| Literature DB >> 35206019 |
Yina Xiao1, Ik-Soo Lee1.
Abstract
Microbial transformation is an alternative method for structural modification. The current study aimed at application of microbial transformation for discovering new derivatives and investigating the structure-activity relationship of isobavachalcone (1), 4-hydroxyderricin (2), and xanthoangelol (3) isolated from the herb Angelica keiskei. In the initial screening process, 1-3 were incubated with microbes using a two-stage fermentation method and analyzed through TLC monitoring. The screening results showed that Rhizopus oryzae and Mucor hiemalis were able to transform 1 and 2, respectively. Additionally, M. hiemalis and Mortierella ramanniana var. angulispora were able to transform 3. Following scale-up fermentation, four new (4, 5, 7, and 10) and five known (6, 8, 9, 11, and 12) metabolites were produced. Cytotoxicity of all the compounds (1-12) was investigated using three human cancer cell lines including A375P, HT-29, and MCF-7 by MTT method. Meanwhile, the tyrosinase inhibitory activity of 1-12 was evaluated using l-tyrosine as a substrate. Overall, 1 and 3 displayed the highest cytotoxicity, and 5 and 7 exhibited the most potent tyrosinase inhibitory activity with relatively low cytotoxicity. This allowed us to postulate that the introduction of 4'-O-glucopyranosyl group led to the reduction in cytotoxicity and improvement in tyrosinase inhibitory activity.Entities:
Keywords: 4-hydroxyderricin; Angelica keiskei; cytotoxicity; isobavachalcone; microbial transformation; tyrosinase inhibition; xanthoangelol
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206019 PMCID: PMC8871312 DOI: 10.3390/foods11040543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Scheme 1Two-stage fermentation method for screening.
1H- and 13C-NMR data for 4, 5, 7, and 10.
| 4 a | 5 a | 7 a | 10 b | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C/H | δH ( | δC | δH ( | δC | δH ( | δC | δH ( | δC |
| α | 7.66 d (15.5) | 118.4 | 7.67 d (15.2) | 118.4 | 7.65 d (15.3) | 118.4 | 7.80 d (15.3) | 117.1 |
| β | 7.82 d (15.5) | 146.4 | 7.84 d (15.2) | 146.4 | 7.83 d (15.3) | 146.4 | 7.84 d (15.3) | 145.0 |
| C = O | 194.5 | 194.5 | 194.5 | 192.5 | ||||
| 1 | 127.9 | 127.9 | 127.9 | 125.6 | ||||
| 2,6 | 7.64 d (8.6) | 132.1 | 7.66 d (8.6) | 132.1 | 7.64 d (8.6) | 132.1 | 7.79 d (8.5) | 131.5 |
| 3,5 | 6.85 d (8.6) | 117.1 | 6.87 d (8.6) | 117.1 | 6.85 d (8.6) | 117.1 | 6.85 d (8.5) | 115.9 |
| 4 | 161.9 | 161.9 | 161.9 | 160.6 | ||||
| 1′ | 116.6 | 116.6 | 116.6 | 114.5 | ||||
| 2′ | 164.1 | 164.2 | 164.2 | 162.4 | ||||
