| Literature DB >> 35204408 |
Gabriela Maria Berinde1, Andreea Iulia Socaciu1, Mihai Adrian Socaciu2, Andreea Cozma3, Armand Gabriel Rajnoveanu1, Gabriel Emil Petre4, Doina Piciu5.
Abstract
There are still many questions remaining about the etiopathogenesis of thyroid cancer, the most common type of endocrine neoplasia. Numerous occupational and environmental exposures have been shown to represent important risk factors that increase its incidence. Updated information about thyroid cancer diagnostics related to occupational and environmental risk factors is reviewed here, considering an integrated risk assessment approach; new data concerning thyroid cancer etiology and pathogenesis mechanisms, diagnostic biomarkers and methodologies, and risk factors involved in its pathogenesis are presented. A special emphasis is dedicated to specific occupational risk factors and to the association between environmental risk agents and thyroid cancer development. The occupational environment is taken into consideration, i.e., the current workplace and previous jobs, as well as data regarding risk factors, e.g., age, gender, family history, lifestyle, use of chemicals, or radiation exposure outside the workplace. Finally, an integrative approach is presented, underlying the need for an accurate Risk Assessment Matrix based on a systematic questionnaire. We propose a complex experimental design that contains different inclusion and exclusion criteria for patient groups, detailed working protocols for achieving coherent and sustainable, well-defined research stages from sample collection to the identification of biomarkers, with correlations between specific oncometabolites integrated into the Risk Assessment Matrix.Entities:
Keywords: environmental risk factors; occupational risk; oncometabolites; risk assessment matrix; thyroid cancer diagnosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35204408 PMCID: PMC8870864 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020318
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Comparative significance of risk categories for current TI-RADS assessment systems (ACR—American College of Radiology [18], EU—European [19] and K—Korean [20]) and the recommendations concerning TN threshold sizes for fine needle aspiration (FNA) and follow-up.
| TI-RADS | Meaning | Risk of Malignancy | Size Threshold for FNA (cm) | Size Threshold for Follow-Up (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TR 1 | Benign (ACR) | - | No FNA | No follow-up |
| TR 2 | Not suspicious (ACR) | <2% (ACR) | No FNA | No follow-up |
| TR 3 | Mildly suspicious (ACR) | 2–5% (ACR) | >2.5 (ACR) | >1.5 (ACR) |
| TR 4 | Moderately suspicious (ACR) | 5–20% (ACR) | >1.5 (ACR) | >1 (ACR) |
| TR 5 | Highly suspicious (ACR) | >20% (ACR) | >1 (ACR) | >0.5 (ACR) |
Figure 1Main risk factors involved in the pathogenesis of thyroid cancer.