Literature DB >> 35188649

Increasing the Value of Data Within a Large Pharmaceutical Company Through In Silico Models.

Alessandro Brigo1, Doha Naga2,3, Wolfgang Muster2.   

Abstract

The present contribution describes how in silico models and methods are applied at different stages of the drug discovery process in the pharmaceutical industry. A description of the most relevant computational methods and tools is given along with an evaluation of their performance in the assessment of potential genotoxic impurities and the prediction of off-target in vitro pharmacology. The challenges of predicting the outcome of highly complex in vivo studies are discussed followed by considerations on how novel ways to manage, store, exchange, and analyze data may advance knowledge and facilitate modeling efforts. In this context, the current status of broad data sharing initiatives, namely, eTOX and eTransafe, will be described along with related projects that could significantly reduce the use of animals in drug discovery in the future.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational toxicology; Data sharing; Drug discovery; ICH M7; Lead optimization; Machine learning; Off-target pharmacology; SEND format

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35188649     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1960-5_24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  44 in total

1.  Knowledge-based expert systems for toxicity and metabolism prediction: DEREK, StAR and METEOR.

Authors:  N Greene; P N Judson; J J Langowski; C A Marchant
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Computer prediction of possible toxic action from chemical structure; the DEREK system.

Authors:  D M Sanderson; C G Earnshaw
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Publicly-accessible QSAR software tools developed by the Joint Research Centre.

Authors:  M Pavan; A P Worth
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 4.  Structure alerts for carcinogenicity, and the Salmonella assay system: a novel insight through the chemical relational databases technology.

Authors:  Romualdo Benigni; Cecilia Bossa
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Trial watch: phase II and phase III attrition rates 2011-2012.

Authors:  John Arrowsmith; Philip Miller
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Comparative evaluation of in silico systems for ames test mutagenicity prediction: scope and limitations.

Authors:  Alexander Hillebrecht; Wolfgang Muster; Alessandro Brigo; Manfred Kansy; Thomas Weiser; Thomas Singer
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  Trial watch: Phase II failures: 2008-2010.

Authors:  John Arrowsmith
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  Trial watch: phase III and submission failures: 2007-2010.

Authors:  John Arrowsmith
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 9.  Computational toxicology in drug development.

Authors:  Wolfgang Muster; Alexander Breidenbach; Holger Fischer; Stephan Kirchner; Lutz Müller; Axel Pähler
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 7.851

10.  The eTOX data-sharing project to advance in silico drug-induced toxicity prediction.

Authors:  Montserrat Cases; Katharine Briggs; Thomas Steger-Hartmann; François Pognan; Philippe Marc; Thomas Kleinöder; Christof H Schwab; Manuel Pastor; Jörg Wichard; Ferran Sanz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.