Literature DB >> 35190641

p53-NEIL1 co-abnormalities induce genomic instability and promote synthetic lethality with Chk1 inhibition in multiple myeloma having concomitant 17p13(del) and 1q21(gain).

Phaik Ju Teoh1,2, Omer An3, Tae-Hoon Chung3, Thamil Vaiyapuri4, Anandhkumar Raju4, Michal M Hoppe3, Sabrina H M Toh3, Wilson Wang5,6, Ming Chun Chan5,6, Melissa J Fullwood3, Anand D Jeyasekharan7,3,8,9, Vinay Tergaonkar4, Leilei Chen3, Henry Yang3, Wee Joo Chng7,3,8,9.   

Abstract

Recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities are the main hallmark of multiple myeloma (MM) and patients having 2 or more high-risk prognostic events are associated with extremely poor outcome. 17p13(del) and 1q21(gain) are critical and independent high-risk cytogenetic markers, however, the biological significance underlying the poor outcome in MM patients having co-occurrence of both these chromosomal aberrations has never been interrogated. Herein, we identified that patients harbouring concomitant 17p13(del) with 1q21(gain) demonstrated the worst prognosis as compared to patients with single- (either 17p13(del) or 1q21(gain)) and with no chromosomal events (WT for both chromosomal loci); and they are highly enriched for genomic instability (GI) signature. We discovered that the GI feature in the patients with concomitant 17p13(del)-1q21(gain) was recapitulating the biological properties of myeloma cells with co-existing p53-deficiency and NEIL1 mRNA-hyper-editing (associated with chromosome 17p and 1q, respectively) that have inherent DNA damage response (DDR) and persistent activation of Chk1 pathway. Importantly, this became a vulnerable point for therapeutic targeting whereby the cells with this co-abnormalities demonstrated hyper-sensitivity to siRNA- and pharmacological-mediated-Chk1 inhibition, as observed at both the in vitro and in vivo levels. Mechanistically, this was attributable to the synthetic lethal relationship between p53-NEIL1-Chk1 abnormalities. The Chk1 inhibitor (AZD7762) tested showed good synergism with standard-of-care myeloma drugs, velcade and melphalan, thus further reinforcing the translational potential of this therapeutic approach. In summary, combination of NEIL1-p53 abnormalities with an ensuing Chk1 activation could serve as an Achilles heel and predispose MM cells with co-existing 1q21(gain) and 17p13(del) to therapeutic vulnerability for Chk1 inhibition.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35190641     DOI: 10.1038/s41388-022-02227-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   8.756


  44 in total

1.  Treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with lenalidomide and dexamethasone with or without bortezomib: prospective evaluation of the impact of cytogenetic abnormalities and of previous therapies.

Authors:  M A Dimopoulos; E Kastritis; D Christoulas; M Migkou; M Gavriatopoulou; M Gkotzamanidou; M Iakovaki; C Matsouka; D Mparmparoussi; M Roussou; E Efstathiou; E Terpos
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  The survival impact of CKS1B gains or amplification is dependent on the background karyotype and TP53 deletion status in patients with myeloma.

Authors:  Suyang Hao; Xinyan Lu; Zimu Gong; Roland L Bassett; Shimin Hu; Sergej N Konoplev; Guilin Tang; Shaoying Li; Jie Xu; Mahsa Khanlari; Hans C Lee; Elisabet E Manasanch; Donna M Weber; Robert Z Orlowski; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Pei Lin
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  A Keith Stewart; S Vincent Rajkumar; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Tamás Masszi; Ivan Špička; Albert Oriol; Roman Hájek; Laura Rosiñol; David S Siegel; Georgi G Mihaylov; Vesselina Goranova-Marinova; Péter Rajnics; Aleksandr Suvorov; Ruben Niesvizky; Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Jesus F San-Miguel; Heinz Ludwig; Michael Wang; Vladimír Maisnar; Jiri Minarik; William I Bensinger; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Dina Ben-Yehuda; Vishal Kukreti; Naseem Zojwalla; Margaret E Tonda; Xinqun Yang; Biao Xing; Philippe Moreau; Antonio Palumbo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review.

