| Literature DB >> 35200081 |
Guosheng Xin1,2, Jie Yang1,2, Ruiguo Li1,2, Qiaoxian Gao1,2, Ronglin Li3, Jianguo Wang3, Juan Zhang4, Jing Wang5.
Abstract
Present study aimed to evaluate the influence of distinct concentration of dietary supplements hemp oil on apparent nutrient digestibility, blood biochemical parameters and metabolomics of teddy dogs. A total of 25 healthy teddy dogs were selected and divided into five treatments according to diet supplements hemp oil at a rate of 0% (A), 0.5% (B), 1% (C), 2% (D), and 4% (E). Appropriate added hemp oil improved apparent nutrient digestibility of dry matter, crude protein and crude fat (86.32-88.08%, 86.87-88.87% and 96.76-97.43%). The hemp oil significantly increased blood biochemical of utilization related total protein, albumin and globulin (61.33-69.54, 35.08-40.38 and 26.53-31.63 g/L), immunity capacity related immunoglobulin E and γ-interferon (203-347kU/L and 23.04-25.78ng/L), energy-related thyroxine and triiodothyronine (27.11-36.75 and 0.94-1.67 nmol/L). In addition, hemp oil improved superoxide dismutation (26.47-33.02 U/ml) and reduced malondialdehyde (5.30-3.28 nmol/ml). The differential metabolites mainly included nucleotides and metabolites of oxidized lipids, bile and other fatty acids, coenzymes and vitamins. The main metabolic pathways included purine and arachidonic acid metabolism, bile and unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis, cell oxidative phosphorylation and rheumatoid arthritis. Overall, appropriate dietary supplements hemp oil positively to nutrient digestibility and blood metabolism, immunity and antioxidant capacity, 1% to 2% hemp oil supplements was recommended for teddy dog diet.Entities:
Keywords: Hemp oil; blood biochemistry; dog; metabolomics; nutrient digestibility
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35200081 PMCID: PMC8974180 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2043018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Fatty acid composition of hemp seed oil
| Fatty acid composition | Content % | |
|---|---|---|
| C4:0 | Butyrate | 0.05 |
| C14:0 | Myristic acid | 0.03 |
| C15:0 | Pentadecanoic acid | 0.23 |
| C16:0 | Palmitic acid | 6.33 |
| C16:1 | Palmitoleic acid | 0.09 |
| C17:0 | Margaric | 0.05 |
| C17:1 | Margaroleic | 0.03 |
| C18:0 | Stearic | 2.88 |
| C18:1n9t | Trans-elaidic | 0.00 |
| C18:1n9c | Oleic | 13.05 |
| C18:2n6c | Linoleic | 58.71 |
| C20:0 | Arachidic | 0.69 |
| C18:3n6 | γ-Linolenic | 0.67 |
| C18:3n3 | α-Linolenic | 16.81 |
| C20:2 | Eicosadienoic | 0.05 |
| C22:0 | Behenic | 0.24 |
| C24:0 | Lignoceric | 0.08 |
| UFA Unsaturated fatty acid | 89.42 | |
| SFA Saturated fatty acid | 10.58 | |
Composition and nutrient level of experimental diets (Dry matter basis)
| Items | Content % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | |
| Ingredients | |||||
| Chicken bone meal | 10.20 | 10.21 | 10.24 | 10.27 | 10.29 |
| Poultry by-product meal | 15.01 | 14.99 | 14.97 | 14.93 | 14.92 |
| Chicken liver powder | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Corn flour | 18.95 | 18.96 | 19.09 | 19.12 | 19.13 |
| Wheat | 20.04 | 20.02 | 19.86 | 19.78 | 19.68 |
| Oat | 22.99 | 23.00 | 23.01 | 23.05 | 23.10 |
| Yeast extract | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Chicken oil | 9.81 | 9.32 | 8.83 | 7.85 | 5.88 |
| Hemp seed oil | 0.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 4.00 |
| 2% Premix 2%1) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Nutrient levels2) | |||||
| CP | 27.49 | 27.49 | 27.49 | 27.49 | 27.49 |
| EE | 14.36 | 14.36 | 14.35 | 14.35 | 14.35 |
| CF | 2.17 | 2.17 | 2.17 | 2.16 | 2.16 |
| Ash | 3.43 | 3.43 | 3.43 | 3.43 | 3.43 |
| Ca | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 |
| P | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| ME (Kcal/Kg) | 4023.38 | 4023.37 | 4023.43 | 4023.45 | 4023.32 |
CP: crude protein, EE: crude fat, CF: crude fiber, Ca: Calcium, P: Phosphorus, ME: Metabolizable energy. A: dietary supplements 0% hemp oil in teddy dog (as control), B: dietary supplements 0.5% hemp oil in teddy dog, C: dietary supplements 1% hemp oil in teddy dog, D: dietary supplements 2% hemp oil in teddy dog and E: dietary supplements 4% hemp oil in teddy dog.
