| Literature DB >> 35206001 |
Karn Chitsuthipakorn1, Sa-Nguansak Thanapornpoonpong2.
Abstract
The objectives of the study on a continuous flow hot air dryer combined with radio frequency heating at different temperatures (HA/RF) (38 °C, 42 °C, 46 °C, and 50 °C) in a large-scale process compared with conventional continuous flow hot air drying (HA) were (1) to investigate the drying characteristics, drying kinetics, and milling quality of the process and (2) to observe the cooking quality and compare the sensory differences of the cooked rice after treatment. The drying characteristics and moisture diffusivity showed that the higher the radio frequency (RF) heating temperature, the shorter the drying time. The specific energy consumption and energy cost decreased when the RF heating temperature increased. The optimal condition in terms of fissure percentage was HA/RF42. In addition, there were no significant differences in head rice yield and white rice color determination, amylose content, texture profiles, and pasting properties in all HA/RF treatments. In the triangle test, it was found that at least 6% of the population could perceive a difference between HA and HA/RF50. In conclusion, this study proposes the further development of the HA/RF drying process at low-temperature profiles and shows the great potential of RF technology for commercial drying in rice industry.Entities:
Keywords: cooking quality; hot air drying; milling quality; paddy; radio frequency heating; rice
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206001 PMCID: PMC8871306 DOI: 10.3390/foods11040519
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1The industrial-scale continuous-flow hot-air dryer with RF heating machine: (a) prototype machine (b) schematic diagram.
Figure 2Drying rate versus drying time for paddy dried with hot air and hot air combined with various RF heating temperatures.
Figure 3Drying kinetics for paddy dried with hot air and hot air combined with various RF heating temperatures.
Estimated values of the coefficients for selected thin-layer drying models and average effective moisture diffusivity (Deff) of combined RF heating with hot air drying.
| Treatment | Lewis | Henderson–Pabis | Average | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| k | R2 | a | k | R2 | ||
| HA | 1.3405 × 10−3 | 0.9702 | 8.6196 | 1.0373 × 10−3 | 0.9286 | 4.8156 ± 1.4550 |
| HA/RF38 | 1.8522 × 10−3 | 0.9775 | 8.9515 | 1.5357 × 10−3 | 0.9391 | 6.2788 ± 2.3776 |
| HA/RF42 | 1.9998 × 10−3 | 0.9733 | 8.7751 | 1.6038 × 10−3 | 0.9321 | 7.3994 ± 2.0088 |
| HA/RF46 | 2.1854 × 10−3 | 0.9722 | 8.7203 | 1.7436 × 10−3 | 0.9297 | 9.0804 ± 1.6978 |
| HA/RF50 | 2.6657 × 10−3 | 0.9776 | 8.9376 | 2.2164 × 10−3 | 0.9420 | 9.4426 ± 4.0670 |
Data of Deff are expressed as mean ± SD in triplicate.
Electricity consumption, specific energy consumption, and specific energy cost after being dried under various RF heating temperatures.
| Treatment | Power Consumption (kWh) | Specific Energy | Energy Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hot Air Dryer | RF Heating | (MJ/kg-H2O) | (USD/kg-H2O) | |
| HA | 59.33 ± 3.79 c | 0.00 | 4.0367 ± 0.6121 | 0.1098 ± 0.0167 |
| HA/RF38 | 44.67 ± 4.04 b | 10.09 ± 1.15 a | 3.8700 ± 0.2265 | 0.1053 ± 0.0062 |
| HA/RF42 | 40.67 ± 6.11 b | 15.81 ± 3.21 b | 3.9133 ± 0.4574 | 0.1065 ± 0.0124 |
| HA/RF46 | 37.33 ± 7.51 b | 18.53 ± 3.05 b | 3.8600 ± 0.2261 | 0.1051 ± 0.0061 |
| HA/RF50 | 28.67 ± 1.53 a | 24.36 ± 2.00 c | 3.7033 ± 0.4450 | 0.1009 ± 0.0121 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD in triplicate. The same letter or no letter indicates no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the same values in a column.
Effects of different RF heating temperatures on the fissure percentage of brown rice with different fissure degrees.
| Treatment | None | Few | Moderate | Severe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (0 Fissure) | (1–2 Fissures) | (3–4 Fissures) | (≥5 Fissures) | |
| HA | 99.78 ± 0.44 e | 0.33 ± 0.50 a | 0.00 a | 0.00 a |
| HA/RF38 | 98.67 ± 0.50 d | 1.33 ± 0.50 b | 0.00 a | 0.00 a |
| HA/RF42 | 96.33 ± 0.71 c | 3.89 ± 0.78 c | 0.00 a | 0.00 a |
| HA/RF46 | 95.00 ± 0.87 b | 4.00 ± 0.87 c | 0.22 ± 0.44 ab | 0.78 ± 0.67 b |
| HA/RF50 | 85.33 ± 1.87 a | 12.44 ± 1.81 d | 0.56 ± 0.73 b | 1.78 ± 0.83 c |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD in triplicate. The same letter or no letter indicates no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the same values in a column.
Figure 4Morphology of different fissure degrees in white rice: (a) white rice with 0 fissure; (b) white rice with 1 fissure; (c) white rice with 2 fissures; (d) white rice with 3 fissures; (e) white rice with 4 fissures; (f) white rice with ≥5 fissures.