| 3′ | 120.8 | 120.5 | 120.7 | 117.1 | ||||
| 4′ | 162.6 | 162.6 | 162.6 | 161.0 | ||||
| 5′ | 6.80 d (9.0) | 107.2 | 6.82 d (9.1) | 107.1 | 6.80 d (9.0) | 107.1 | 6.74 d (9.2) | 105.9 |
| 6′ | 7.98 d (9.0) | 130.6 | 8.00 d (9.1) | 130.6 | 7.98 d (9.0) | 130.6 | 8.21 d (9.2) | 130.6 |
| 1′′ | 2.81 m | 18.6 | 2.78 m | 18.2 | 2.77 m | 18.3 | 3.44 m, 3.24 m | 21.4 |
| 2′’ | 1.66 m | 43.2 | 1.71 m | 39.2 | 1.69 m | 39.7 | 5.22 m | 121.9 |
| 3′′ | 72.0 | 76.9 | 76.7 | 134.3 | ||||
| 4′′ | 1.28 s | 28.7 | 1.27 s | 25.1 | 1.26 s | 25.7 | 1.90 m | 39.3 |
| 5′′ | 1.26 s | 29.8 | 1.25 s | 25.8 | 1.24 s | 26.6 | 1.99 m | 26.2 |
| 6′′ | 3.31 s | 49.8 | 3.55 q (7.0) | 58.0 | 5.04 t (7.0) | 124.2 | ||
| 7′′ | 1.21 t (7.0) | 16.5 | 129.9 | |||||
| 8′′ | 1.59 s | 25.5 | ||||||
| 9′′ | 1.53 s | 17.5 | ||||||
| 10′′ | 1.75 s | 16.0 | ||||||
| 1′’’ | 5.01 d (7.5) | 102.0 | 5.06 d (7.3) | 101.9 | 5.04 d (7.3) | 102.0 | 5.00 d (7.3) | 100.1 |
| 2′′′ | 3.53 m | 75.0 | 3.52 m | 75.1 | 3.51 m | 75.1 | 3.32 m | 73.4 |
| 3′′′ | 3.49 m | 78.5 | 3.51 m | 78.5 | 3.49 m | 78.5 | 3.39 m | 77.3 |
| 4′′′ | 3.41 m | 71.4 | 3.42 m | 78.4 | 3.41 m | 71.4 | 3.18 m | 69.8 |
| 5′′′ | 3.49 m | 78.2 | 3.50 m | 71.4 | 3.49 m | 78.3 | 3.32 m | 76.8 |
| 6′′′ | 3.92 dd (12.1, 2.0) | 62.6 | 3.93 dd (12.1, 2.1) | 62.7 | 3.92 dd (12.3, 2.1) | 62.7 | 3.71 m | 60.7 |
Assignments were achieved on the basis of 1D and 2D NMR data. The values of J are presented in parentheses. a Data were acquired in methanol-d4. b Data were acquired in DMSO-d6.
Cytotoxic and tyrosinase inhibitory activities of 1–12 a.
| Compound | IC50 ± SD (μM) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A375P | HT-29 | MCF-7 | Tyrosinase | |
|
| 9.78 ± 1.06 | 26.33 ± 2.42 | 24.02 ± 0.36 | >100 |
|
| 25.34 ± 0.66 | 37.30 ± 4.86 | 29.71 ± 2.78 | >100 |
|
| 13.00 ± 1.28 | 24.35 ± 1.27 | 21.92 ± 2.30 | >100 |
|
| >80 | >80 | >80 | 78.47 ± 3.13 |
|
| 77.96 ± 3.44 | >80 | >80 | 28.68 ± 1.24 |
|
| >80 | >80 | >80 | 43.12 ± 6.74 |
|
| >80 | >80 | >80 | 33.32 ± 1.16 |
|
| 29.65 ± 2.09 | 54.36 ± 1.03 | 32.44 ± 0.55 | >100 |
|
| 21.18 ± 0.20 | 58.55 ± 4.19 | 28.18 ± 1.34 | 52.65 ± 2.85 |
|
| 29.03 ± 2.77 | >80 | >80 | 71.71 ± 9.22 |
|
| 69.77 ± 3.88 | >80 | >80 | >100 |
|
| 20.56 ± 2.17 | >80 | 59.01 ± 2.41 | >100 |
|
| 2.52 ± 0.23 | 8.68 ± 0.90 | 2.87 ± 0.38 | |
|
| 77.74 ± 2.55 | |||
a Results are expressed as the mean values of three experiments ± SD.
Figure 1Compounds 4–12 obtained by microbial transformation of 1–3.
Figure 2Key COSY (1H-1H) and HMBC (1H→13C) correlations of compounds 7 and 10.
Figure 3The structural similarity between 4-hydroxychalcone and tyrosine.