Literature DB >> 35201914

Informed consent for stochastic effects of ionising radiation in diagnostic imaging.

Richard Mendelson1,2.   

Abstract

The ethical and legal principles underpinning the requirement for informed consent for medical procedures are widely accepted. A recent BJR article has applied these principles to the issue of consent to ionising radiation (IR) from diagnostic imaging (DI), but the authors chose to put aside the practical problems associated with this. These problems should not be underestimated and arise from: uncertainties about the existence and magnitude of risk of stochastic effects of IR exposure in DI; the delayed manifestation of its effects; the heterogeneity of risk related to factors associated with individual sensitivity to IR, and dose variation even within examination classes and across clinical indications; and the difficulty of communication of these uncertainties and variations to patients. This article discusses these practical issues associated with consent for IR in DI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35201914      PMCID: PMC9153697          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20211265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.629


  10 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review on physician's knowledge about radiation doses and radiation risks of computed tomography.

Authors:  Lucian Krille; Gaël P Hammer; Hiltrud Merzenich; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Knowledge of medical imaging radiation dose and risk among doctors.

Authors:  Nicholas Brown; Lee Jones
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 1.735

3.  Justification of diagnostic medical exposures: some practical issues. Report of an International Atomic Energy Agency Consultation.

Authors:  J Malone; R Guleria; C Craven; P Horton; H Järvinen; J Mayo; G O'reilly; E Picano; D Remedios; J Le Heron; M Rehani; O Holmberg; R Czarwinski
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy.

Authors:  William R Hendee; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Student and intern awareness of ionising radiation exposure from common diagnostic imaging procedures.

Authors:  G Z Zhou; D D Wong; L K Nguyen; R M Mendelson
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.735

6.  Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients.

Authors:  Lawrence T Dauer; Raymond H Thornton; Jennifer L Hay; Rochelle Balter; Matthew J Williamson; Jean St Germain
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Shared decision-making: is it time to obtain informed consent before radiologic examinations utilizing ionizing radiation? Legal and ethical implications.

Authors:  Leonard Berlin
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Does radiology require informed consent for radiation risk?

Authors:  Elizabeth M Davies; Andrew J Bridges; Emma Ml Chung
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Barriers and pathways to informed consent for ionising radiation imaging examinations: A qualitative study.

Authors:  C W E Younger; S Moran; C Douglas; H Warren-Forward
Journal:  Radiography (Lond)       Date:  2019-04-02

10.  Patient Knowledge and Perception of Radiation Risk in Diagnostic Imaging: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Stephen John Sweetman; Jason Bernard
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2019-02-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.