Literature DB >> 26151640

Does High Self-Esteem Cause Better Performance, Interpersonal Success, Happiness, or Healthier Lifestyles?

Roy F Baumeister1, Jennifer D Campbell2, Joachim I Krueger3, Kathleen D Vohs4.   

Abstract

Self-esteem has become a household word. Teachers, parents, therapists, and others have focused efforts on boosting self-esteem, on the assumption that high self-esteem will cause many positive outcomes and benefits-an assumption that is critically evaluated in this review. Appraisal of the effects of self-esteem is complicated by several factors. Because many people with high self-esteem exaggerate their successes and good traits, we emphasize objective measures of outcomes. High self-esteem is also a heterogeneous category, encompassing people who frankly accept their good qualities along with narcissistic, defensive, and conceited individuals. The modest correlations between self-esteem and school performance do not indicate that high self-esteem leads to good performance. Instead, high self-esteem is partly the result of good school performance. Efforts to boost the self-esteem of pupils have not been shown to improve academic performance and may sometimes be counterproductive. Job performance in adults is sometimes related to self-esteem, although the correlations vary widely, and the direction of causality has not been established. Occupational success may boost self-esteem rather than the reverse. Alternatively, self-esteem may be helpful only in some job contexts. Laboratory studies have generally failed to find that self-esteem causes good task performance, with the important exception that high self-esteem facilitates persistence after failure. People high in self-esteem claim to be more likable and attractive, to have better relationships, and to make better impressions on others than people with low self-esteem, but objective measures disconfirm most of these beliefs. Narcissists are charming at first but tend to alienate others eventually. Self-esteem has not been shown to predict the quality or duration of relationships. High self-esteem makes people more willing to speak up in groups and to criticize the group's approach. Leadership does not stem directly from self-esteem, but self-esteem may have indirect effects. Relative to people with low self-esteem, those with high self-esteem show stronger in-group favoritism, which may increase prejudice and discrimination. Neither high nor low self-esteem is a direct cause of violence. Narcissism leads to increased aggression in retaliation for wounded pride. Low self-esteem may contribute to externalizing behavior and delinquency, although some studies have found that there are no effects or that the effect of self-esteem vanishes when other variables are controlled. The highest and lowest rates of cheating and bullying are found in different subcategories of high self-esteem. Self-esteem has a strong relation to happiness. Although the research has not clearly established causation, we are persuaded that high self-esteem does lead to greater happiness. Low self-esteem is more likely than high to lead to depression under some circumstances. Some studies support the buffer hypothesis, which is that high self-esteem mitigates the effects of stress, but other studies come to the opposite conclusion, indicating that the negative effects of low self-esteem are mainly felt in good times. Still others find that high self-esteem leads to happier outcomes regardless of stress or other circumstances. High self-esteem does not prevent children from smoking, drinking, taking drugs, or engaging in early sex. If anything, high self-esteem fosters experimentation, which may increase early sexual activity or drinking, but in general effects of self-esteem are negligible. One important exception is that high self-esteem reduces the chances of bulimia in females. Overall, the benefits of high self-esteem fall into two categories: enhanced initiative and pleasant feelings. We have not found evidence that boosting self-esteem (by therapeutic interventions or school programs) causes benefits. Our findings do not support continued widespread efforts to boost self-esteem in the hope that it will by itself foster improved outcomes. In view of the heterogeneity of high self-esteem, indiscriminate praise might just as easily promote narcissism, with its less desirable consequences. Instead, we recommend using praise to boost self-esteem as a reward for socially desirable behavior and self-improvement.
© 2003 Association for Psychological Science.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 26151640     DOI: 10.1111/1529-1006.01431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest        ISSN: 1529-1006


  237 in total

1.  Affiliation Goals and Health Behaviors.

Authors:  Jerry Cullum; Megan O'Grady; Howard Tennen
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2011-10

2.  The Role of Self-Compassion in Development: A Healthier Way to Relate to Oneself.

Authors:  Kristin D Neff
Journal:  Hum Dev       Date:  2009-06

3.  Body image and marital satisfaction: evidence for the mediating role of sexual frequency and sexual satisfaction.

Authors:  Andrea L Meltzer; James K McNulty
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2010-04

4.  Self-esteem modulates medial prefrontal cortical responses to evaluative social feedback.

Authors:  Leah H Somerville; William M Kelley; Todd F Heatherton
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Sweets, sex, or self-esteem? Comparing the value of self-esteem boosts with other pleasant rewards.

Authors:  Brad J Bushman; Scott J Moeller; Jennifer Crocker
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2011-10

6.  The neural basis of trait self-esteem revealed by the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations and resting state functional connectivity.

Authors:  Weigang Pan; Congcong Liu; Qian Yang; Yan Gu; Shouhang Yin; Antao Chen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Adolescent Self-Esteem: Differences by Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Age.

Authors:  Jerald G Bachman; Patrick M O'Malley; Peter Freedman-Doan; Kali H Trzesniewski; M Brent Donnellan
Journal:  Self Identity       Date:  2011

8.  The social determinants of adolescent smoking in Russia in 2004.

Authors:  Olga Kislitsyna; Andrew Stickley; Anna Gilmore; Martin McKee
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  Neural Population Decoding Reveals the Intrinsic Positivity of the Self.

Authors:  Robert S Chavez; Todd F Heatherton; Dylan D Wagner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  When low self-esteem encourages behaviors that risk rejection to increase interdependence: the role of relational self-construal [corrected].

Authors:  Levi R Baker; James K McNulty
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.