| Literature DB >> 35203134 |
Yiran Wei1, Muhammad Idrees1,2, Tabinda Sidrat1, Myeondon Joo1, Lianguang Xu1, Jonghyeok Ko3, Ilkeun Kong1,2,3.
Abstract
Exosomes are nano-sized vesicles with abundant nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, and other regulatory molecules. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of BOEC-Exo on bovine in vitro oocyte maturation and in vitro embryo development. We found that a 3% Exo supplementation to IVM media significantly enhanced the oocyte maturation and reduced the accumulation of ROS in MII-stage bovine oocytes. Oocyte maturation related genes (GDF9 and CPEB1) also confirmed that 3% Exo treatment to oocytes significantly (p < 0.05) enhanced the oocyte maturation. Next, we cultured bovine cumulus cells and assessed the effects of 3% Exo, which showed a reduced level of apoptotic proteins (caspase-3 and p-NF-κB protein expressions). Furthermore, we examined the gap junction (CX43 and CX37) and cumulus cells expansion related genes (HAS2, PTX3, and GREM1) in cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs), and all those genes showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher expressions in 3% Exo-treated COCs as compared with the control group. Moreover, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and lipid metabolism-related genes (CPT1 and FABP3) were also analyzed in both the control and 3% Exo groups and the results showed significant (p < 0.05) enhancement in the lipid metabolism. Finally, the oocytes matured in the presence of 3% Exo showed a significantly higher rate of embryo development and better implantation potential. Finally, we concluded that Exo positively influenced bovine oocyte in vitro maturation and improved the early embryo's developmental competence.Entities:
Keywords: bovine oocyte; cumulus cell culture; embryo development; embryo implantation; exosome; gap junction; in vitro maturation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35203134 PMCID: PMC8868460 DOI: 10.3390/ani12040424
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Primer sequences.
| Gene Name | Primer Sequences | Accession Number |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | F: TTCAACGGCACAGTCAAGG | NM_001034034 |
| GREM1 | F: CAGTGCAACTCCTTCTACATCC | XM_024997728.1 |
| HAS2 | F: TCTCTAGAAACCCCCATTAAGTTG | NM_174079.3 |
| PTX3 | F: CACAGGTCATGTTGTTCCTGAG | NM_001076259.2 |
| GDF9 | F: TGTTTAACCTGGATCGTGTTACTG | NM_174681.2 |
| CX43 | F: CTTTCGTTGTAACACTCAACAACC | J05535.1 |
| CX37 | F: AGCCCGTGTTTGTGTGCCAG | NM_001083738.1 |
| GLUT1 | F: ATCCTCATTGCCGTGGTGCT | M60448 |
| GLUT3 | F: CGCCTTTGGCACTCTCAAC | AF308829 |
| PGK1 | F: CCTGTGGGTGTATTTGAATGG | BT021601.1 |
| CPT1 | F: GAGGGAGACTTTACACGGATGA | NM_001304989 |
| FABP3 | F: GACAGCAAGAATTTCGATGACTAC | NM_174313.2 |
| PPARγ | F: ATATTTCCCTCTTTGTGGCTGC | XM_0249913 |
| CPEB1 | F: GTGTGGAGTGGCCTGGTAAG | XM_864691 |
| SLC2A1 | F: CCCCAGAAGGTGATTGAAGA | NM_174602.2 |
| CD36 | F: ACTGAGGATGACACGTTCA | NM_174010 |
| ATGL | F: CTGCTGACCACACTCTCCAA | FJ798978.1 |
Abbreviations: F, forward; R, reverse.
Figure 1The effect of Exo on oocyte maturation. (a) First polar body (PB) in matured oocyte under microscope and percentage of oocytes with polar body extrusion. Original magnification 100×; (b) The appearance of MII (Metaphase II, matured oocytes) stage after DAPI staining and percent-age of MII stage oocytes. Original magnification 100×; (c) Oocytes after 22 h maturation in control and 3% Exo group stained by DCHDFA and generation of ROS level. Original magnification 40×; (d) relative mRNA level of GDF9 and CPEB1 in control and 3% Exo groups after 22 h of maturation. With a total of 30 oocytes per group and the experiment was repeated for 6 times. Data in the bar graphs represent the means ± SEM from at least three independent sets of experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, and *** p < 0.0001.
Figure 2Effect of Exo on oocyte surrounding cumulus cells. (a) Relative mRNA level of HAS2, PTX3, and GREM1 in cumulus-oocyte complexes. (b) Effect of Exo on junctional communication. The relative mRNA expressions of CX43 and CX37 in mature cumulus oocyte complexes (30 per group); (c) immunofluorescent images of caspase-3 and p-NF-κB in cultured cumulus cells and integrated optical density in both control and 3% Exo groups. Original magnification 100×; (d) Relative mRNA expression of CD36, SLC2A1, and ATGL in control and 3% Exo-treated cultured cumulus cells. Data in the bar graphs represent the means ± SEM from three independent sets of experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, and *** p < 0.0001.
Figure 3Exo addition improves the glucose metabolism and mitochondrial activity during the in vitro maturation of COCs. (a) Relative mRNA level of GLUT1, GLUT3, and PGK in control and 3% Exo COCs; (b) immunofluorescence of SIRT1 expression in COCs and integrated optical density of SIRT1. Original magnification 100×; (c) representative images of JC-1 staining of control and 3% Exo-treated MII stage oocytes; 30 COCs per group. Original magnification 100×. Data in the bar graphs represent the means ± SEM from three independent sets of experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001.
Figure 4Effect of Exo on oocytes and blastocysts lipid metabolism. (a) Relative mRNA expression of PPARγ, CPT1, and FABP3 in control and 3% Exo groups; (b) relative density of lipid was examined in both control and 3% Exo-treated oocytes (30 per group), via Nile red dye. Original magnification 100×. (c) Immunofluorescence of PPARδ in day-8 blastocysts and integrated optical density in both control and 3% Exo groups (15 per groups). Original magnification 40×. (d) The effect of Exo on blastocyst implantation potential was determined. Colored BF (bright field), BF, and DAPI images Scheme 3. Exo groups. Original magnification 40×. Data in the bar graphs represent the means ± SEM from three independent sets of experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001.
Bovine blastocysts developed from oocytes treated with Exo and control groups.
| Groups | Oocytes, | Presumed | ≥8-cell | Total | Hatched |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 314 | 294 | 164 (55.8 ± 3.40) b | 83 (28.2± 1.08) b | 18 (20.5 ± 4.24) a |
| 3% Exo | 312 | 288 | 191 (66.3 ± 2.90) a | 104 (36.1 ± 0.67) a | 32 (27.9 ± 3.83) a |
a,b Values with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).