The effect of hemp oil on the apparent nutrient digestibility of teddy dogs
| Index | Treatments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | |
| Apparent Digestibility of Dry Matter (DMD %) | 86.32 ± 1.37 | 87.02 ± 0.83 | 87.43 ± 1.36 | 88.08 ± 1.71 | 87.03 ± 2.99 |
| Apparent digestibility of crude protein (CPD %) | 86.87 ± 2.04 | 88.27 ± 0.56 | 88.77 ± 1.15 | 88.87 ± 2.01 | 88.71 ± 1.82 |
| Apparent digestibility of crude fat (EED %) | 96.76 ± 1.11 | 97.50 ± 0.37 | 96.35 ± 1.02 | 97.43 ± 0.86 | 96.92 ± 0.69 |
A: dietary supplements 0% hemp oil in teddy dog (as control), B: dietary supplements 0.5% hemp oil in teddy dog, C: dietary supplements 1% hemp oil in teddy dog, D: dietary supplements 2% hemp oil in teddy dog and E: dietary supplements 4% hemp oil in teddy dog.
The effect of hemp oil on dog blood biochemical indexes
| Parameters | Treatments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | |
| IgM | 0.88 ± 0.45b | 1.07 ± 0.32ab | 1.39 ± 0.12a | 1.52 ± 0.12a | 1.49 ± 0.12a |
| IgG (g/L) | 4.00 ± 0.83 | 4.00 ± 0.65 | 4.38 ± 0.44 | 4.46 ± 0.40 | 4.49 ± 0.40 |
| IgE (kU/L) | 203.60 ± 83.42 | 321.63 ± 89.62 | 321.67 ± 58.10 | 347.88 ± 78.97 | 246.08 ± 33.74 |
| C4 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
| γ-IFN (ng/L) | 23.04 ± 5.14b | 24.63 ± 6.78b | 31.32 ± 5.73a | 31.78 ± 9.30a | 25.78 ± 6.64b |
| TP | 61.33 ± 2.97b | 68.10 ± 3.04a | 69.54 ± 4.13a | 69.30 ± 2.73a | 65.60 ± 4.25ab |
| ALB (g/L) | 35.08 ± 3.90b | 38.76 ± 2.58a | 39.20 ± 2.39a | 38.66 ± 0.43a | 40.38 ± 2.06a |
| GLB (g/L) | 26.53 ± 3.18 | 27.93 ± 1.42 | 31.63 ± 2.50 | 29.78 ± 3.00 | 27.48 ± 2.93 |
| T4 (nmol/L) | 27.11 ± 3.45b | 31.30 ± 3.93ab | 32.23 ± 4.60ab | 36.75 ± 2.91a | 33.98 ± 4.11a |
| T3 (nmol/L) | 0.94 ± 0.07b | 1.24 ± 0.15ab | 1.67 ± 0.51a | 1.50 ± 0.17a | 1.49 ± 0.16a |
| ACTH (pg/ml) | 7.80 ± 0.45b | 8.24 ± 1.49b | 8.41 ± 1.80b | 9.20 ± 1.89ab | 11.41 ± 0.78a |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.76 ± 0.06a | 0.75 ± 0.17a | 0.47 ± 0.08b | 0.53 ± 0.06b | 0.55 ± 0.16b |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.55 ± 1.46 | 4.83 ± 0.31 | 4.53 ± 1.25 | 4.58 ± 1.35 | 4.55 ± 1.35 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.49 ± 1.24a | 1.23 ± 0.55a | 0.34 ± 0.16b | 0.26 ± 0.08b | 0.31 ± 0.06b |
| GLU (mmol/L) | 5.03 ± 0.58 | 4.76 ± 0.65 | 4.65 ± 0.15 | 4.57 ± 0.24 | 4.62 ± 0.24 |
IgM: immunoglobulin M, IgG: immunoglobulin G, IgE: immunoglobulin E, C4: complement 4, γ-IFN: γ-interferon, TP: total protein, ALB: albumin, GLB: globulin, T4: thyroxine, T3: triiodothyronine, ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone, TG: triglycerides, TC: total cholesterol, LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, GLU: blood sugar. A: dietary supplements 0% hemp oil in teddy dog (as control), B: dietary supplements 0.5% hemp oil in teddy dog, C: dietary supplements 1% hemp oil in teddy dog, D: dietary supplements 2% hemp oil in teddy dog and E: dietary supplements 4% hemp oil in teddy dog.