Effects of different RF heating temperatures on the milling yield percentage.
| Treatment | Husk | Brown Rice | White Rice | Head Rice | Broken Rice | Bran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HA | 25.33 ± 0.40 b | 74.67 ± 0.40 a | 65.07 ± 0.80 b | 38.40 ± 2.65 | 26.67 ± 2.00 a | 9.60 ± 0.89 a |
| HA/RF38 | 25.60 ± 0.57 b | 74.40 ± 0.57 a | 63.82 ± 0.96 a | 37.51 ± 2.73 | 26.31 ± 1.94 a | 10.58 ± 1.12 ab |
| HA/RF42 | 25.42 ± 0.78 b | 74.58 ± 0.78 a | 64.44 ± 1.21 ab | 38.22 ± 1.69 | 26.22 ± 1.37 a | 10.13 ± 0.69 ab |
| HA/RF46 | 25.78 ± 0.67 b | 74.22 ± 0.67 a | 63.64 ± 1.50 a | 37.33 ± 2.62 | 26.31 ± 1.47 a | 10.58 ± 1.59 ab |
| HA/RF50 | 24.62 ± 0.78 a | 75.38 ± 0.78 b | 64.62 ± 1.25 ab | 36.62 ± 1.87 | 28.00 ± 1.79 b | 10.76 ± 0.81 b |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD in triplicate. The same letter or no letter indicates no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the same values in a column.
Effects of different RF heating temperatures on the white rice color.
| Treatment | L* | a* | b* | Whiteness Index | ΔE* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HA | 64.51 ± 0.69 | −0.54 ± 0.14 a | 9.02 ± 0.51 a | 63.37 ± 0.65 | 0.00 |
| HA/RF38 | 64.15 ± 1.02 | −0.41 ± 0.27 ab | 9.95 ± 1.13 b | 62.78 ± 1.24 | 1.28 ± 1.08 |
| HA/RF42 | 64.07 ± 1.89 | −0.41 ± 0.27 ab | 9.75 ± 1.14 ab | 62.76 ± 2.06 | 1.76 ± 1.26 |
| HA/RF46 | 64.01 ± 0.81 | −0.36 ± 0.32 b | 10.09 ± 0.41 b | 62.61 ± 0.81 | 1.41 ± 0.51 |
| HA/RF50 | 64.61 ± 1.02 | −0.38 ± 0.29 b | 9.43 ± 0.74 ab | 63.37 ± 0.94 | 1.25 ± 0.53 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD in triplicate. The same letter or no letter indicates no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the same values in a column.
Effects of different RF heating temperatures on the elongation ratio and apparent amylose content.
| Treatment | Elongation Ratio | Apparent Amylose Content (%) |
|---|---|---|
| HA | 1.4257 ± 0.0193 a | 26.74 ± 0.24 |
| HA/RF38 | 1.4264 ± 0.0228 a | 27.76 ± 0.94 |
| HA/RF42 | 1.4377 ± 0.0169 b | 27.07 ± 0.86 |
| HA/RF46 | 1.4533 ± 0.0291 c | 26.75 ± 0.87 |
| HA/RF50 | 1.4530 ± 0.0196 c | 27.68 ± 0.37 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD in triplicate. The same letter or no letter indicates no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the same values in a column.
Effects of different RF heating temperatures on the textural profiles of cooked rice.
| Treatment | Hardness (g) | Adhesiveness (g.sec) | Springiness (sec/sec) | Cohesiveness (g.sec/g.sec) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HA | 10,400.28 ± 253.68 | −145.89 ± 77.63 | 0.6973 ± 0.0151 | 0.4599 ± 0.0029 |
| HA/RF38 | 10,160.72 ± 610.38 | −108.92 ± 24.25 | 0.6560 ± 0.0354 | 0.4548 ± 0.0069 |
| HA/RF42 | 9828.77 ± 109.48 | −123.28 ± 68.41 | 0.6868 ± 0.0470 | 0.4536 ± 0.0064 |
| HA/RF46 | 10,045.50 ± 337.98 | −99.91 ± 69.41 | 0.6736 ± 0.0374 | 0.4572 ± 0.0223 |
| HA/RF50 | 10,340.02 ± 168.02 | −122.87 ± 56.59 | 0.6500 ± 0.0361 | 0.4560 ± 0.0042 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD in triplicate. The same letter or no letter indicates no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the same values in a column.
Effects of different RF heating temperatures on the pasting properties of cooked rice.
| Treatment | Peak Viscosity (cP) | Trough (cP) | Breakdown (cP) | Final Viscosity (cP) | Setback (cP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HA | 1474.78 ± 124.60 | 982.33 ± 108.89 | 492.44 ± 24.39 | 2195.45 ± 162.07 | 720.67 ± 38.11 |
| HA/RF38 | 1591.33 ± 141.81 | 1028.89 ± 121.74 | 562.44 ± 24.93 | 2306.78 ± 200.30 | 715.44 ± 58.51 |
| HA/RF42 | 1503.78 ± 48.10 | 970.56 ± 32.08 | 533.22 ± 76.42 | 2208.45 ± 92.69 | 704.67 ± 138.85 |
| HA/RF46 | 1595.89 ± 258.83 | 1024.78 ± 137.36 | 571.11 ± 121.47 | 2266.33 ± 231.49 | 670.45 ± 32.70 |
| HA/RF50 | 1768.22 ± 220.94 | 1068.00 ± 93.02 | 700.22 ± 127.95 | 2372.00 ± 88.76 | 603.78 ± 133.52 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD in triplicate. The same letter or no letter indicates no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the same values in a column.
Figure 5Triangle test to evaluate the ability of panelists to distinguish cooked rice dried with hot air (A) from cooked rice dried with hot air combined with the different RF heating temperatures (B). The statistical difference was determined using ISO 4120:2004 standardized tables.