| Literature DB >> 35205092 |
Juan M Vázquez-Mosquera1, Aitor Fernández-Novo2, Martin Bonet-Bo3, Natividad Pérez-Villalobos2, Jose L Pesántez-Pacheco4, Maria Luz Pérez-Solana5, Eduardo de Mercado5, Juan Carlos Gardón6, Arantxa Villagrá7, Francisco Sebastián8, Sonia Salomé Pérez-Garnelo5, Daniel Martínez3, Susana Astiz5.
Abstract
Multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) systems have been intensively implemented in Japanese Black cattle in Japan and to create Japanese Black herds out of these areas. Environmental conditions influence MOET efficiency. Thus, we describe results of 137 in vivo, non-surgical embryo flushings performed between 2016-2020, in a full-blood Japanese Black herd kept in Spain and the possible effects of heat, year, bull, donor genetic value, and metabolic condition. Additionally, 687 embryo transfers were studied for conception rate (CR) and recipient related factors. A total of 71.3% of viable embryos (724/1015) were obtained (5.3 ± 4.34/flushing). Donor metabolites did not affect embryo production (p > 0.1), although metabolite differences were observed over the years, and by flushing order, probably related to the donor age. CR was not affected by embryo type (fresh vs. frozen), recipient breed, and whether suckling or not suckling (p > 0.1). CR decreased significantly with heat (44.3 vs. 49.2%; (p = 0.042)) and numerically increased with recipient parity and ET-number. Pregnant recipients showed significantly higher levels of cholesterol-related metabolites, glucose, and urea (p < 0.05). Therefore, adequate MOET efficiency can be achieved under these conditions, and heat stress should be strongly avoided during Japanese Black embryo transfers. Moreover, recipients' metabolites are important to achieve pregnancy, being probably related to better nutrient availability during pregnancy.Entities:
Keywords: Japanese Black; cholesterol; donor; management; recipients
Year: 2022 PMID: 35205092 PMCID: PMC8869101 DOI: 10.3390/biology11020225
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Figure 1Hormonal protocols for superovulation and flushing in donors (A) and for embryo transfer in recipients (B). Abbreviations: IPD = intravaginal progesterone device; PGF = prostaglandin; GnRH = gonadorelin; FSH = follicle stimulant hormone; AI = artificial insemination; ET = embryo transfer.
Donor blood plasma metabolites at embryo flushing and factors affecting Japanese Black heifers submitted to a MOET program at a Spanish farm.
| Year | Flushings Order | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolite | Median (Min–Max) | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 1 to 4 | >4 | ||
| BHB (mmol/L) | 0.42 (0.06–0.89) | 0.80 (0.29–0.89) | 0.37 (0.06–0.60) | 0.43 (0.28–0.76) | <0.0001 | |||
| NEFA (mmol/L) | 0.24 (0.06–0.77) | |||||||
| TC (mg/L) | 110.0 (64.0–181.0) | 114.0 (101.0–167.0) | 134.0 (67.50–181.0) | 86.50 (64.0–134.0) | <0.0001 | 103.60 (74.63–158.28) | 133, 25 (121, 30–141, 25) | 0.022 |
| HDL (mg/L) | 46.0 (19.0–84.0) | 55.90 (35.0– 65.70) | 54.00 (19.0– 84.0) | 32.50 (26.0–43.0) | <0.0001 | 42.65 (31.50–66.93) | 61.43 (52, 39–67, 36) | 0.002 |
| LDL (mg/L) | 14.0 (3.0–28.0) | |||||||
| GLU (mg/L) | 82.0 (60.0–154.0) | 76.0 (62.0–92.0) | 80.0 (60.0–93.0) | 89.50 (73.0– 154.0) | <0.0001 | 84.0 (73.0–107.50) | 71.69 (68, 25–75, 75) | <0.0001 |
| LAC (mg/L) | 19.60 (4.45–87.0) | 25.67 (11.27–30.48) | 17.0 (4.45–53.80) | 20.0 (7.0–87.0) | 0.047 | |||
| TG (mg/L) | 23.0 (14.0–62.0) | 23.0 (14.0–29.0) | 21.0 (14.0–43.0) | 36.0 (22.0–62.0) | <0.0001 | 26.50 (14.75–45.0) | 24.09 (21, 13–27, 31) | 0.033 |
| UR (mg/dL) | 24.0 (11.0–41.0) | |||||||
| FRU (mg/L) | 275.0 (200.0–508.0) | |||||||
| LEP (ng/mL) | 0.19 (0.01–2.28) | 0.11 (0.06–0.27) | 0.84 (0.06–1.48) | 0.08 (0.01–0.39) | <0.0001 | 0.29 (0.08–2.28) | 0.74 (0, 54–1, 09) | 0.016 |
Abbreviations: BHB (beta hydroxybutyrate; mmol/L), NEFA (non-esterified-fatty acid; mmol/L), TC (plasma total cholesterol; mg/L), HDL (high density lipoprotein cholesterol; mg/L), LDL (low density lipoprotein; mg/L), GLU (glucose; mg/L), LAC (lactate; mg/L), TG (triglycerides; mg/L), UR (urea; mg/dL), FRU (fructosamine; mg/L), and LEP (leptin, ng/mL). * Measurements from 76/137 donors.
