| Literature DB >> 35206154 |
Kai Yu1,2, Lirong Wu1, Lujie Zhou1.
Abstract
During the COVID-19 epidemic, many countries faced a critical situation in terms of the global economy and human social activities, including education. In China, the coronavirus is better controlled. Chinese university students have returned to school to study. Despite previous research on online education and learning, the readiness of students for the online and offline learning models implemented at this particular time is not well understood. This paper discusses a hybrid education model for undergraduate students in the safety engineering major. Questionnaires are administered to faculty and students from different colleges and universities in the same major to statistically summarize the influencing factors of mixed or hybrid education. The system dynamics (SD) model is constructed and simulated to determine that using online in the tenth to fifteenth, twenty-fifth to thirtieth, and fortieth to forty-fifth min of classroom teaching (50 min in total) can effectively increase students' interest and engagement in learning. More hands-on activities should also be considered to enhance students' motivation to acquire knowledge, and consideration could be given to encourage interaction among students. This study will be continuously improved by a follow-up study of undergraduate student performance. This study has important implications for educators implementing online and offline blended instruction.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; education model; higher education; offline; online
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206154 PMCID: PMC8872460 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19041967
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Analysis of influencing factors of higher education teaching effect.
Figure 2Distribution of age, gender, and role.
Coefficient analysis of variable Attention.
| Influence Factors | Regression Coefficient Analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | Standard Deviation |
|
|
|
| ||
| (Constant) | 0.004 | 0.142 | |||||
| Style of study | 0.781 | 0.038 | 2.493 | 0.021 | 2.495 | 0.013 | |
| Interest in learning | 0.516 | 0.035 | 1.015 | 0.011 | 2.369 | 0.015 | |
| Self-control | 0.423 | 0.035 | 1.311 | 0.017 | 1.332 | 0.016 | |
Figure 3SD model of Higher Education.
Numerical changes of higher education teaching effect in the initial state.
| Time (min) | Teaching Effect of Higher Education | Time (min) | Teaching Effect of Higher Education |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 300 | 26 | 474.0615234 |
| 1 | 306.6666565 | 27 | 464.0975342 |
| 2 | 308.333313 | 28 | 456.3323669 |
| 3 | 339.3209839 | 29 | 451.8782654 |
| 4 | 389.5473328 | 30 | 451.069519 |
| 5 | 446.8610229 | 31 | 453.5158691 |
| 6 | 499.5984192 | 32 | 458.2820435 |
| 7 | 538.6713257 | 33 | 464.1417236 |
| 8 | 558.8683472 | 34 | 469.8478088 |
| 9 | 559.2457275 | 35 | 474.3663635 |
| 10 | 542.6698608 | 36 | 477.0365601 |
| 11 | 514.7219238 | 37 | 477.6377258 |
| 12 | 482.262207 | 38 | 476.3650513 |
| 13 | 451.9701843 | 39 | 473.731842 |
| 14 | 429.1343384 | 40 | 470.4273071 |
| 15 | 416.8789368 | 41 | 467.1628418 |
| 16 | 415.9060059 | 42 | 464.5370178 |
| 17 | 424.7242432 | 43 | 462.9414978 |
| 18 | 440.2501221 | 44 | 462.519104 |
| 19 | 458.6147461 | 45 | 463.1742554 |
| 20 | 475.9966736 | 46 | 464.6260071 |
| 21 | 489.3226318 | 47 | 466.4874878 |
| 22 | 496.7257385 | 48 | 468.353302 |
| 23 | 497.7125244 | 49 | 469.8772583 |
| 24 | 493.0507813 | 50 | 470.8278198 |
| 25 | 484.4406433 |
Figure 4Trend of higher education teaching effect in the initial state.
Figure 5Teaching effect trend of higher education with different strategies.
Changes in teaching effects with different strategies.
| Order | Strategies | Highest Value | After Class (the 50th min) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect | Time | |||
| 1 | Management | 49.86% | −22.22% | 42.04% |
| 2 | Students | 37.50% | −22.22% | 16.17% |
| 3 | Teachers | 18.32% | −11.11% | 32.34% |
| 4 | Practice | 7.29% | −11.11% | 6.47% |
| 5 | All | 58.09% | −22.22% | 48.50% |
Figure 6Attention sensitivity analysis.
Activity data statistics of online courses.
| Category | Content | Data |
|---|---|---|
| Selected courses | Number of selected courses | 342 |
| Available resources for the course | Teaching video | 84 |
| Total teaching video time (min) | 1000 | |
| Non video resources | 10 | |
| Announcement | Course announcement | 386 |
| Activity | Total number of distribution activities | 167 |
| Total number of participants | 6614 | |
| Total number of sign-ins issued | 116 | |
| Total attendance | 5544 | |
| Total number of votes cast | 72 | |
| Total number of questionnaires issued | 15 | |
| Total number of participation questionnaires | 304 | |
| Total number of responses | 365 | |
| Total number of participating scores | 78 | |
| Total number of in-class exercises | 36 | |
| Total number of tasks involved in grouping | 203 | |
| Tests and assignments | Total times | 161 |
| Total number of exercises | 410 | |
| Number of participants | 339 | |
| Interactive communication | Total posts | 4968 |
| Number of teacher posts | 300 | |
| Number of participants | 300 | |
| Examine | Times | 10 |
| Total number of test questions | 184 | |
| Number of participants | 217 |
Figure 7Analysis of the teaching effect. (a) The 1st teaching cycle of safety evaluation. (b) The 2nd teaching cycle of safety evaluation. (c) The 3rd teaching cycle of safety evaluation. (d) The 1st teaching cycle of safety system engineering. (e) The 2nd teaching cycle of safety system engineering.