.812 (1.768) | 0.906 | |
| Soft Fascination | 4.048 (1.551) | 0.986 | |
| C6 The surrounding scenery is coherent | 4.151 (1.737) | 0.939 | |
| C7 I feel curious about the unseen views in the landscape | 4.163 (1.674) | 0.941 | |
| C8 This place creates beautiful associations in my mind | 3.983 (1.624) | 0.900 | |
| C9 The elements of the landscape are well-matched | 3.893 (1.588) | 0.891 | |
| Extent | 4.236 (1.562) | 0.950 | |
| C10 This place has attractive qualities | 4.156 (1.781) | 0.863 | |
| C11 There could be more to explore and discover | 4.685 (1.548) | 0.891 | |
| C12 The environment is charming | 3.876 (1.716) | 0.899 | |
| C13 I want to spend more time watching | 4.227 (1.653) | 0.937 | |
| Compatibility | 4.172 (1.465) | 0.956 | |
| C14 I can do the activities I like | 4.188 (1.363) | 0.941 | |
| C15 I can quickly adapt to such scenarios | 4.007 (1.585) | 0.852 | |
| C16 I feel like I belong here | 3.854 (1.550) | 0.859 | |
| C17 I can find ways to enjoy myself | 4.195 (1.661) | 0.851 | |
| C18 The environment facilitates activities that I enjoy | 4.615 (1.620) | 0.877 |
Confirmatory factor analysis.
| Factors | Cronbach’s α | Average Variance Extracted | Composite Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perception of trail facilities | 0.935 | 0.786 | 0.971 |
| Perception of elevated feeling | 0.930 | 0.819 | 0.931 |
| Perception of trail landscape | 0.952 | 0.806 | 0.943 |
| Perception of trail design | 0.881 | 0.661 | 0.908 |
| Place dependence | 0.950 | 0.776 | 0.945 |
| Place identity | 0.950 | 0.794 | 0.951 |
| Perceived restoration | 0.981 | 0.930 | 0.982 |
Figure 2Standard estimates of the Structural Equation Model Path Analysis.
Tests for mediation effects.
| Hypothesis | Direction |
| Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| PTF→PR | *** | Supported |
|
| PEF→PR | *** | Supported |
|
| PTL→PR | *** | Supported |
|
| PTD→PR | *** | Supported |
|
| PTF→PD | *** | Supported |
|
| PEF→PD | *** | Supported |
|
| PTL→PD | *** | Supported |
|
| PTD→PD | *** | Supported |
|
| PTF→PI | *** | Supported |
|
| PEF→PI | *** | Supported |
|
| PTL→PI | *** | Supported |
|
| PTD→PI | *** | Supported |
|
| PD→PR | *** | Supported |
|
| PI→PR | *** | Supported |
Note: *** p < 0.001.
Tests for mediation effects (extended).
| Direction |
| Direct Effect | Indirect Effect | Total Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTF→PR | *** | 0.116 | 0.119 | 0.235 |
| PEF→PR | *** | 0.190 | 0.150 | 0.341 |
| PTL→PR | *** | 0.136 | 0.097 | 0.233 |
| PTD→PR | *** | 0.256 | 0.136 | 0.392 |
| PTF→PD | *** | 0.183 | 0.000 | 0.183 |
| PEF→PD | *** | 0.256 | 0.000 | 0.257 |
| PTL→PD | *** | 0.176 | 0.000 | 0.176 |
| PTD→PD | *** | 0.282 | 0.000 | 0.282 |
| PTF→PI | *** | 0.253 | 0.000 | 0.253 |
| PEF→PI | *** | 0.303 | 0.000 | 0.304 |
| PTL→PI | *** | 0.190 | 0.000 | 0.190 |
| PTD→PI | *** | 0.244 | 0.000 | 0.244 |
| PD→PR | *** | 0.204 | 0.000 | 0.204 |
| PI→PR | *** | 0.323 | 0.000 | 0.323 |
Note: *** p < 0.001.