Literature DB >> 35190119

Analyte recovery in LC-MS/MS bioanalysis: An old issue revisited.

Devendra Kumar1, Nagsen Gautam2, Yazen Alnouti3.   

Abstract

There are several challenges associated with LC-MS/MS bioanalytical method development and validation. Low and variable recovery of some analytes, especially the more hydrophobic ones, is often challenging. Analytes can be lost to various extents throughout the process of sample collection, storage, before, during, and/or after sample preparation and analysis. The calculation of overall extraction recovery can detect problems of low recovery during sample preparation but does not identify the source(s) of analyte losses. Low overall analyte recovery is the net result of losses that can happen for multiple reasons at all steps of sample preparation and analysis. Therefore, identifying the source(s) of analyte loss during sample preparation can help guide the optimization the bioanalysis conditions to minimize these losses. In this article we propose a practical protocol to systematically identify and quantify the sources of low analyte recovery. This allows the proper choice of strategies to optimize the relevant bioanalytical conditions to minimize analyte losses and improve overall recovery. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioanalytical method; LC-MS/MS; Matrix effect; Recovery

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35190119      PMCID: PMC8864627          DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chim Acta        ISSN: 0003-2670            Impact factor:   6.558


  42 in total

1.  Strategies in quantitative LC-MS/MS analysis of unstable small molecules in biological matrices.

Authors:  Wenkui Li; Jie Zhang; Francis L S Tse
Journal:  Biomed Chromatogr       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.902

2.  Ion-suppression effects in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry due to a formulation agent, a case study in drug discovery bioanalysis.

Authors:  Patrice J Larger; Massimo Breda; Daniela Fraier; Heather Hughes; Christopher A James
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.935

Review 3.  Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method as the golden standard for therapeutic drug monitoring in renal transplant.

Authors:  Filippo Aucella; Vincenzo Lauriola; Gennaro Vecchione; Giovanni Luca Tiscia; Elvira Grandone
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 3.935

4.  Electrospray: from ions in solution to ions in the gas phase, what we know now.

Authors:  Paul Kebarle; Udo H Verkerk
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 10.946

5.  Simultaneous LC-MS/MS quantitation of a highly hydrophobic pharmaceutical compound and its metabolite in urine using online monolithic phase-based extraction.

Authors:  Raymond Naxing Xu; Brian Boyd; Matthew J Rieser; Tawakol A El-Shourbagy
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.645

6.  Matrix effect in quantitative LC/MS/MS analyses of biological fluids: a method for determination of finasteride in human plasma at picogram per milliliter concentrations.

Authors:  B K Matuszewski; M L Constanzer; C M Chavez-Eng
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Binding of taxol to plastic and glass containers and protein under in vitro conditions.

Authors:  D Song; L F Hsu; J L Au
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 8.  Mass spectrometric based approaches in urine metabolomics and biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Mona M Khamis; Darryl J Adamko; Anas El-Aneed
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 10.946

9.  Matrix effects and application of matrix effect factor.

Authors:  Wanlong Zhou; Shuang Yang; Perry G Wang
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Sensitive and cost-effective LC-MS/MS method for quantitation of CVT-6883 in human urine using sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate additive to eliminate adsorptive losses.

Authors:  Chungwen Chen; Lakshmikant Bajpai; Nevena Mollova; Kwan Leung
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.