| Literature DB >> 35197764 |
Shamsan A Almowallad1, Moneera O Aljobair2, Amal N Alkuraieef2, Amani H Aljahani2, Amnah M Alsuhaibani2, Muneer M Alsayadi1.
Abstract
The pectinase enzymes are involved in several industrial applications, and industrial waste is one of the largest environmental pollutants, so this study aims to Endo-polygalacturonase (endo-PG) producing using Aspergillus niger AUMC 4156, Penicillium oxalicum AUMC 4153 and P. variotii AUMC 4149 by using some agro-industrial wastes (dried orange peel and sugar beet pulp) as a sole raw carbon source for degradation these waste in the process of urban wastes disposal. The fermentation process was carried out as a submerged culture technique under both shaken and static culture conditions. A. niger AUMC 4156 was the most promising producer of endo-PG under static conditions while P. oxalicum AUMC 4153 was the highest producer of endo-PG under shaken conditions. Sugar beet pulp proved to be the most preferable to orange peel as the only source of carbon in both shaken and static cultures. The medium that encompassing orange peel as a single carbon source afforded the highest protein content with all tested fungal strains in stirred and static cultures in comparison with sugar beet pulp. The highest activity of endo-polygalacuronase that produced using A. niger AUMC 4156 and P. oxalicum AUMC 4153 was achieved by using sugar beet pulp at 3% concentration under static cultures, meanwhile maximal enzyme activity produced by both fungal strains required 2% sugar beet pulp under shaken cultures. Sugar beet pulp showed promised potential as a good inducer for endo-polygalacturoase production, and enzymes production depended on fungal strains, culture medium, and submerged fermentation conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Endo-polygalacturonase; Fungi; Orange peel; Sugar beet pulp
Year: 2021 PMID: 35197764 PMCID: PMC8847967 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.10.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Gross chemical composition of the dried orange peel and sugar beet pulp (g/100 g on a dry weight basis).
| 12.00 ± 2.21c | 10.00 ± 1.53b | |
| 3.2 ± 0.75e | 20.9 ± 2.5a | |
| 1.3 ± 0.27f | 17.8 ± 1.20a | |
| 36.3 ± 2.18a | 20.4 ± 1.44a | |
| 9.8 ± 1.42c | 8.3 ± 0.62b | |
| 2.3 ± 0.53f | 1.6 ± 0.07d | |
| 5.6 ± 0.94d | 4.3 ± 0.58c | |
| 16.6 ± 1.42b | 9.5 ± 1.10b |
Difference letters in the same column indicate the significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Endo-PG activity (% reduction in viscosity of 1% buffered polygalacturonic acid solution) in various shaken and static fungal cultures*.
| Fungal strains | Endo- polygalacturonase activity (% reduction in viscosity) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sugar beet pulp 3%(w/v) | Orange peel 3% (w/v) | |||
| Static | Shaken | Static | Shaken | |
| 54.44 ± 1.4a1 | 51.11 ± 2.5b3 | 52.22 ± 1.63a2 | 48.89 ± 1.4b4 | |
| 42.65 ± 2.31c1 | 5.88 ± 1.86c3 | 14.06 ± 1.14c2 | 2.94 ± 0.41c4 | |
| 50.22 ± 2.74b2 | 52.94 ± 2.0a1 | 49.26 ± 2.53b2 | 50.00 ± 1.3a2 | |
*Fermentation conditions: 5 days at 30˚C, shaken (150 rpm). Difference letters in the same column indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05. Difference numbers in the same raw indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Protein content (mg/ml) of the culture filtrates of static and shaken fungal cultures*.
| Sugar beet pulp 3% (w/v) | Orange peel 3% (w/v) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static | Shaken | Static | Shaken | |
| 3.72 ± 0.42a | 1.66 ± 0.09b | 4.74 ± 0.6a | 2.57 ± 0.43b | |
| 2.82 ± 0.9b | 2.94 ± 0.07a | 4.45 ± 0.74b | 3.75 ± 0.71a | |
| 3.98 ± 0.82a | 2.29 ± 0.3a | 4.98 ± 0.42a | 3.40 ± 0.20a | |
*Fermentation conditions: 5 days at 30˚C, shaken (150 rpm). Difference letters in the same column indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Effect of different concentrations of sugar beet pulp on endo-PG production by Aspergillus niger AUMC 4156 using both static and shaken conditions*.
| Sugar beet pulp powder Concentration % (w/v) | Endo- polygalacturonase activity (% reduction in viscosity) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static | Shaken | |||
| (% reduction in viscosity) | Protein content | (% reduction in viscosity) | Protein content | |
| 1% | 43.33 ± 2.19d2 | 1.38 ± 0.04e1 | 48.89 ± 1.54b1 | 0.80 ± 0.05e2 |
| 2% | 47.78 ± 1.73c | 2.99 ± 0.08d1 | 52.22 ± 1.97a1 | 1.29 ± 0.05d2 |
| 3% | 54.77 ± 3.03a1 | 3.75 ± 0.04c1 | 51.00 ± 2.59a2 | 1.63 ± 0.03c2 |
| 4% | 51.11 ± 2.27b1 | 4.43 ± 0.06b1 | 46.66 ± 2.12c2 | 2.94 ± 0.07b2 |
| 5% | 46.67 ± 2.26c1 | 4.77 ± 0.03a1 | 44.45 ± 2.06d2 | 3.50 ± 0.04a2 |
*Fermentation conditions: 5 days at 30˚C, shaken (150 rpm). Difference letters in the same column indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05. Difference numbers in the same raw indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Effect of different concentrations of sugar beet pulp on endo-PG production by Penicillium oxalicum AUMC 4153 using both static and shaken conditions*.
| Endo- polygalacturonase activity (% reduction in viscosity) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static | Shaken | |||
| (% reduction in viscosity) | Protein content | (% reduction in viscosity) | Protein content | |
| 1% | 36.76 ± 1.07d2 | 1.48 ± 0.05d1 | 48.53 ± 2.04b1 | 0.96 ± 0.01e2 |
| 2% | 42.65 ± 2.53c2 | 3.24 ± 0.02c1 | 53.47 ± 2.16a1 | 1.92 ± 0.02d2 |
| 3% | 50.73 ± 1.91a2 | 3.95 ± 0.04b1 | 52.94 ± 2.13a1 | 2.33 ± 0.01c2 |
| 4% | 45.59 ± 1.42b | 4.42 ± 0.06a1 | 45.59 ± 1.87c | 2.58 ± 0.03b2 |
| 5% | 41.18 ± 2.06c2 | 4.67 ± 0.05a1 | 43.38 ± 1.33d1 | 2.90 ± 0.02a2 |
*Fermentation conditions: 5 days at 30˚C, shaken (150 rpm). Difference letters in the same column indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05. Difference numbers in the same raw indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.