The effect of hemp oil on the anti-oxidation indexes of dog serum
| Parameters | Treatments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | |
| SOD | 26.47 ± 2.65c | 27.83 ± 2.94bc | 28.99 ± 1.69bc | 30.63 ± 1.29 ba | 33.02 ± 3.25a |
| T-AO | 0.38 ± 0.00 | 0.39 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.05 | 0.39 ± 0.04 |
| CAT | 3.72 ± 0.43 | 4.08 ± 0.62 | 4.23 ± 0.54 | 4.20 ± 1.10 | 3.84 ± 0.38 |
| MDA | 5.30 ± 1.04a | 4.85 ± 1.02a | 3.83 ± 0.39ab | 3.28 ± 0.71b | 4.95 ± 1.13a |
SOD: superoxide dismutase, T-AO: total antioxidant capacity, CAT: catalase, MDA: malondialdehyde. A: dietary supplements 0% hemp oil in teddy dog (as control), B: dietary supplements 0.5% hemp oil in teddy dog, C: dietary supplements 1% hemp oil in teddy dog, D: dietary supplements 2% hemp oil in teddy dog and E: dietary supplements 4% hemp oil in teddy dog.
Figure 1.The principal component analysis (PCA) between control A and treatment B (Figure 1a), C (Figure 1b), D (Figure 1c), E (Figure 1d), and the orthogonal partial least square discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) score (Figure 1e) and model verification (Figure f). The abscissa represents the model accuracy and the ordinate represents the frequency of model classification effect. The prediction parameters R2X and R2Y represent the interpretation rate of X and Y matrix, and Q2 represents the prediction ability of the model. When Q2 > 0.5 means effective model, and when Q2 > 0.9 represents excellent model.
Statistics of the different metabolites number
| Treatments | Total Sig Metabolites | Down regulated | Up regulated |
|---|---|---|---|
| A_VS_B | 20 | 9 | 11 |
| A_VS_C | 18 | 7 | 11 |
| A_VS_D | 27 | 12 | 15 |
| A_VS_E | 43 | 9 | 34 |
A: dietary supplements 0% hemp oil in teddy dog (as control), B: dietary supplements 0.5% hemp oil in teddy dog, C: dietary supplements 1% hemp oil in teddy dog, D: dietary supplements 2% hemp oil in teddy dog and E: dietary supplements 4% hemp oil in teddy dog.
Figure 2.The statistical of differential metabolites-based VIP value between control A and treatment B (Figure 2a), C (Figure 2b), D (Figure 2c), and E (Figure 2d).