Authors:  R Fonseca; P L Bergsagel; J Drach; J Shaughnessy; N Gutierrez; A K Stewart; G Morgan; B Van Ness; M Chesi; S Minvielle; A Neri; B Barlogie; W M Kuehl; P Liebisch; F Davies; S Chen-Kiang; B G M Durie; R Carrasco; Orhan Sezer; Tony Reiman; Linda Pilarski; H Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 5.  Chromosome 1q21 abnormalities in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Timothy M Schmidt; Rafael Fonseca; Saad Z Usmani
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 11.037

6.  A novel prognostic model in myeloma based on co-segregating adverse FISH lesions and the ISS: analysis of patients treated in the MRC Myeloma IX trial.

Authors:  K D Boyd; F M Ross; L Chiecchio; G P Dagrada; Z J Konn; W J Tapper; B A Walker; C P Wardell; W M Gregory; A J Szubert; S E Bell; J A Child; G H Jackson; F E Davies; G J Morgan
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Prediction of outcome in newly diagnosed myeloma: a meta-analysis of the molecular profiles of 1905 trial patients.

Authors:  V Shah; A L Sherborne; B A Walker; D C Johnson; E M Boyle; S Ellis; D B Begum; P Z Proszek; J R Jones; C Pawlyn; S Savola; M W Jenner; M T Drayson; R G Owen; R S Houlston; D A Cairns; W M Gregory; G Cook; F E Davies; G H Jackson; G J Morgan; M F Kaiser
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Analysis of the genomic landscape of multiple myeloma highlights novel prognostic markers and disease subgroups.

Authors:  Niccolo Bolli; Giulia Biancon; Matahi Moarii; Silvia Gimondi; Yilong Li; Chiara de Philippis; Francesco Maura; Vijitha Sathiaseelan; Yu-Tzu Tai; Laura Mudie; Sarah O'Meara; Keiran Raine; Jon W Teague; Adam P Butler; Cristiana Carniti; Moritz Gerstung; Tina Bagratuni; Efstathios Kastritis; Meletios Dimopoulos; Paolo Corradini; Kenneth C Anderson; Philippe Moreau; Stephane Minvielle; Peter J Campbell; Elli Papaemmanuil; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Nikhil C Munshi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Treatment outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetics receiving single-agent carfilzomib in the PX-171-003-A1 study.

Authors:  A J Jakubowiak; D S Siegel; T Martin; M Wang; R Vij; S Lonial; S Trudel; V Kukreti; N Bahlis; M Alsina; A Chanan-Khan; F Buadi; F J Reu; G Somlo; J Zonder; K Song; A K Stewart; E Stadtmauer; B L Harrison; A F Wong; R Z Orlowski; S Jagannath
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  A high-risk, Double-Hit, group of newly diagnosed myeloma identified by genomic analysis.

Authors:  Brian A Walker; Konstantinos Mavrommatis; Christopher P Wardell; T Cody Ashby; Michael Bauer; Faith Davies; Adam Rosenthal; Hongwei Wang; Pingping Qu; Antje Hoering; Mehmet Samur; Fadi Towfic; Maria Ortiz; Erin Flynt; Zhinuan Yu; Zhihong Yang; Dan Rozelle; John Obenauer; Matthew Trotter; Daniel Auclair; Jonathan Keats; Niccolo Bolli; Mariateresa Fulciniti; Raphael Szalat; Phillipe Moreau; Brian Durie; A Keith Stewart; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Marc S Raab; Hermann Einsele; Pieter Sonneveld; Jesus San Miguel; Sagar Lonial; Graham H Jackson; Kenneth C Anderson; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Nikhil Munshi; Anjan Thakurta; Gareth Morgan
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 11.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.