Literature DB >> 22408180

Metabolism of the preimplantation embryo: 40 years on.

Henry J Leese1.   

Abstract

This review considers how our understanding of preimplantation embryo metabolism has progressed since the pioneering work on this topic in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Research has been stimulated by a desire to understand how metabolic events contribute to the development of the zygote into the blastocyst, the need for biomarkers of embryo health with which to improve the success of assisted conception technologies, and latterly by the 'Developmental Origins of Health and Disease' (DOHaD) concept. However, arguably, progress has not been as great as it might have been due to methodological difficulties in working with tiny amounts of tissue and the low priority assigned to fundamental research on fertility and infertility, with developments driven more by technical than scientific advances. Nevertheless, considerable progress has been made in defining the roles of the traditional nutrients: pyruvate, glucose, lactate, and amino acids; originally considered as energy sources and biosynthetic precursors, but now recognized as having multiple, overlapping functions. Other nutrients; notably lipids, are beginning to attract the attention they deserve. The pivotal role of mitochondria in early embryo development and the DOHaD concept, and in providing a cellular focus for metabolic events is now recognized. Some unifying ideas are discussed; namely 'stress-response models' and the 'quiet embryo hypothesis'; the latter aiming to relate the metabolism of individual preimplantation embryos to their subsequent viability. The review concludes by updating the state of knowledge of preimplantation embryo metabolism in the early 1970s and listing some future research questions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22408180     DOI: 10.1530/REP-11-0484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reproduction        ISSN: 1470-1626            Impact factor:   3.906


  82 in total

1.  Use of a mouse in vitro fertilization model to understand the developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis.

Authors:  Sky K Feuer; Xiaowei Liu; Annemarie Donjacour; Wingka Lin; Rhodel K Simbulan; Gnanaratnam Giritharan; Luisa Delle Piane; Kevin Kolahi; Kurosh Ameri; Emin Maltepe; Paolo F Rinaudo
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.736

2.  Nuclear Localization of Mitochondrial TCA Cycle Enzymes as a Critical Step in Mammalian Zygotic Genome Activation.

Authors:  Raghavendra Nagaraj; Mark S Sharpley; Fangtao Chi; Daniel Braas; Yonggang Zhou; Rachel Kim; Amander T Clark; Utpal Banerjee
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Does serum cause lipid-droplet accumulation in bovine embryos produced in vitro, during developmental days 1 to 4?

Authors:  Melisa Candela Crocco; Diana Mabel Kelmansky; Marta Inés Mariano
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Connections between preimplantation embryo physiology and culture.

Authors:  Jay M Baltz
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Preimplantation stress and development.

Authors:  Sky Feuer; Paolo Rinaudo
Journal:  Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today       Date:  2012-12

Review 6.  Pluripotent stem cell energy metabolism: an update.

Authors:  Tara Teslaa; Michael A Teitell
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  Metabolic restructuring and cell fate conversion.

Authors:  Alessandro Prigione; María Victoria Ruiz-Pérez; Raul Bukowiecki; James Adjaye
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Heat Oscillations Driven by the Embryonic Cell Cycle Reveal the Energetic Costs of Signaling.

Authors:  Jonathan Rodenfels; Karla M Neugebauer; Jonathon Howard
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 12.270

9.  Should the flexibility enabled by performing a day-4 embryo transfer remain as a valid option in the IVF laboratory? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Simopoulou; K Sfakianoudis; P Tsioulou; A Rapani; E Maziotis; P Giannelou; S Grigoriadis; A Pantou; K Nikolettos; N Vlahos; K Pantos; M Koutsilieris
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  CoQ10 increases mitochondrial mass and polarization, ATP and Oct4 potency levels, and bovine oocyte MII during IVM while decreasing AMPK activity and oocyte death.

Authors:  M K Abdulhasan; Q Li; J Dai; H M Abu-Soud; E E Puscheck; D A Rappolee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.