Literature DB >> 27683176

Oral Bisphosphonates and Improved Survival of Breast Cancer.

Gad Rennert1, Mila Pinchev2, Naomi Gronich2, Walid Saliba2, Anath Flugelman2, Idit Lavi2, Hadassah Goldberg3, Georgeta Fried4, Mariana Steiner5, Arie Bitterman6, Keren Landsman2, Hedy S Rennert2.   

Abstract

Purpose: Bisphosphonates are used for treatment or prevention of osteoporosis and of bone metastases. The use of oral bisphosphonates was suggested to be associated with reduced risk of developing breast cancer, and their positive influence on breast cancer survival was only demonstrated with third-generation bisphosphonates. We studied the association of use of oral bisphosphonates after breast cancer diagnosis on overall and breast cancer survival.Experimental Design: A nested case-control analysis was performed using data from the population-based Breast Cancer in Northern Israel Study (BCINIS). Participants were postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed breast cancer insured by Clalit. Use of second-generation bisphosphonates (alendronate and/or risedronate) was identified using computerized prescription records. The analysis was restricted to women who did not use bisphosphonates prior to diagnosis.
Results: In a cohort of 3,731 postmenopausal women with breast cancer, followed up for an average of 70 months, there were 799 cases of death which were matched to 15,915 control periods of living breast cancer cases. Use of bisphosphonates after diagnosis for at least 18 months was significantly more common among survivors than among their matched controls who died, adjusted for tumor stage/grade (overall survival: OR = 0.63, 0.41-0.96, P = 0.03; breast cancer-specific survival: OR = 0.28, 0.09-0.91, P = 0.035). A similar advantageous effect, but statistically underpowered, was found in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, ER-negative, and HER2neu-positive tumors.Conclusions: The use of oral bisphosphonates, by postmenopausal, probably osteoporotic, women initiated after diagnosis of breast cancer was associated with a significant improvement in overall and breast-specific odds of survival. Clin Cancer Res; 23(7); 1684-9. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27683176     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  17 in total

1.  Bisphosphonates Zometa and Fosamax Synergize with Metformin to Prevent AOM-Induced Colon Cancer in F344 Rat Model.

Authors:  Venkateshwar Madka; Gaurav Kumar; Gopal Pathuri; Yuting Zhang; Stanley Lightfoot; Adam S Asch; Altaf Mohammed; Vernon E Steele; Chinthalapally V Rao
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-11-07

2.  Women with cancer in low-income countries.

Authors:  S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Periodontal Treatment in Cancer Patients: An Interdisciplinary Approach.

Authors:  A M Decker; L S Taichman; N J D'Silva; R S Taichman
Journal:  Curr Oral Health Rep       Date:  2018-01-27

Review 4.  Management of Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Bone Loss (AIBL) in postmenopausal women with hormone sensitive breast cancer: Joint position statement of the IOF, CABS, ECTS, IEG, ESCEO IMS, and SIOG.

Authors:  Peyman Hadji; Matti S Aapro; Jean-Jacques Body; Michael Gnant; Maria Luisa Brandi; Jean Yves Reginster; M Carola Zillikens; Claus-C Glüer; Tobie de Villiers; Rod Baber; G David Roodman; Cyrus Cooper; Bente Langdahl; Santiago Palacios; John Kanis; Nasser Al-Daghri; Xavier Nogues; Erik Fink Eriksen; Andreas Kurth; Rene Rizzoli; Robert E Coleman
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.072

5.  Estradiol impairs the antiproliferative and proapoptotic effect of Zoledronic acid in hormone sensitive breast cancer cells in vitro.

Authors:  Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich; Sigrid Weingartshofer; Thomas W Grunt; Mario Mairhofer; Yen Tan; Jutta Gamper; Christian F Singer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prognostic Effect of Bisphosphonate Exposure for Patients With Diagnosed Solid Cancer: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Dan-Ting Wen; Zheng Xu; Mei-Ling Xuan; Guo-Rong Liang; Wei-Ling Zheng; Xue-Fang Liang; Jing Xiao; Xiao-Yun Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Exploiting bone niches: progression of disseminated tumor cells to metastasis.

Authors:  Aaron M Muscarella; Sergio Aguirre; Xiaoxin Hao; Sarah M Waldvogel; Xiang H-F Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 8.  Targeting Histone Modifications in Bone and Lung Metastatic Cancers.

Authors:  Courtney M Edwards; Rachelle W Johnson
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 5.163

9.  Anti-Tumor Activity and Immunotherapeutic Potential of a Bisphosphonate Prodrug.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Tanaka; Masashi Iwasaki; Kaoru Murata-Hirai; Kenji Matsumoto; Kosuke Hayashi; Haruki Okamura; Tomoharu Sugie; Nagahiro Minato; Craig T Morita; Masakazu Toi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Exposure to alendronate is associated with a lower risk of bone metastases in osteoporotic women with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Vanessa Rouach; Inbal Goldshtein; Ido Wolf; Raphael Catane; Gabriel Chodick; Amit Iton; Naftali Stern; Daniel Cohen
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.072

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.