| Literature DB >> 35206281 |
Carlo Rossi1, Roberto Roklicer2, Tatjana Tubic2, Antonino Bianco1, Ambra Gentile1, Marko Manojlovic2, Nemanja Maksimovic2, Tatjana Trivic2, Patrik Drid2.
Abstract
(1) Background: Psychological parameters are relevant in the practice of judo. Previous studies have shown that parameters such as anxiety or motivation can have a negative or positive impact on the athlete's performance and general well-being, depending on the athlete's perception. This systematic review aimed to summarize the studies examining the influence of various psychological parameters on well-being and performance in judo athletes; (2)Entities:
Keywords: anxiety; judo; mental toughness; mood state; motivation; performance; psychological preparation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206281 PMCID: PMC8871700 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flowchart PRISMA.
Mood state alterations in judo athletes.
| Authors | Age | Sample | Methods/Treatment | Questionnaire | Parameters | Outcomes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoshioka et al. [ | 19.5 ± 0.6 19.0 ± 0.7 | Weight reduction | POMS |
| |||
| Fatigue | ↑** in WR group (F-U) | ||||||
| Tension | ↑* in WR group (F-U) | ||||||
| Vigor | ↓* in WR group (F-U) | ||||||
| TMD | ↑* in WR group (F-U) | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| All variables |
| ||||||
| Koral, Dosseville [ | Mean age | DIET | POMS | Mood state | T1 | T2 | |
| Confusion |
| ↑* (M, F) | |||||
| vigor |
| ↓* (M, F) | |||||
| Tension |
| ↑* (F) | |||||
| Hernández et al. [ | Mean age | Questionnaire | BL | F-U | |||
| Fatigue |
| ↓* | |||||
| Tension |
| ↑* | |||||
| Vigor |
| ↑* | |||||
| Fortes et al. [ | Mean age | Weight loss (EG) | POMS | Mood state | EG | CG | |
| Tension | ↑* | ↑* | |||||
| Depression | ↑* |
| |||||
| Anger | ↑* |
| |||||
| Fatigue | ↑* |
| |||||
| Confusion |
|
| |||||
| Vigor | ↓* | ↑* | |||||
| Chtourou et al. [ | 21 ± 1 | RPE Scale and Hooper Questionnaire | POMS-f | Mood state | Morning | Afternoon | |
| Vigor |
| ↑** | |||||
| Hooper-Q | Stress | ↑** |
| ||||
| Isacco et al. [ | 24 ± 5 | Weight reduction: psychological profile during 5 successive fights (F1, F5) of a simulated judo competition | POMS | Mood state | Each of the dimensions (mood states) showed a significant time effect ( | ||
| Tension | |||||||
| Depression | |||||||
| Anger | |||||||
| Vigor | |||||||
| Fatigue | |||||||
| Confusion | |||||||
Legend: F4—Fight number four; F5—Fight number five; WR—Weight reduction group; ↑**—Significant increase p < 0.01; ↑*—Significant increase p < 0.05; ↓*—Significant decrease p < 0.05; —Insignificant change; EG—Experimental group; CG—Control group; T1—Four weeks before the competition; T2—One day before the competition; POMS—Profile Of Mood States; POMS-F—Profile of Mood States French version; Hooper Q—Hooper questionnaire; F-U—Follow up measurement; BL—Baseline; n—Number of participants; M—Males; F—Females; TMD—Total mood disturbance.
Influence of other psychological aspects on judokas.