Differential metabolite Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis
| Treatments | Compounds | VIP | FC | Type | Pathway ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A VS B | 9α,11,15S-trihydroxythromba−5Z,13E-dien−1−oic acid | 1.29 | 0.37 | down | ko00590, ko04726 |
| 9α,15S-dihydroxy−11−oxo−prosta−5Z,13E-dien−1−oic acid | 1.03 | 0.31 | down | ko00590, ko04080, ko04726, ko05143 | |
| Deoxyguanosine5’-monophosphate (d GMP) | 1.11 | 0.11 | down | ko00230 | |
| 5S,12R-dihydroxy−6Z,8E,10E,14Z-eicosatetraenoicacid | 1.48 | 4.79 | up | ko00590, ko04080, ko04726, ko04750 | |
| Adenosine | 1.58 | 0.03 | down | ko00230, ko04080, ko04923, ko04924 | |
| A VS C | Taurocholic Acid | 1.21 | 0.14 | down | ko00120, ko04976 |
| Chenodeoxycholic Acid | 1.33 | 2.6 | up | ko00120, ko04976 | |
| 9α,15S-dihydroxy−11−oxo−prosta−5Z,13E-dien−1−oic acid | 1.58 | 0.44 | down | ko00590, ko04080, ko04726 | |
| Guanine | 1.72 | 0.21 | down | ko00230 | |
| Deoxyguanosine5’-monophosphate (d GMP) | 1.43 | 0.08 | down | ko00230 | |
| 3’-Aenylic Acid | 1.42 | 0.06 | down | ko00230 | |
| Ubiquinone | 2.07 | 2.44 | up | ko00130, ko00190 | |
| Adenosine | 2.08 | 0 | down | ko00230 | |
| A VS D | Taurocholic Acid | 1.1 | 0.2 | down | ko04976 |
| Vitamin D3 | 1.31 | 2049.29 | up | ko05323 | |
| 9α,11,15S-trihydroxythromba−5Z,13E-dien−1−oic acid | 1.82 | 0.28 | down | ko00590, ko04726, ko04976 | |
| 9α,15S-dihydroxy−11−oxo−prosta−5Z,13E-dien−1−oic acid | 1.33 | 0.25 | down | ko00590, ko04080, ko04726 | |
| Deoxyguanosine5’-monophosphate (d GMP) | 1.39 | 0.24 | down | ko00230 | |
| γ-Linolenic Acid (C18:3N6) | 1.89 | 2.78 | up | ko00591, ko01040 | |
| A-Linolenic Acid (C18:3N3) | 1.95 | 3.04 | up | ko00592, ko01040, | |
| Ubiquinone | 1.03 | 1733.93 | up | ko00130, ko00190 | |
| 9-oxo−11α,15S-dihydroxy−prosta−5Z,13E-dien−1−oic acid | 1.55 | 0.38 | down | ko00590, ko04080, ko04726, ko04750, ko04923, ko04924, ko05323 | |
| Adenosine | 1.44 | 0.10 | down | ko00230, ko04080, ko04270, ko04923, ko04924 | |
| A VS E | Guanosine | 1.59 | 0.4 | down | ko00230 |
| Ubiquinone | 1.03 | 1733.93 | up | ko00130, ko00190 | |
| Deoxyguanosine 5’-monophosphate (d GMP) | 1.34 | 0.07 | down | ko00230 | |
| 20-hydroxy−5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z-eicosatetraenoicacid | 1.38 | 2.58 | up | ko04270 | |
| 3’-Aenylic Acid | 1.53 | 0.1 | down | ko00230 | |
| Adenosine | 1.88 | 0 | down | ko00230, ko0407, ko04270 |
VIP: Variable importance projection, FC: Multiple of difference. A: dietary supplements 0% hemp oil in teddy dog (as control), B: dietary supplements 0.5% hemp oil in teddy dog, C: dietary supplements 1% hemp oil in teddy dog, D: dietary supplements 2% hemp oil in teddy dog and E: dietary supplements 4% hemp oil in teddy dog.
Figure 3.The pathway analysis of the detected differential metabolites between control A and treatment B (Figure 3a), C (Figure 3b), D (Figure 3c), and E (Figure 3d).
Figure 4.The correlation between metabolomics and nutrient digestibility during control A and treatment B (Figure 4a), C (Figure 4b), D (Figure 4c), and E (Figure 4d).
Figure 5.The correlation between metabolomics and blood biochemical index during control A and treatment B (Figure 5a), C (Figure 5b), D (Figure 5c), and E (Figure 5d).
Figure 6.The correlation between metabolomics and blood antioxidant indicators during control A and treatment B (Figure 6a), C (Figure 6b), D (Figure 6c), and E (Figure 6d). A: dietary supplements 0% hemp oil in teddy dog (as control), B: dietary supplements 0.5% hemp oil in teddy dog, C: dietary supplements 1% hemp oil in teddy dog, D: dietary supplements 2% hemp oil in teddy dog and E: dietary supplements 4% hemp oil in teddy dog.