| Literature DB >> 35202419 |
Nabil A Alhakamy1,2,3,4, Solomon Z Okbazghi5, Mohamed A Alfaleh6, Wesam H Abdulaal7,8, Rana B Bakhaidar1, Mohammed O Alselami1, Majed Al Zahrani1, Hani M Alqarni1, Adel F Alghaith9, Sultan Alshehri9,10, Shaimaa M Badr-Eldin1,11, Hibah M Aldawsari1,2,3, Omar D Al-Hejaili1, Bander M Aldhabi1, Wael A Mahdi9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer in men and women is considered the leading cause for cancer-related mortality worldwide. Anti-cancer peptides represent a potential untapped reservoir of effective cancer therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35202419 PMCID: PMC8872391 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Independent variables’ levels and response constraint used in the Box-Behnken design for the optimization of ALS-MP nanoconjugates.
| Independent variables | Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (-1) | (0) | (+1) | |
|
| 1:1 | 1:5.5 | 1:10 |
|
| 10 | 35 | 60 |
|
| 3.0 | 6.5 | 10.0 |
|
| Desirability constraint | ||
|
| Minimize | ||
Abbreviations: ALS, Alendronate sodium; MP, Mastoparan peptide.
Variables levels and observed response (particle size) for ALS-MP nanoconjugates experimental runs formulated according to Box-Behnken design generated.
| Experimental run | Independent variables | Dependent variables | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP: ALS molar ratio | Incubation time (min) | Sonication time (min) | Particle size (nm) | |
|
|
| 10 | 6.5 | 291.6±2.3 |
|
|
| 35 | 6.5 | 222.5± 3.5 |
|
|
| 35 | 10.0 | 315.8±10.3 |
|
|
| 60 | 6.5 | 181.9±12.3 |
|
|
| 35 | 10.0 | 143.2±9.3 |
|
|
| 10 | 3.0 | 218.5±10.3 |
|
|
| 35 | 3.0 | 164.7±8.3 |
|
|
| 60 | 10.0 | 241.8±10.3 |
|
|
| 35 | 3.0 | 322.1±9.5 |
|
|
| 35 | 6.5 | 221.3±.11.2 |
|
|
| 10 | 6.5 | 133.9±10.3 |
|
|
| 35 | 6.5 | 222.4±12.4 |
|
|
| 60 | 3.0 | 268.6±9.4 |
|
|
| 10 | 10.0 | 210.3±15.3 |
|
|
| 60 | 6.5 | 343.4±18.3 |
Model fit statistics for the particle size of ALS-MP nanoconjugates.
| Source | SD | R2 | Adjusted R2 | Predicted R2 | PRESS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linear | 7.97 | 0.9880 | 0.9847 | 0.9808 | 1118.31 |
| 2FI | 8.34 | 0.9904 | 0.9833 | 0.9765 | 1366.96 |
| Quadratic | 3.59 | 0.9989 | 0.9969 | 0.9824 | 1021.50 |
Abbreviations: ALS, Alendronate sodium; MP, Mastoparan peptide; SD, standard deviation; PRESS, predicted residual error sum of squares; 2FI, two-factor interaction.
Fig 1Diagnostic plots for particle size of ALS-MP nanoconjugates: (A) Box-Cox for power transforms, (B) externally studentized residuals vs. predicted particle size, (C) ex-ternally studentized residuals vs. run number, and (D) predicted vs. actual particle size.
Abbreviations: ALS, Alendronate sodium; MP, Mastoparan peptide.
Fig 2Response 3D-plots (A-C) and contour 2D-plots (D-F) for the influence of ALS:MP molar ratio (X1), incubation time (X2), and sonication (X3) on the particle size of ALS-MP nanoconjugates.
Fig 3The in vitro release pattern of drug from optimized ALS-MP and ALS-raw.
Fig 4Comparative cytotoxicity of various samples in terms of IC50.
*Significantly different from Staurosporine p<0.05, #significantly different from MP p<0.05, $signifi-cantly different from ALS p<0.05.
Fig 5Effect of various formulations on cell cycle.
*Significantly different from control p<0.05, #significantly different from MP p<0.05, $significantly different from ALS-Raw p<0.05.
Fig 6Determination of cellular mortality after Annexin V staining by flow cytometry.
*Significantly different from control p<0.05, #significantly different from MP p<0.05, $sig-nificantly different from ALS-Raw p<0.05.
Fig 7Comparative effects of ALS-MP on Caspase 3.
*Significantly different from control p<0.05, #significantly different from MP p<0.05.