Literature DB >> 18218177

Senior residents' perceived need of and preferences for "smart home" sensor technologies.

George Demiris1, Brian K Hensel, Marjorie Skubic, Marilyn Rantz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of meeting the desire of older adults to remain independent in their home setting while controlling healthcare costs has led to the conceptualization of "smart homes." A smart home is a residence equipped with technology that enhances safety of residents and monitors their health conditions. The study aim is to assess older adults' perceptions of specific smart home technologies (i.e., a bed sensor, gait monitor, stove sensor, motion sensor, and video sensor).
METHODS: The study setting is TigerPlace, a retirement community designed according to the Aging in Place model. Focus group sessions with fourteen residents were conducted to assess perceived advantages and concerns associated with specific applications, and preferences for recipients of sensor-generated information pertaining to residents' activity levels, sleep patterns and potential emergencies. Sessions were audio-taped; tapes were transcribed, and a content analysis was performed.
RESULTS: A total of fourteen older adults over the age of 65 participated in three focus group sessions Most applications were perceived as useful, and participants would agree to their installation in their own home. Preference for specific sensors related to sensors' appearance and residents' own level of frailty and perceived need. Specific concerns about privacy were raised.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate an overall positive attitude toward sensor technologies for nonobtrusive monitoring. Researchers and practitioners are called upon to address ethical and technical challenges in this emerging domain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18218177     DOI: 10.1017/S0266462307080154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  30 in total

Review 1.  Ethical challenges with welfare technology: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Aging society and gerontechnology: a solution for an independent living?

Authors:  A Piau; E Campo; P Rumeau; B Vellas; F Nourhashémi
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  A novel approach for discovering human behavior patterns using unsupervised methods.

Authors:  Ju Wang; J Bauer; M Becker; P Bente; L Dasenbrock; K Elbers; A Hein; M Kohlmann; G Kolb; C Lammel-Polchau; M Marschollek; M Meis; H Remmers; H M zu Schwabedissen; M Schulze; E-E Steen; R Haux; K-H Wolf
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 1.281

4.  Understanding views on everyday use of personal health information: Insights from community dwelling older adults.

Authors:  A L Hartzler; K Osterhage; G Demiris; E A Phelan; S M Thielke; A M Turner
Journal:  Inform Health Soc Care       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.439

5.  Older Adults' Perceptions of and Preferences for a Fall Risk Assessment System: Exploring Stages of Acceptance Model.

Authors:  Colleen Galambos; Marilyn Rantz; Jessie Back; Jung Sim Jun; Marjorie Skubic; Steven J Miller
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Generating sensor data summaries to communicate change in elders' health status.

Authors:  G L Alexander; A Wilbik; J M Keller; K Musterman
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  The power(s) of observation: Theoretical perspectives on surveillance technologies and older people.

Authors:  W Ben Mortenson; Andrew Sixsmith; Ryan Woolrych
Journal:  Ageing Soc       Date:  2013-12-03

Review 8.  Applications of technology in neuropsychological assessment.

Authors:  Carolyn M Parsey; Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 9.  Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders.

Authors:  Shira H Fischer; Daniel David; Bradley H Crotty; Meghan Dierks; Charles Safran
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  No Place Like Home? Surveillance and What Home Means in Old Age.

Authors:  W Ben Mortenson; Andrew Sixsmith; Robert Beringer
Journal:  Can J Aging       Date:  2016-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.