| Authors | Age | Sample | Questionnaire | Parameters | Outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filaire et al. [ | 22.2 ± 1.6 | STAI-Y-2 | Reg. Champ. | Interreg. Champ. | ||||
| Y-2 Trait anxiety |
|
| ||||||
| Y-1 State anxiety |
| ↑* | ||||||
| Cognitive A-state |
| ↑* | ||||||
| Somatic A-state |
| ↑* | ||||||
| Self-confidence |
| ↓* | ||||||
| Filaire et al. [ | Age | STAI-Y-2 | Losers | Winners | ||||
| Behavior type | B | A | ||||||
| Y-2 (trait anxiety) |
| ↑* | ||||||
| Behaviour pattern (Bortner) |
| ↑* | ||||||
| Y-1 (state anxiety) | ↑* |
| ||||||
| Somatic A-state/28 |
|
| ||||||
| Cognitive A-state/28 | ↑* |
| ||||||
| Self-confidence/36 |
| ↑* | ||||||
| Solving problem factor/32 |
|
| ||||||
| Self-blamed/16 (emotion-focused strategies) | ↑* |
| ||||||
| Avoidance/28 (emotion-focused strategies) | ↑* |
| ||||||
| Social support approb/20 (emotion-focused strategies) | ↑* |
| ||||||
| Positive re-evaluation/20 (emotion-focused strategies) |
| ↑* | ||||||
| Gillet et al. [ | Mean age = 18.47 | EPSAS | Self-determined motivation before a competition | Significant correlation between intrinsic motivation and identified regulation ( | ||||
| Kolayis et al. [ | Age | CSAI-2 | State anxiety | Significant positive correlation between the values of age and self-confidence (r: 0.256, | ||||
| Noce et al. [ | N.A. | RESTQ-Sport scores | Pre-comp. Sen. | Pre-Comp Jun. | Post-comp Sen. | Post-comp Jun. | ||
| General Stress |
| ↑# |
| ↑# | ||||
| Emotional Stress |
| ↑# | N.A. | N.A. | ||||
| Lack of Energy |
| ↑# | N.A. | N.A. | ||||
| Success | ↑# |
| ↑# |
| ||||
| General Well-being | ↑# |
| ↑# |
| ||||
| Sleep Quality |
|
| N.A. | N.A. | ||||
| Emotional Exhaustion |
| ↑# | N.A. | N.A. | ||||
| Being in Shape | ↑# |
| N.A. | N.A. | ||||
| Molina et al. [ | Junior | STAI-T | STAI-T scores | The difference for STAI-T anxiety scores were significantly different between females and males only for juniors ( | ||||
| FCQ-T subscales | ||||||||
| Anticipation of positive reinforcement | In the anticipation of the positive reinforcement scale, juniors scored significantly higher than seniors ( | |||||||
| Anticipation of relief from negative states | In the anticipation of relief from the negative states scale, seniors scored higher than juniors ( | |||||||
| Suárez-Cadenas et al. [ | Aged between 16 and 69 | SMTQ | MT | Veterans scored higher than elite and sub-elite athletes on MT ( | ||||
| Perfectionism | Perfectionistic strivings global scores only differed between veterans and sub-elite group ( | |||||||
| Korobeynikov et al. [ | N.A. | Level of motivation | Mental state of high qualification judo athletes with different levels of motivation | Mental efficiency is significantly higher in the group of athletes with a predominance of motivation to achieve success (group 1) compared to a group of groups of judo athletes with average levels of motivation. | ||||
| Silva et al. [ | Mean age = 24.6 | Interview protocol | Mental toughness in judo (elite and sub-elite athletes) | All subjects reported the importance of emotional regulation, resilience, self-confidence, attention regulation, self-motivation, and optimism. | ||||
| Kavoura, Ryba [ | Mean age = 19.6 | Interview | Identity tensions (dual career –plan for the future) | Some female judo athletes may experience identity tensions and lower their athletic aspirations in seeking to meet the new societal expectations embedded in the dual career discourse. | ||||
| Páez-Ardila et al. [ | Age | Staxi | Basal anger out | Significant statistical differences ( | ||||
| Yasar, Turgut [ | Mean age | One-dimension mental toughness scale | Mental | Respondents presented that the mental toughness is positively correlated with age ( | ||||
| Gordon et al. [ | Age range = 20–28 | RWL | Motivation to compete | Intrinsic motivation appears to be the most self-determined construction of motivation, which refers to performing an activity in order to obtain satisfaction and pleasure generated from participation. | ||||
| Negative emotions and struggle | RWL negatively affected emotions. Struggling and anger were observed during the weight reduction procedures. | |||||||
↑*—Significant increase p < 0.05; ↓*—Significant decrease p < 0.05; c—Significantly different p < 0.001 compared to F1; Reg. Champ—Regional championship Interreg. Champ—Interregional championship; Pre-comp—Pre-competition; Post-comp—Post-competition; Jun—Junior; Sen—Senior; N.A.—Not available; ↑#—Significantly higher compared or juniors/seniors; —Insignificant change; MT—Mental toughness; STAY-2—State trait anxiety inventory 2; CSAI-2—Competitive state anxiety inventory 2; RESTQ-Sport scores—Recovery-Stress Questionnaire; SMTQ—Sports Mental Toughness Questionnaire; STAI-T- State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; FCQ-T- Food Craving; STAI—State Trait Anxiety Inventory; STAI-Y-2—State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; EPSAS—Echelle des Perceptions du Soutien à l’Autonomie en Sport; Staxi—State trait anger expression inventory; Stai—State trait anxiety inventory; RWL –Rapid Weight Loss.