Conception rate after embryo transfer (ET) of Japanese Black bovine embryos by recipients’ parity, transfer number, and heat stress at ET.
| CR (%; | OR | 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recipients’ Parity | Heifers | 44.3% (148/337) | |||
| Primiparous | 58.3% (67/115) | ||||
| Multiparous | 58.8% (118/235) | ||||
| ET number | 1 | 47.0% (235/499) | |||
| >1 | 52.1% (98/188) | ||||
| Heat Stress at ET | Yes | 44.3% (47/106) | 0.042 | 2.06 | 1.026–4.153 |
| No | 49.2% (286/581) |
Abbreviations: CR = conception rate, OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.
Recipients’ plasma metabolites at embryo transfer (ET) of Japanese Black bovine embryos by the final pregnancy status of the recipients after the ET (pregnant vs. non-pregnant).
| Metabolite | Recipient’s Outcome | Concentration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHB (mmol/L) | Pregnant | 0.38 (0.10–0.58) | 0.32 |
| Non-pregnant | 0.39 (0.21–47.0) | ||
| NEFA (mmol/L) | Pregnant | 0.19 (0.02–0.97) | 0.89 |
| Non-pregnant | 0.18 (0.02–0.86) | ||
| TC (mg/L) | Pregnant | 129.0 (53.0–336.0) | 0.025 |
| Non-pregnant | 138.0 (68.0–353.0) | ||
| HDL (mg/L) | Pregnant | 51.0 (25.0–87.50) | 0.33 |
| Non-pregnant | 53.0 (26.0–88.0) | ||
| LDL (mg/L) | Pregnant | 17.0 (4.0–43.0) | 0.031 |
| Non-pregnant | 20.0 (2.50–40.0) | ||
| GLU (mg/L) | Pregnant | 78.0 (41.0–106.0) | 0.005 |
| Non-pregnant | 83.0 (47.50–127.0) | ||
| LAC (mg/L) | Pregnant | 14.0 (3.50–53.0) | 0.93 |
| Non-pregnant | 14.0 (3.0–73.0) | ||
| TG (mg/L) | Pregnant | 23.25 (10.0–118.0) | 0.113 |
| Non-pregnant | 21.0 (7.50–83.0) | ||
| UR (mg/dL) | Pregnant | 19.0 (7.0–49.0) | 0.024 |
| Non-pregnant | 22.0 (2.0–49.0) | ||
| FRU (mg/L) | Pregnant | 309.5 (197.0–398.0) | 0.158 |
| Non-pregnant | 311.0 (246.0–415.0) |
Abbreviations: BHB (beta hydroxybutyrate; mmol/L), NEFA (non-esterified-fatty acid; mmol/L), TC (plasma total cholesterol; mg/L), HDL (high density lipoprotein cholesterol; mg/L), LDL (low density lipoprotein; mg/L), GLU (glucose; mg/L), LAC (lactate; mg/L), TG (triglycerides; mg/L), UR (urea; mg/dL) and FRU (fructosamine; mg/L). p values obtained the U test of Mann–Whitney. * Measurements from 246/687 recipients.