Literature DB >> 22078333

Preoperative prostate-specific antigen isoform p2PSA and its derivatives, %p2PSA and prostate health index, predict pathologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Giorgio Guazzoni1, Massimo Lazzeri, Luciano Nava, Giovanni Lughezzani, Alessandro Larcher, Vincenzo Scattoni, Giulio Maria Gadda, Vittorio Bini, Andrea Cestari, Nicolò Maria Buffi, Massimo Freschi, Patrizio Rigatti, Francesco Montorsi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently available predictive models fail to assist clinical decision making in prostate cancer (PCa) patients who are possible candidates for radical prostatectomy (RP). New biomarkers would be welcome.
OBJECTIVE: Test the hypothesis that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA and its derivates, percentage of p2PSA to free PSA (%p2PSA) and the Prostate Health Index (PHI), predict PCa characteristics at final pathology after RP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An observational prospective study was performed in 350 consecutive men diagnosed with clinically localised PCa who underwent RP. MEASUREMENTS: We determined the predictive accuracy of serum total PSA (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA), fPSA-to-tPSA ratio (%fPSA), p2PSA, %p2PSA, and PHI. The primary end point was to determine the accuracy of these biomarkers in predicting the presence of pT3 disease, pathologic Gleason sum≥7, Gleason sum upgrading, and tumour volume<0.5 ml. INTERVENTION: Open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic RP was performed. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed according to baseline oncologic parameters and the surgeon's judgement. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The %p2PSA and PHI levels were significantly higher in patients with pT3 disease, pathologic Gleason sum≥7, and Gleason sum upgrading (all p values<0.001). Conversely, %p2PSA and PHI levels were significantly lower in patients with tumour volume<0.5 ml (p<0.001). By univariate analysis, both %p2PSA and PHI were accurate predictors of pT3 disease, pathologic Gleason sum≥7, Gleason sum upgrading, and tumour volume<0.5 ml. By multivariate analyses, the inclusion of both %p2PSA and PHI significantly increased the predictive accuracy of a base multivariate model (excluding the tumour volume prediction for both variables, and Gleason sum upgrading for the model including %p2PSA) that included patient age, tPSA, fPSA, f/tPSA, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason sum.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that p2PSA and its derivatives are predictors of PCa characteristics at final pathology after RP and are more accurate than currently available markers.
Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22078333     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  35 in total

1.  Comparison Between the Four-kallikrein Panel and Prostate Health Index for Predicting Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Tobias Nordström; Andrew Vickers; Melissa Assel; Hans Lilja; Henrik Grönberg; Martin Eklund
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Clinical and Novel Biomarkers in the Management of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Cristóbal Sanhueza; Manish Kohli
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-02-08

3.  PHI and PCA3 improve the prognostic performance of PRIAS and Epstein criteria in predicting insignificant prostate cancer in men eligible for active surveillance.

Authors:  Francesco Cantiello; Giorgio Ivan Russo; Antonio Cicione; Matteo Ferro; Sebastiano Cimino; Vincenzo Favilla; Sisto Perdonà; Ottavio De Cobelli; Carlo Magno; Giuseppe Morgia; Rocco Damiano
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Clinical performance of serum [-2]proPSA derivatives, %p2PSA and PHI, in the detection and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ya-Qiang Huang; Tong Sun; Wei-De Zhong; Chin-Lee Wu
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2014-12-25

5.  Use of high-resolution micro-ultrasound to predict extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer prior to surgery: a prospective single-institutional study.

Authors:  Vittorio Fasulo; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Federica Regis; Marco Paciotti; Fancesco Persico; Davide Maffei; Alessandro Uleri; Alberto Saita; Paolo Casale; Rodolfo Hurle; Massimo Lazzeri; Giorgio Guazzoni; Giovanni Lughezzani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  The Prostate Health Index: Its Utility in Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Abbey Lepor; William J Catalona; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.241

7.  Can one blood draw replace transrectal ultrasonography-estimated prostate volume to predict prostate cancer risk?

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Mari T Peltola; Daniel Sjoberg; Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 8.  PSA, PSA derivatives, proPSA and prostate health index in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sema Nur Ayyıldız; Ali Ayyıldız
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-06

Review 9.  Emerging PSA-based tests to improve screening.

Authors:  Richard J Bryant; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 10.  Beyond prostate-specific antigen: utilizing novel strategies to screen men for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Hans Lilja; Andrew Vickers
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.309

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.