Literature DB >> 35192088

Psychometric Properties of the Big Three Perfectionism Scale: Rasch Analysis.

Pei-Chen Wu1.   

Abstract

The Big Three Perfectionism Scale (BTPS) is one of commonly used measures for assessing individuals' perfectionism. The main purpose of this current study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Big Three Perfectionism Scale (BTPS) within the framework of the Rasch model. The sample consisted of 502 adolescents (53% males and 47% females). This study revealed were several important findings. First, adolescents interpreted the categories of the rating scales of the BTPS as intended and items demonstrated good targeting with the operating ranges from - 4.79 to 4.47 logits for rigid perfectionism, from - 3.84 to 3.76 logits for self-critical perfectionism and from - 4.04 to 3.92 logits for narcissistic perfectionism. Second, rigid perfectionism, self-critical perfectionism and narcissistic perfectionism exhibited unidimensionally, providing justification for the use of summed scores for each scale. Third, the average item difficulty of facets was different within each scale, with the facets of self-worth contingencies, socially prescribed perfectionism and other-oriented perfectionism being more difficult to endorse in their belonging scale. Fourth, there were no DIF items across sex, suggesting that items in three scales functioned equally across boys and girls. Fifth, rigid perfectionism (r = 0.15) and self-critical perfectionism (r = 0.55) were positively associated with neuroticism, but self-critical perfectionism (r = - 0.24) and narcissistic perfectionism (r = - 0.29) were negatively related with agreeableness. Finally, sex moderated the associations between rigid perfectionism and neuroticism. In sum, the findings in this study enhance psychometric properties of the BTPS.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BTPS; Big three perfectionism scale; Perfectionism; Rasch analysis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35192088     DOI: 10.1007/s10578-022-01331-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev        ISSN: 0009-398X


  8 in total

1.  Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals.

Authors:  Everett V Smith
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2002

2.  Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness.

Authors:  John M Linacre
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2002

Review 3.  The Relationship Between Perfectionism and Psychopathology: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Karina Limburg; Hunna J Watson; Martin S Hagger; Sarah J Egan
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-12-27

4.  Sample Size and Statistical Conclusions from Tests of Fit to the Rasch Model According to the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (Rumm) Program in Health Outcome Measurement.

Authors:  Peter Hagell; Albert Westergren
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2016

Review 5.  Perfectionism as a transdiagnostic process: a clinical review.

Authors:  Sarah J Egan; Tracey D Wade; Roz Shafran
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-05-05

6.  The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.

Authors:  Christopher J Soto; Oliver P John
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-04-07

7.  Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval.

Authors:  B D Wright; J M Linacre
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 8.  Perfectionism and the Five-Factor Model of Personality: A Meta-Analytic Review.

Authors:  Martin M Smith; Simon B Sherry; Vanja Vidovic; Donald H Saklofske; Joachim Stoeber; Aryn Benoit
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-01-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.