| Literature DB >> 35205697 |
Yuya Higashi1, Shuji Ikeda2, Kotaro Matsumoto1, Shinsuke Satoh2, Aoi Komatsu1, Hiroshi Sugiyama2, Fuyuhiko Tamanoi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The KRAS inhibitor KR12, based on pyrrole-imidazole polyamide (PIP), has been developed and shown to exhibit efficacy in mouse experiments. Because some PIP species exhibit tumor accumulation capability, we decided to evaluate whether the PIP portion of KR12 exhibits tumor accumulation. We employed the CAM assay that provides a simple method for tumor accumulation evaluation.Entities:
Keywords: CAM assay; KRAS inhibitor; nuclear localization; pyrrole-imidazole polyamide; tumor accumulation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35205697 PMCID: PMC8869854 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040951
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1Chemical structure of KR12 and KR12-TAMRA.
Figure 2An approach to evaluate tumor accumulation of KR12-TAMRA. (A) An overview of our approach to examine tumor accumulation of KR12-TAMRA. (B) After intravenous injection of KR12-TAMRA into fertilized chicken egg transplanted with GFP expressing OVCAR8 cells, the green fluorescence of the tumor overlaps with the red fluorescence of KR12-TAMRA.
Figure 3Preferential tumor accumulation of KR12-TAMRA. (A) Distribution of KR12-TAMRA was examined by its TAMRA fluorescence one day after the injection. (B) Control shows the red fluorescence of the RITC injected.
Figure 4Overlap of KR12-TAMRA red fluorescence with the green fluorescence of cancer cells in the tumor.
Figure 5Tissue distribution of KR12-TAMRA on tumors and organs in fertilized chicken eggs transplanted with OVCAR8 cells. (A) Time course of tumor accumulation. Tissue distribution 1 or 2 days after injection of 5 µg of KR12-TAMRA. Mean ± SEM (n = 3–6). There were statistically significant differences between the tumor and each organ (p < 0.05). (B) Tissue distribution 1 day after injection of different concentrations of KR12-TAMRA. Mean ± SEM (n = 5–7). There were statistically significant differences between the tumor and each organ (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Nuclear localization of KR12-TAMRA. (A) Uptake of KR12-TAMRA into lung cancer cells examined at low magnification. (B) Higher magnification shows three cells in this field.
Figure 7Tumor growth inhibition of KR12 in the CAM assay. Tumor photo as well as relative tumor weight are shown. A549 CAM tumors after injection of 5 µg of KR12. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3).