Literature DB >> 35195798

Is absorbable mesh useful in preventing parastomal hernia after emergency surgery? The PARTHENOPE study.

F Pizza1, D D'Antonio2, F S Lucido3, P Del Rio4, C Dell'Isola5, L Brusciano3, S Tolone3, L Docimo3, C Gambardella3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Colostomy is a frequent event in oncological or inflammatory bowel diseases. Its related morbidity includes retraction, infection and parastomal hernia (PH), which is a quite common late complication. Several surgical options are available for PH repair, the majority including mesh. However, results are often disappointing with relevant recurrence rates, up to 33%. The study aim was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of prophylactic biosynthetic mesh (BIO-A®, polyglycolide-trimethylene carbonate copolymer) placed during colostomy fashioning, in reducing PH. A prospective randomized controlled double-blind trial was conducted from January 2014 to December 2019 to compare conventional end-colostomy with end-colostomy reinforced with BIO-A mesh in ante-rectus position in patients undergoing colon diversion in emergency surgery.
METHODS: Patients were clinically followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months and received a CT scan at 6 and 12 months. The postoperative morbidity and wound events were also evaluated.
RESULTS: 55 patients receiving conventional colostomy considered as Control Group and 55 patients receiving BIO-A mesh supported colostomy (Mesh Group) were included in the study. At 12 months, the incidence of PH was 9 (12.7%) and 24 (43.6%) in the Mesh Group and Control Group, respectively (p < 0.05). Postoperative morbidity was similar between Mesh Group and Control Group (7 [12.7%] vs 4 [7.3%], respectively; p = 0.340). The multivariable analysis showed that not using a mesh (p = 0.042), age > 70 years (p = 0.041), diabetes (p < 0.001), colon dilation > 7 cm (p < 0.0001) and COPD (p = 0.009) were all related with postoperative PH.
CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic BIO-A mesh positioning during colostomy is an effective procedure reducing PH incidence at a 1 years follow-up guaranteeing low postoperative morbidity. STUDY DATASET IS AVAILABLE ON CLINICALTRIALS. GOV ID: NCT04436887.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absorbable mesh; Hartmann's urgent procedure; Parastomal hernia prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35195798     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02579-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  26 in total

Review 1.  Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zachary M Borab; Sameer Shakir; Michael A Lanni; Michael G Tecce; John MacDonald; William W Hope; John P Fischer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Birgitta M E Hansson; Nicholas J Slater; Arjan Schouten van der Velden; Hans M M Groenewoud; Otmar R Buyne; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Rob P Bleichrodt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Safety and efficacy of prophylactic resorbable biosynthetic mesh following midline laparotomy in clean/contemned field: preliminary results of a randomized double blind prospective trial.

Authors:  F Pizza; D D'Antonio; M Arcopinto; C Dell'Isola; A Marvaso
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation.

Authors:  Asim Cingi; Tebessum Cakir; Ali Sever; A Ozdemir Aktan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Long-term Recurrence and Complications Associated With Elective Incisional Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Dunja Kokotovic; Thue Bisgaard; Frederik Helgstrand
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Parastomal hernia.

Authors:  P W G Carne; G M Robertson; F A Frizelle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair?

Authors:  M S Rubin; D J Schoetz; J B Matthews
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1994-04

Review 8.  The CONSORT statement.

Authors:  Sarah Cuschieri
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2019-04

Review 9.  Prophylactic mesh placement to avoid incisional hernias after stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L C L van den Hil; S van Steensel; M H F Schreinemacher; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Use of Prophylactic Mesh When Creating a Colostomy Does Not Prevent Parastomal Hernia: A Randomized Controlled Trial-STOMAMESH.

Authors:  Christoffer Odensten; Karin Strigård; Jörgen Rutegård; Michael Dahlberg; Ulrika Ståhle; Ulf Gunnarsson; Pia Näsvall
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Nationwide analysis of laparoscopic groin hernia repair in Italy from 2015 to 2020.

Authors:  Monica Ortenzi; Emanuele Botteri; Andrea Balla; Mauro Podda; Mario Guerrieri; Alberto Sartori
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-09-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.