| Literature DB >> 35198982 |
Meaghan J Griffiths1, Lauren R Alesi1, Amy L Winship1, Karla J Hutt1.
Abstract
A mouse model to study uterine specific contributions to pregnancy.Maternal environmental exposures can exert impacts on the ability of the uterus to sustain healthy pregnancy. To establish an in vivo model to study this, we designed an ovariectomized mouse embryo transfer model. The rationale being future studies could expose recipient female mice to variables such as altered diet, drug, temperature, air, or activity exposure among others to define their impacts on the uterine contribution to pregnancy. Ovariectomy ensures the extent of the variable is limited to exploring outcomes on uterine but not ovarian function. Embryo transfer from healthy, unexposed donor mice guarantees that any impacts of the variable are attributed to the maternal uterine but not the embryonic state. Pregnancy outcomes including pregnancy success (number of implantation sites) and viability (number of viable vs resorbing implantation sites) can be investigated. Numerous functional outcomes can be assessed, including developmental competence encompassing decidual, placental, fetal, and vascular morphology and/or function (e.g. measured using Doppler ultrasound, comparisons of fetal growth, or molecular or histological characterization of the decidua, placenta, and fetal tissues). LAYEntities:
Keywords: embryo transfer; endometrial receptivity; infertility; ovariectomy; pregnancy
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35198982 PMCID: PMC8861889 DOI: 10.1530/RAF-21-0087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Fertil ISSN: 2633-8386
Figure 1Optimizing an embryo transfer model for studying uterine specific contributions to pregnancy. (A) Young adult female mice were ovariectomized and rested for 2 weeks before hormone priming with estradiol (D0) and progesterone (D2) before embryo transfer surgery on D3. Pregnancy was supported with estradiol (25 ng) at the time of embryo transfer and daily s.c. injections of progesterone (1 mg) from D3 until time of tissue collection. Implantation sites were harvested 10 days post embryo transfer. (B) The embryo transfer success rate shows three out of four mice of each strain were pregnant at D13. (C) Implantation rates per animal were similar. (D) Panels show images of each pregnant uterus from each strain and the variety in developmental stage of each implantation site. Scale bars 5 mm. Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m.; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; n = 4/group.
Embryo transfer success. The number of viable implanted embryos, and resorbing non-viable implantation sites for each strain at 10 days post embryo transfer. Data are represented as mean ± s.e.m.
| Strain | Transferred | Implanted | Viable | Resorbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C57BL6/J | 10 | 3.33 ± 1.20 | 2.67 ± 1.53 | 0.67 ± 0.57 |
| Asmu:Swiss | 10 | 3.00 ± 1.00 | 2.67 ± 2.08 | 0.33 ± 0.57 |
| C57BL6/J × Balb/c(F1) | 10 | 2.00 ± 1.00 | 1.67 ± 1.16 | 0.33 ± 0.57 |
Figure 2Histological features of fetal and placental tissues from Swiss and F1 mothers. (A) Macroscopic images of dissected implantation sites from Swiss and F1 females, which had the most developmentally advanced implantation sites. (B) Representative cross sections of fetal tissues. Forebrain structures (>) appear less developed in offspring from Swiss mothers compared to the F1 strain. Additionally, development of other organs including the liver (*) are apparent in offspring from F1 mothers. (C) From representative photomicrographs of PAS staining, there were no apparent differences in gross placental morphology between strains. Yellow dotted line separates labyrinth and spongiotrophoblast sections of the placenta. Images taken at 10× objective.
Figure 3Uterine artery blood flow is most readily detectable by Doppler ultrasound in the outbred Swiss strain. (A) Representative images of uterine artery waveforms. Outbred Swiss have greater peak systolic velocity (B), end diastolic velocity (C), and velocity time interval (D). No changes in pulsatility (E) or resistance (F) indices. Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m.; unpaired t-test between C57BL6J and Swiss groups only for (B-F); n = 2–4/group.
Advantages and weaknesses of each strain for use in embryo transfer studies.
| Strain | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| C57BL6/J | • Multiple implantation sites | • Slower developmental progression |
| Swiss | • High-velocity uterine blood flow | • May require clip repairing or culling post surgery |
| C57BL6/J × Balb/c(F1) | • Low risk of interventions post surgery | • Difficult to detect blood flow |