| Literature DB >> 35187457 |
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether trabeculectomy and its intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect have an effect on ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) in glaucoma patients.Entities:
Keywords: Dynamic contour tonometry; Goldmann applanation tonometry; glaucoma; ocular pulse amplitude; trabeculectomy
Year: 2019 PMID: 35187457 PMCID: PMC8842069 DOI: 10.14744/bej.2019.61687
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beyoglu Eye J ISSN: 2459-1777
Frequency distribution of baseline characteristics of the eyes of participants
| Variable (n=70 eyes) | Number of eyes | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Lens situation | ||
| Phakic | 56 | 80 |
| Pseudophakic | 14 | 20 |
| Glaucoma type | ||
| Pseudoexfoliative | 14 | 20 |
| POAG | 40 | 57.1 |
| PACG | 16 | 22.8 |
POAG; primary open-angle glaucoma; primary angle closure glaucoma.
Difference between parameters in the study eye and control eye
| Variable | Study Eye (Mean±SD) n=35 | Control Eye (Mean±SD) n=35 | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| BCVA (snellen) | 0.45±0.33 | 0.62±0.37 | 0.04 |
| CCT (µm) | 535.71±32.32 | 536.06±28.69 | 0.96 |
| CD ratio | 0.87±0.19 | 0.65±0.30 | 0.00 |
BCVA: best-corrected visual acuity; CCT: central corneal thickness; CD: cup to disc ratio; SD: standard deviation;
Analysis waas carried out using the independent t-test.
Preoperative and postoperative systolic, diastolic blood pressures and pulse rates and p-values for the difference between two time points
| Baseline | Postoperative | Difference | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 138.80±14.98 | 140.17±14.12 | 1.37±15.80 | 0.467 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 80.80±9.28 | 79.71±6.03 | -1.09±9.89 | 0.358 |
| Heart rate (Per minute) | 78.03±7.89 | 75.77±5.99 | -2.26±8.81 | 0.060 |
Analysis was carried out using paired t-test; BP: blood pressure.
Difference between preoperative and postoperative parameters in control eye and study eye
| Study eye | p | Control eye | p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Baseline | Postoperative | Baseline | Postoperative | |||
| Q value | 1.97±0.71 | 2.26±0.70 | 0.06 | 1.89±0.72 | 2.29±0.67 | 0.02 |
| OPA | 4.73±1.88 | 2.96±1.66 | <0.001 | 3.70±1.50 | 3.35±1.34 | 0.10 |
| DCT IOP | 31.23±10.55 | 18.39±7.25 | <0.001 | 22.48±7.58 | 22.16±7.03 | 0.77 |
| GAT IOP | 24.97±8.26 | 12.83±4.35 | <0.001 | 16.71±5.64 | 16.80±5.56 | 0.93 |
Analysis was carried out using paired test, OPA; ocular pulse amplitude, DCT; dynamic contour tonometry, GAT; Goldmann applanation tonometry, IOP; intraocular pressure.
Association between change in OPA and change in IOP
| OPA Change in study eye (n=35) | OPA Change in control eye (n=35) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Pearson Correlation | Regression coefficient (95% CI) | Pearson Correlation | Regression coefficient (95% CI) | |
| DCT IOP Change | α=0.54 p<0.001 | 0.093 (0.041-0.145) | 0.28 p=0.10 | 0.055 (-0.011-0.120) |
| GAT IOP Change | α=0.38 p=0.03 | 0.093 (0.013-0.173) | 0.33 p=0.06 | 0.072 (-0.002-0.146) |
OPA: ocular pulse amplitude; DCT: dynamic contour tonometry; GAT: Goldmann applanation tonometry; IOP: intraocular pressure.