| Literature DB >> 35206290 |
James Chung-Wai Cheung1,2,3, Eric Wing-Cheung Tam3, Alex Hing-Yin Mak3, Tim Tin-Chun Chan3, Yong-Ping Zheng1,2,3.
Abstract
Older people are increasingly dependent on others to support their daily activities due to geriatric symptoms such as dementia. Some of them stay in long-term care facilities. Elderly people with night wandering behaviour may lose their way, leading to a significant risk of injuries. The eNightLog system was developed to monitor the night-time bedside activities of older people in order to help them cope with this issue. It comprises a 3D time-of-flight near-infrared sensor and an ultra-wideband sensor for detecting human presence and to determine postures without a video camera. A threshold-based algorithm was developed to classify different activities, such as leaving the bed. The system is able to send alarm messages to caregivers if an elderly user performs undesirable activities. In this study, 17 sets of eNightLog systems were installed in an elderly hostel with 17 beds in 9 bedrooms. During the three-month field test, 26 older people with different periods of stay were included in the study. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of detecting non-assisted bed-leaving events was 99.8%, 100%, and 99.6%, respectively. There were only three false alarms out of 2762 bed-exiting events. Our results demonstrated that the eNightLog system is sufficiently accurate to be applied in the hostel environment. Machine learning with instance segmentation and online learning will enable the system to be used for widely different environments and people, with improvements to be made in future studies.Entities:
Keywords: bed exiting; dementia; elderly; elderly care hostel; night monitoring; nursing home; remote sensing; ultrawideband radar; virtual constraint; wandering
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206290 PMCID: PMC8872318 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Physical and chemical restraint usage rates in countries/regions [39].
Figure 2Floorplan, network connections, server and eNightLog system locations on the field site.
Figure 3Monitor at the nurse station showing the subject status and providing notification.
Figure 4Alarm notification of eNightLog system and room control via a mobile device and applications.
Figure 5eNight System component and setup inside ceiling.
Figure 6The monitoring zones of eNightLog system (bed zone, leave zone, boundary zone).
Figure 7Depth image captured a participant sitting by the bed (left) and user interface indicating different status and alarms (right)—red (exit), yellow (sit in zone), green (lying), grey (empty).
Figure 8Confusion matrix for assisted bed existing (left) and non-assisted bed exiting (right) events.
Bed-exiting event recognition and evaluation results.
| Setting and Outcome | Non-Assisted Bed Exiting | Assisted Bed Exiting |
|---|---|---|
| Total number of events detected | 1042 | 1720 |
| True Positive (TP) | 521 | 860 |
| True Negative (TN) | 519 | 859 |
| False Positive (FP) | 2 | 1 |
| False Negative (FN) | 0 | 0 |
| Accuracy | 99.8% | 99.9% |
| Precision | 99.6% | 99.9% |
| Sensitivity | 100% | 100% |
| Specificity | 99.6% | 99.9% |
Performance of eNightLog in different bedroom layout settings.
| Study | Our Previous Work [ | This Study | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setting | Laboratory Test | Field Test | |||
| Single Bed | Single Bed | Double Bed | Multiple Beds & Rooms | ||
| Assisted | No | No | Yes | ||
| System | IFPM | eNightLog | eNightLog | eNightLog | eNightLog |
| No. of bed-exiting events | 1800 | 1800 | 9000 | 1042 | 1720 |
| Accuracy | 85.9% | 99.0% | 98.8% | 99.8% | 99.9% |
| Precision | 78.6% | 99.2% | 97.8% | 99.6% | 99.9% |
| Sensitivity | 98.9% | 98.8% | 99.9% | 100% | 100% |
| Specificity | 73.0% | 99.2% | 97.8% | 99.6% | 99.9% |
IFPM: infrared fence and pressure mat.
Comparison with different studies in bedside event recognition.
| Sensor(s) | Source | Accuracy | Precision | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrared fence | [ | - | - | 85.3% | 96.2% |
| Pressure mat | [ | - | - | 90.4% | 99.3% |
| Pressure sensor | [ | - | - | 96% | 95.5% |
| Infrared fence and multiple pressure mats | [ | - | - | 92.3% | 99.4% |
| RFID | [ | - | - | 93.8% | 90.8% |
| Thermal array and ultrasonic sensor | [ | 95.5% | 93.8% | 71.4% | 99.3% |
| Kinect | [ | 98.8% | - | - | - |
| Colour Camera | [ | 87.7% | 90.6% | 83.1% | 92.1% |
| Video | [ | - | 59.4% | 97.4% | - |
| eNightLog (this study) | Assisted | 99.9% | 99.9% | 100% | 99.9% |
| Non-assisted | 99.8% | 99.6% | 100% | 99.6% |