Literature DB >> 35189161

Leveraging modeling and simulation to optimize the therapeutic window for epigenetic modifier drugs.

Antje-Christine Walz1, Arthur J Van De Vyver2, Li Yu3, Marc R Birtwistle4, Nevan J Krogan5, Mehdi Bouhaddou5.   

Abstract

Dysregulated epigenetic processes can lead to altered gene expression and give rise to malignant transformation and tumorigenesis. Epigenetic drugs aim to revert the phenotype of cancer cells to normally functioning cells, and are developed and applied to treat both hematological and solid cancers. Despite this promising therapeutic avenue, the successful development of epigenetic modulators has been challenging. We argue that besides identifying the right responder patient population, the selection of an optimized dosing regimen is equally important. For the majority of epigenetic modulators, hematological adverse effects such as thrombocytopenia, anemia or neutropenia are frequently observed and may limit their therapeutic potential. Therefore, one of the key challenges is to identify a dosing regimen that maximizes drug efficacy and minimizes toxicity. This requires a good understanding of the quantitative relationship between the administered dose, the drug exposure and the magnitude and duration of drug response related to safety and efficacy. With case examples, we highlight how modeling and simulation has been successfully applied to address those questions. As an outlook, we suggest the combination of efficacy and safety prediction models that capture the quantitative, mechanistic relationships governing the balance between their safety and efficacy dynamics. A stepwise approach for its implementation is presented. Utilizing in silico explorations, the impact of dosing regimen on the therapeutic window can be explored. This will serve as a basis to select the most promising dosing regimen that maximizes efficacy while minimizing adverse effects and to increase the probability of success for the given epigenetic drug.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical utility; Epigenetic drugs; Modeling and simulation; Optimized dosing regimen; Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic; Therapeutic window

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35189161      PMCID: PMC9292061          DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0163-7258            Impact factor:   13.400


  49 in total

1.  Can the flow of medicines be improved? Fundamental pharmacokinetic and pharmacological principles toward improving Phase II survival.

Authors:  Paul Morgan; Piet H Van Der Graaf; John Arrowsmith; Doug E Feltner; Kira S Drummond; Craig D Wegner; Steve D A Street
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 2.  How modeling and simulation have enhanced decision making in new drug development.

Authors:  Raymond Miller; Wayne Ewy; Brian W Corrigan; Daniele Ouellet; David Hermann; Kenneth G Kowalski; Peter Lockwood; Jeffrey R Koup; Sean Donevan; Ayman El-Kattan; Cheryl S W Li; John L Werth; Douglas E Feltner; Richard L Lalonde
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 3.  Tazemetostat: First Approval.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Model of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression with parameter consistency across drugs.

Authors:  Lena E Friberg; Anja Henningsson; Hugo Maas; Laurent Nguyen; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Effectiveness and safety of different azacitidine dosage regimens in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Regina García-Delgado; Dunia de Miguel; Alicia Bailén; José Ramón González; Joan Bargay; José F Falantes; Rafael Andreu; Fernando Ramos; Mar Tormo; Salut Brunet; Antonio Figueredo; Javier Casaño; Angeles Medina; Llorenç Badiella; Antonio Fernández Jurado; Guillermo Sanz
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.156

6.  ORY-1001, a Potent and Selective Covalent KDM1A Inhibitor, for the Treatment of Acute Leukemia.

Authors:  Tamara Maes; Cristina Mascaró; Iñigo Tirapu; Angels Estiarte; Filippo Ciceri; Serena Lunardi; Nathalie Guibourt; Alvaro Perdones; Michele M P Lufino; Tim C P Somervaille; Dan H Wiseman; Cihangir Duy; Ari Melnick; Christophe Willekens; Alberto Ortega; Marc Martinell; Nuria Valls; Guido Kurz; Matthew Fyfe; Julio Cesar Castro-Palomino; Carlos Buesa
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 7.  Epigenetic tools (The Writers, The Readers and The Erasers) and their implications in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Subhankar Biswas; C Mallikarjuna Rao
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  In epigenetic therapy, less is more.

Authors:  Hui Shen; Peter W Laird
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 9.  Emerging epigenetic-modulating therapies in lymphoma.

Authors:  David Sermer; Laura Pasqualucci; Hans-Guido Wendel; Ari Melnick; Anas Younes
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.